I don't hink Bree left, and getting her trait negative

Evan · Post by **Evan** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:18 pm

I think she may have attempted (or suceeded) drowning herself, or someone eles may have attempted (or suceeded) in drowning her.

Also the trait might be virginity... maybe and so maybe they are helping her by having sex? And the are putting on a ploy as far as the drama goes.

hella · Post by **hella** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:28 pm

Evan wrote:I think she may have attempted (or suceeded) drowning herself, or someone eles may have attempted (or suceeded) in drowning her.

Also the trait might be virginity... maybe and so maybe they are helping her by having sex? And the are putting on a ploy as far as the drama goes.

lolol the trait is virginity...jules was trait negative meaning...GROSS! also, virginity isnt a trait

Evan · Post by **Evan** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:57 pm

being a virgin is a trait...

Hannahbee · Post by **Hannahbee** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:01 pm

i don't know, if bree's dad was injecting her with things to try to make her trait negative, i think that kind of rules out virginity...

honestly, with what we know about why bree was wanted (for her high ribozyme levels) and the focus the Order places on science, i'm not sure that we can assume that this "purity bond" thing really does imply that she needs to be a virgin... they may not care.

Sanjay · Post by **Sanjay** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:57 am

On any other forum this would generate about 3 pages of flaming for suggesting something so silly. You're very lucky that people are tolerant here, that virginity suggestion is terrible.

Peace

hella · Post by **hella** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:23 am

being a virgin is not a trait...a trait is genetically inherited which is why they had to get blood samples to check if she was trait negative or positive...you cant check if someone is a virgin from a blood test! theres no part of dna that codes for virginity!

aboriginalgangster · Post by **aboriginalgangster** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:07 am

It's already been established that the trait has something to do with ribozymes. It has been assumed that the purity bond may have something to do with virginity or sex, however I'm still not convinced (it's too obvious, and why would the purity bond have to do with being pure sexually when Aleister Crowley was what one might call a sexual deviant?)

oxdeltaxo · Post by **oxdeltaxo** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:39 am

aboriginalgangster wrote:It's already been established that the trait has something to do with ribozymes. It has been assumed that the purity bond may have something to do with virginity or sex, however I'm still not convinced (it's too obvious, and why would the purity bond have to do with being pure sexually when Aleister Crowley was what one might call a sexual deviant?)

The purity bond had more to do with psychological control than with the traits. You keep them from going all rebel on ya and the order has already won half the battle.

Skunkwaffle · Post by **Skunkwaffle** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:21 am

Hannahbee wrote:i don't know, if bree's dad was injecting her with things to try to make her trait negative, i think that kind of rules out virginity...

...must ...resist ...need ...to be gross

...must ...stay ....PG13

GAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!

Aponi · Post by **Aponi** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:36 am

Skunkwaffle wrote:
Hannahbee wrote:i don't know, if bree's dad was injecting her with things to try to make her trait negative, i think that kind of rules out virginity...
...must ...resist ...need ...to be gross

...must ...stay ....PG13

GAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!

Wait that is so nasty

But still funny

eyemeey · Post by **eyemeey** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:39 am

how would she have drowned? you mean in the shower?

if so, wouldn't she still be dead... in the shower? or do you think she went down the drain or something?

Evan · Post by **Evan** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:43 am

eyemeey wrote:how would she have drowned? you mean in the shower?

if so, wouldn't she still be dead... in the shower? or do you think she went down the drain or something?

No, we never saw down into it, did we? Also I just wanna say that I don't apprecciate the bashing I am getting. You could have said it nicer.

Spades · Post by **Spades** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:37 pm

She drowned herself? I'm not too sure if I understand that.

Virginity is more of an idea than an actual thing. It is just a word.

staticmorning · Post by **staticmorning** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:03 pm

oxdeltaxo wrote:The purity bond had more to do with psychological control than with the traits. You keep them from going all rebel on ya and the order has already won half the battle.

i agree. its easier to get someone who feels as though they HAVE TO do whatever the adults in their life tell them to listen to.. well, an adult.
if they frequently disobey the rules, with only groundings or small punishments, its going to make it harder to 'control' them in the end.

make the reward more appealing (maintaining a sacred bond with your parents vs being able to go out) and youll get a much more well behaved 'child..'

hella · Post by **hella** » Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:27 am

i also wanted to add again just to make it completely clear that virginity is not a trait.

Lonelygirl15

I don't hink Bree left, and getting her trait negative

I don't hink Bree left, and getting her trait negative

Re: I don't hink Bree left, and getting her trait negative