[DROP CONTENTS] I Get Around - Santa Cruz [5/26/07]
Moderator: Moderators
Nice work cainam and TOSG!TOSG wrote:Cainam, you were on the right track. I just decoded what was in the second-to-top box to get "2vre6z"
http://tinyurl.com/2vre6z , which leads to http://myspace.com/filiascientis
Looks like we've got a new character!
I checked the myspace page; so far there isn't much info on it and there are no additional pictures besides the main one.
- trainer101
- Moderator Manager
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:29 pm
- Location: Wasting away again ILLUMINATIVILLE...
- RedRevolver
- Devoted Fan
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 2:43 pm
Oh, sorry.Musique wrote:RedRevolver wrote:Well, there is a phoenix in The Tower of the Crowley deck, like in the hand drawn card.Musique wrote: Personally, I wouldn't touch the Thoth deck with a ten foot pole.
Crowley is also a big part of the LG15 plot.
LOL I meant I personally would not physically touch the actual deck, nor use it for readings. There haven't been any doubts in my mind that someone is using the Thoth deck as a reference (and tie-in to LG15).

But your research was very interesting still.
KateModern or we eat YOUR children.
*who is we?*
Uhm...me...and...my other personalities?...=|...
*who is we?*
Uhm...me...and...my other personalities?...=|...
- RedRevolver
- Devoted Fan
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 2:43 pm
Awww, your Scottish friend is cute.Aja wrote:DROP VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7-zaMNrRlQ
Romy, you might want to add that link to the first post?
And a great video, btw.
KateModern or we eat YOUR children.
*who is we?*
Uhm...me...and...my other personalities?...=|...
*who is we?*
Uhm...me...and...my other personalities?...=|...
- RedRevolver
- Devoted Fan
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 2:43 pm
Sorry for the triple post but great work, guys.TOSG wrote:Cainam, you were on the right track. I just decoded what was in the second-to-top box to get "2vre6z"
http://tinyurl.com/2vre6z , which leads to http://myspace.com/filiascientis
Looks like we've got a new character!
KateModern or we eat YOUR children.
*who is we?*
Uhm...me...and...my other personalities?...=|...
*who is we?*
Uhm...me...and...my other personalities?...=|...
Wow Aja, that was ARGsome! fantARGstic! mARGvellous! lolAja wrote:DROP VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7-zaMNrRlQ
Romy, you might want to add that link to the first post?
Loved the intro, with morse and Google Earth and even Op-ish sound effects, loved the footage, and the music was perfect! "French-kissed a girl from LA" Yay!
And you're hot!


So, I may need a nudge or two here. First, I decoded the morse to something like BC-TA0WBC031BC-TA0WBC ...huh

Gave up on cryptanalysis for that, so now I'm working on the Scottish... I tried analysing the frequency spectrum and applying a hidden Markov model-based speech recognition algorithm. Here's a simple explanation:
That's the gist of it, although I've used a few more things that are mentioned in the next paragraph of the link above. I've adapted the acoustic model with signature scottish vowel system phonemes, but I didn't change the default language model as I'm assuming Scottish follows a very similar grammar as English.In speech recognition, to give the very simplest setup possible, the hidden Markov model would output a sequence of n-dimensional real-valued vectors with n around, say, 13, outputting one of these every 10 milliseconds. The vectors, again in the very simplest case, would consist of cepstral coefficients, which are obtained by taking a Fourier transform of a short-time window of speech and decorrelating the spectrum using a cosine transform, then taking the first (most significant) coefficients. The hidden Markov model will tend to have, in each state, a statistical distribution called a mixture of diagonal covariance Gaussians which will give a likelihood for each observed vector. Each word, or (for more general speech recognition systems), each phoneme, will have a different output distribution; a hidden Markov model for a sequence of words or phonemes is made by concatenating the individual trained hidden Markov models for the separate words and phonemes.
My most promising finding implies that Scotland is probably a lonely, quiet place.
Don't worry, I'm joking. Of course I did none of that... well, just the morse.

