watchingall wrote:
Excuse me but I never said No ifs ands or butts about it. Thanks for stepping up that maturity level and calling me names! Bravo!
All I said is the fact that he was mentioned points really heavily towards him being cannon. I never said anything at all about his production value etc
If youre going to take it so seriously, you know, your nerves being shot and all, maybe you need to take a step away from the ol computer. You sound a little tense. Take a few deep breaths and practice some relaxation techniques. Then repeat after me, "This is just an internet game, I will not call people names over their opinions"
And BTW, i will be looking for an apology if he is proven cannon. You seem to have a problem with anyone who thinks he is cute. Should I turn around and call everyone who thinks Daniel is cute is an ... what was it? oh yeah... an "ass"?
looking back I realize that all this may not have been pointed at me. But if it wasnt why did you quote me?
Because I was using an example. It wasn't pointed at you. The only part pointed at you was that making a bold statement, such as you know he's cannon and there can be no rebuttle to your opinion(when you say no ifs, ands, or buts about it, that's saying no one can argue this). Yes, I was calling you an ass. I call them as I see them. Saying no-one can rebut you is being an ass. That's not name calling, that's just the truth, dear. (I wasn't calling you that for thinking Jonas is cute, I didn't know you thought that). And the only way I'd apologize, is if you didn't mean to say that no one is allowed to have a different opinion than yours, and I'm just taking it wrong. Otherwise, my statement stands.
As for the prodcution values thing: At least three other people on the forum have said he's cannon because of production values and editing. I was just putting that out there because it's an annoying arguement that can be a complete coincidence.
Oh,and I've been away from the computer all day, I'm just on now because I consider it a fun activity. Stepping off when I get right back on because someone thinks I'm taking a game too seriously would be a first for me.
Please show me where I said I KNOW he is cannon and I'll apologize. I can point you to several posters who KNOW Jonas is cannon. Im not one of them. In fact this is exactly what I said.
"watchingall wrote:
Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p"
Basically my two sentence statement was I had no idea if he fit in or not but I didnt mind watching him cause he's kinda cute.
Which makes me wonder if you read my post at all. In your reply you said I knew he was cannon, there could be no rebuttle and you didnt notice me saying he was cute.
Any chance you quoted the wrong person?
...
Now I feel like an Idiot, I meant to quote the opening post..
Falls wrote:
Because I was using an example. It wasn't pointed at you. The only part pointed at you was that making a bold statement, such as you know he's cannon and there can be no rebuttle to your opinion(when you say no ifs, ands, or buts about it, that's saying no one can argue this). