beast=crowley?

freakish · Post by **freakish** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:50 pm

i dont know if that has been brought up, it probably has considering how obvious it is, but aleister crowley was nicknamed beast...like daniel beast sort of?

also i wanted to include about the affinity jonas seems to have for beast, which kind of fits into the crowley being bisexual thing

MintyBeast · Post by **MintyBeast** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:55 pm

*slow motion noooooooooooooo*

freakish · Post by **freakish** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:07 am

lol...youre kinda funny. i like you.

MintyBeast · Post by **MintyBeast** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:13 am

Why thank you.

longlostposter · Post by **longlostposter** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:38 am

freakish wrote:i dont know if that has been brought up, it probably has considering how obvious it is, but aleister crowley was nicknamed beast...like daniel beast sort of?

also i wanted to include about the affinity jonas seems to have for beast, which kind of fits into the crowley being bisexual thing

Yeah, it's been brought up many times. lol, it's hard to find something that hasn't been posted already.

In addition, I posted this on 2/21:

longlostposter wrote:Book of the Law, Chapter 1 verse 15:

15.
Now ye shall know that the chosen priest & apostle of infinite space is the prince-priest the Beast; and in his woman called the Scarlet Woman is all power given. They shall gather my children into their fold: they shall bring the glory of the stars into the hearts of men.

That's just a little more info to go with it.

silvermoon · Post by **silvermoon** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:47 am

Yeah, I think it's hard for the "newbies" to find things that have been discussed here ages ago -- the threads are burried under so many newer ones.

But the "beast" connection has been discussed quite a bit. If you dig around, you might be able to find them.

A lot of speculation has gone into the fact that Daniel might be "bad" because of the connection.

I'm going with the fact that he is not, purely because I like him, lol!

RoseCrowley · Post by **RoseCrowley** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:06 am

Killthesmiley · Post by **Killthesmiley** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:16 am

silvermoon wrote:Yeah, I think it's hard for the "newbies" to find things that have been discussed here ages ago -- the threads are burried under so many newer ones.

But the "beast" connection has been discussed quite a bit. If you dig around, you might be able to find them.

A lot of speculation has gone into the fact that Daniel might be "bad" because of the connection.

I'm going with the fact that he is not, purely because I like him, lol!

there is a lot of talk about it in the Beast Chat I believe (out of character discussion)

longlostposter · Post by **longlostposter** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:29 am

RoseCrowley wrote:

I've noticed that Rose (Is that you Ms. Kelly?), seems to put this particular smiley in any thread that mentions a possible relationship between DB, Crowley, and the "Beast". Perhaps you'd like to share what you know, Ms. Kelly (errr...Rose) with the rest of us.

EDIT: Spelling

freakish · Post by **freakish** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:01 pm

silvermoon wrote:Yeah, I think it's hard for the "newbies" to find things that have been discussed here ages ago -- the threads are burried under so many newer ones.

But the "beast" connection has been discussed quite a bit. If you dig around, you might be able to find them.

A lot of speculation has gone into the fact that Daniel might be "bad" because of the connection.

I'm going with the fact that he is not, purely because I like him, lol!

psh newbie...that doesnt mean you know any more than i do. kind of frustrating, isnt it?

Lurker · Post by **Lurker** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:07 pm

freakish wrote:psh newbie...that doesnt mean you know any more than i do. kind of frustrating, isnt it?

No need to get defensive over a comment that has proven true with most new posters. I don't believe it was meant to insult you. Many of them create threads on subjects that have long since been discussed, often because they didn't notice that there have already been discussions about it (and I believe some of them actually look before making the new threads; they just don't see where it's already been talked about).

That wasn't a put-down on you from silvermoon. Just an observation that sometimes newer posters miss things that have been talked about already because there's been so many new threads since then. It's often not even their fault, really.

Killthesmiley · Post by **Killthesmiley** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:08 pm

freakish wrote:
silvermoon wrote:Yeah, I think it's hard for the "newbies" to find things that have been discussed here ages ago -- the threads are burried under so many newer ones.

But the "beast" connection has been discussed quite a bit. If you dig around, you might be able to find them.

A lot of speculation has gone into the fact that Daniel might be "bad" because of the connection.

I'm going with the fact that he is not, purely because I like him, lol!

psh newbie...that doesnt mean you know any more than i do. kind of frustrating, isnt it?

huh? that made absolutely no sense.

freakish · Post by **freakish** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:24 pm

i wasnt taking it offensivley, i was just pointing out that despite that im fairly new to this board, even though ive watched the videos since the beginning, we both are at about the same level of understanding whats going on...just because you guys have been posting here longer doesnt mean you are any closer in solving any mysteries than i am

Killthesmiley · Post by **Killthesmiley** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:34 pm

well to enforce what i think everyone has said

all the information that you are looking for we have already found (so i guess we're not at the same point that you are) is already posted in this forum and in the beast chat. You may feel free to look up everything there.

If you don't want to...that is you choice. But if you choose not to...then this thread is pretty pointless don't you agree? lol (joking joking!!! i'm not trying to be a bitch.)

freakish · Post by **freakish** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:36 pm

finnneeeee i guess ill stop trying then.

Lonelygirl15

beast=crowley?

beast=crowley?

Re: beast=crowley?