Unused Morse strings
On the card, enclosing the tinyurl code in both cases, are the morse sequences
-.-.-
and
.-.-.
The first of these has no morse interpretation as a whole, but if you add spaces, can be taken to be any of the following:
TAA
TRT
TETET
NNT
NK
KA
KET
CT
I think this is all of them, please point out if I missed any.
The first of these (TAA) seemed most promising, but cainam pointed out (I think it was cainam; sorry, it was late!) that this is the ochre stop sequence. Perhaps this will be relevant later on, as a vigenere key or cipher, or something completely different.
While the other mysterious sequence (.-.-.) also has no direct alphanumeric interpretation, it does mean '+'. The approach of sticking in spaces gives the following possibilities (again, please jump in if I missed any)
ETETE
ENN
EKE
EC
AETE
AEN
AR
RN
RTE
None of these seem to me like they would be relevant, which makes me think that maybe this isn't the right thing to do with these morse strings. In any case, I wanted to make sure there was a record of going down this path, either to prevent duplication of work or to spark a fruitful brainstorm.
It also strikes me that those two codes are complementary to one another. Don't know what to make of it, but it seems like it could be relevant.
In any case, I'm certain that these ten bits of data are important, since they show up in both places on the card.
-.-.-
and
.-.-.
The first of these has no morse interpretation as a whole, but if you add spaces, can be taken to be any of the following:
TAA
TRT
TETET
NNT
NK
KA
KET
CT
I think this is all of them, please point out if I missed any.
The first of these (TAA) seemed most promising, but cainam pointed out (I think it was cainam; sorry, it was late!) that this is the ochre stop sequence. Perhaps this will be relevant later on, as a vigenere key or cipher, or something completely different.
While the other mysterious sequence (.-.-.) also has no direct alphanumeric interpretation, it does mean '+'. The approach of sticking in spaces gives the following possibilities (again, please jump in if I missed any)
ETETE
ENN
EKE
EC
AETE
AEN
AR
RN
RTE
None of these seem to me like they would be relevant, which makes me think that maybe this isn't the right thing to do with these morse strings. In any case, I wanted to make sure there was a record of going down this path, either to prevent duplication of work or to spark a fruitful brainstorm.
It also strikes me that those two codes are complementary to one another. Don't know what to make of it, but it seems like it could be relevant.
In any case, I'm certain that these ten bits of data are important, since they show up in both places on the card.
scientia ex silico
From http://homepages.tesco.net/~a.wadsworth/MBcode.htmphipunk wrote:On the card, enclosing the tinyurl code in both cases, are the morse sequences
-.-.-
and
.-.-.
PROCEDURAL SIGNALS
__
Wait (AS) __ didahdididit .-...
Understood (SN) __ didididahdit ...-.
End of message__(AR) didahdidahdit .-.-.
End of work (SK) __ didididahdidah ...-.-
Starting signal (KA) dahdidahdidah -.-.-
Invitation to transmit (K) dahdidah -.-
Short pause (for thought?) (II) didit didit .. ..
General call to any station (CQ) dahdidahdit dahdahdidah -.-. --.-
Closing down (CL) dahdidahdit didahdidit -.-. .-..
Thanks. I had a feeling that was all they were. I couldn't find that sort of information on a first pass of searching, and was about to contact a friend of mine in the Navy. Should have known you'd already be on top of it.deagol wrote:From http://homepages.tesco.net/~a.wadsworth/MBcode.htmphipunk wrote:On the card, enclosing the tinyurl code in both cases, are the morse sequences
-.-.-
and
.-.-.
PROCEDURAL SIGNALS
__
Wait (AS) __ didahdididit .-...
Understood (SN) __ didididahdit ...-.
End of message__(AR) didahdidahdit .-.-.
End of work (SK) __ didididahdidah ...-.-
Starting signal (KA) dahdidahdidah -.-.-
Invitation to transmit (K) dahdidah -.-
Short pause (for thought?) (II) didit didit .. ..
General call to any station (CQ) dahdidahdit dahdahdidah -.-. --.-
Closing down (CL) dahdidahdit didahdidit -.-. .-..
scientia ex silico
Is it just me, or is the misspelling of "vial" as "vail" worth considering? It seems like someone with the patience to write out morse code hidden in a picture on an index card would take the time to proof and correct a note like this.
But, Vail being a ski town in Colorado, I have no idea how that fits in with anything we've seen so far.
But, Vail being a ski town in Colorado, I have no idea how that fits in with anything we've seen so far.
scientia ex silico