JustAnotherLonelyGirl. wrote:Anyway, I've been trying to understand exactly what Aleister Crowley did. Did he found Thelema? Or did he simply introduce the themes that eventually led to Thelema? A lot of other belief systems have stemmed out of Crowley's teachings, so I don't quite understand if Thelema is just one among many, the original one, or an inclusion of them all.
Well, first I'd be curious as to which belief systems you consider to have stemmed out of Crowley's teachings. I'm just curious.
As to what Crowley did, he did a lot of cocaine and heroin...buggered grown men..and grown women...and apparently ate lots of curry...
Oh, you don't mean that....
Crowley was the prophet of Thelema. He declared the law of Thelema to the world. He basically started the religion. You can read a lot of his writings at
http://www.tannhaus.com under Thelemic writings. Now, a lot of the ideas espoused in Thelema were not his original ideas. But, he made a congruent whole of it all. Also, as Thelemites, we are individuals. Just because Crowley said it doesn't make it true. You can and will disagree with Crowley on something. We all do.
JustAnotherLonelyGirl. wrote:As for Bree's "religion," do a lot of "secret societies" branch out of Thelema? Do you see this as a realistic possibility? Or is it totally ludicrous? Do many of these societies view Crowley with such admiration?
Well, Thelema comes out of a long line of Western mystery traditions. A lot of the concepts and methods you find practiced by Thelemites actually came from these traditions. Among those practices you will find the Qabalah, the tarot, astrology, skrying, magick, etc. Among those Western mystery traditions you will find the Rosicrucians, the Illuminati, the Golden Dawn, the Theosophical Society, the Freemasons, etc. So, it's only natural for Thelema itself to produce mystery schools of its own...aka secret societies.
As far as viewing Crowley with admiration, you'd have to be a screwed up individual to do so. Crowley had social problems out the wazoo. Also, while he was progressive in many ways, he still had a long way to come. For his time, he was a progressive individual. For now, he shouldn't be idolized, but instead you should take into account the time period he was from and disregard any backwards ideas you find. Many people see Crowley the man and Crowley the prophet as two different personas pretty much.
JustAnotherLonelyGirl. wrote: I don't mean to sound ignorant or skeptical.
Skepticism is good. Don't believe everything you hear or read. Think things over and come to your own conclusions.
93