Lonelygirl15

I'm fairly certain that it just means that if trainer were to visit the site again before then, to pull the content from his local disk cache of it (if it's still there)... But if he visits after then, to pull the content from the website itself, regardless of whether there's a local, cached, copy ...

Does the "expires" part mean that it's going to disappear sometime tomorrow?

I'm not so sure it was there yesterday when we were discussing things. I went and looked at the site, and I'm pretty sure I was on it long enough for the flash to have appeared if it was going to. I was on it long enough to scan the source code, just to see if there happened to be anything ...

Regardless of whether or not THAT screenname is him, do you really doubt he's reading this?

Heck, I didn't even know about the screen name as I was typing my post... there's almost no way curiousity would let someone stay away.

If it weren't for the Cassie reference, I'd be inclined to think that, by virtue of the other two profiles, we were once again being told to be patient and wait.

Honestly, though, those profile updates were pretty darn mild compared to what he could do... and what I'd be tempted to in his shoes ...

I don't think Apo was confusing at all.

I'm still a bit dumbfounded at the chain of events.

1. A fanfic (OpAphid) gets going really good (which they say they desire) and they officially adopt it and begin incorporating the storyline.

2. So then they advertise it, and get even MORE people ...

Killthesmiley wrote:I miss the random thread jacks

These last few weren't?

Uhhhmmm... I'm really off-topic, huh? :D

Yes, but I'm going to make it worse by adding something. My sister (age 26 now) went through many surgeries as a child, too... and her eyes have gotten worse again the older she's gotten.

They apparently treat it much differently now. One of my sons, and ...

So... did Lad pass the Hat on to Daniel, or is it a case of mistaken hat-dentity?

OK... nobody has put together what I think I saw in quite the same way... so I'll add my two cents.

Daniel was very "with it" at the end of the last vid, trying to get Jonas to get up and be the same. In this vid, we see him getting up, and taking care of the indoor camera.

Then we hear an alarm ...

I'll say it. I wish they'd come back.

The sum of the whole blow-up seems to be exactly that--- things got blown WAY out of proportion. I have yet to see anything that is even mildly-convincing otherwise. Which would suggest that it wasn't necessary for anyone to need to leave.

Then again, it isn't ...

Whew... creepy.

Might be quiet partly because it's still early evening on the west coast... and it's been so absolutely dead in here that it may take most of the evening for the word to get around to those who've been checking in daily still, and might take even longer then that for more to wander ...

A limited yes... I wouldn't mind actual product integration... but the recent candy one was more of a blatent commercial, not the subtle product integration one would see in a film or a television show.

If the beginning had really been all that believable, no one would have been looking for proof it was fake...

Interesting thought... I'm not sure the idea of playing with two names ought to be considered "cheating" though. If people want to be more active, they should be allowed to be.

Somehow I have this impression that we ought to allow the creator of a game their right to make the rules... and determine ...