Cult = The Illuminati

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:40 pm

All the pieces fit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:36 pm

HUETE DIE WELT, MORGEN DAS SONNENSYSTEM

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:57 pm

Sfonzarelli wrote:HUETE DIE WELT, MORGEN DAS SONNENSYSTEM

Wir sind Nachkommen und Erben eines gemeinen Vorfahrs, der das ursprüngliche Rites des bayerischen Illuminati übernimmt, jetzt geübt als die 13 Grad, welche die age-less Klugheit enthalten, die ursprünglich im 18. Jahrhundert verbritten wird.

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:13 pm

trainer101 wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:HUETE DIE WELT, MORGEN DAS SONNENSYSTEM
Wir sind Nachkommen und Erben eines gemeinen Vorfahrs, der das ursprüngliche Rites des bayerischen Illuminati übernimmt, jetzt geübt als die 13 Grad, welche die age-less Klugheit enthalten, die ursprünglich im 18. Jahrhundert verbritten wird.

Did you use Babelfish? Because it's been a while since I studied German, but I'm pretty sure "age-less" is not a German word.

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:18 pm

Sfonzarelli wrote:
trainer101 wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:HUETE DIE WELT, MORGEN DAS SONNENSYSTEM
Wir sind Nachkommen und Erben eines gemeinen Vorfahrs, der das ursprüngliche Rites des bayerischen Illuminati übernimmt, jetzt geübt als die 13 Grad, welche die age-less Klugheit enthalten, die ursprünglich im 18. Jahrhundert verbritten wird.
Did you use Babelfish? Because it's been a while since I studied German, but I'm pretty sure "age-less" is not a German word.

HAHA! Dictionary.com

spaciegirlreturn · Post by **spaciegirlreturn** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:26 pm

do we have to keep threads which are things we've already talked about?

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:34 pm

spaciegirl wrote:do we have to keep threads which are things we've already talked about?

Well, considering that I checked the titles of all the posts under "Plot Discussion" and found no reference to Illuminati in any of them - I would say it's fair to re-introduce it (if, in fact, it had been previously introduced).
You are always welcome to sit this one out.

spaciegirlreturn · Post by **spaciegirlreturn** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:40 pm

I don't think there ever was a thread that had "illuminatti" in the title of it, but it has been discussed..in more than one place I think.

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:46 pm

spaciegirl wrote:I don't think there ever was a thread that had "illuminatti" in the title of it, but it has been discussed..in more than one place I think.

If that's the case, it should have gotten more attention. It encompasses every aspect - from Thelema to Egyptian Mythology to Secret Societies. Plus, since it's largley fictional in it's current incarnation, it can be molded to fit any scenario the Creators want to invent.

katz31 · Post by **katz31** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:50 pm

This was in the "See Also" part of the wikipedia article.

Aleister Crowley (incorporated illuminati into OTO)

Sorry if someone already posted this.

spaciegirlreturn · Post by **spaciegirlreturn** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:52 pm

trainer101 wrote:
spaciegirl wrote:I don't think there ever was a thread that had "illuminatti" in the title of it, but it has been discussed..in more than one place I think.
If that's the case, it should have gotten more attention. It encompasses every aspect - from Thelema to Egyptian Mythology to Secret Societies. Plus, since it's largley fictional in it's current incarnation, it can be molded to fit any scenario the Creators want to invent.

Yeah, that's true...if nothing else, maybe this thread will reach more people than whichever ones the previous discussions were contained in.

trainer101 · Post by **trainer101** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:53 pm

katz31 wrote:This was in the "See Also" part of the wikipedia article.

Aleister Crowley (incorporated illuminati into OTO)

Sorry if someone already posted this.

Exactly. The Illuminati theory is the only one which covers vitually every avenue we've explored.

Sfonzarelli · Post by **Sfonzarelli** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:54 pm

Actually, I don't think the Illumnati has ever been directly discussed on here. It's been alluded to, though, plenty of times.

The Bavarian Illuminati was actually really cool and only has a bad reputation because of right-wing reactionaries.

spaciegirlreturn · Post by **spaciegirlreturn** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm

Sfonzarelli wrote:Actually, I don't think the Illumnati has ever been directly discussed on here. It's been alluded to, though, plenty of times.

The Bavarian Illuminati was actually really cool and only has a bad reputation because of right-wing reactionaries.

well....with ADD, skimming over the topic and getting the main point equals the discussion. God people, don't you understad how to work with me yet?!?

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:43 am

spaciegirl wrote:
Sfonzarelli wrote:Actually, I don't think the Illumnati has ever been directly discussed on here. It's been alluded to, though, plenty of times.

The Bavarian Illuminati was actually really cool and only has a bad reputation because of right-wing reactionaries.
well....with ADD, skimming over the topic and getting the main point equals the discussion. God people, don't you understad how to work with me yet?!?

Damn it. Spaciegirl is right, I think. I remember discussion and debunking of illuminati as well. I think...it's...a...fictional...religion...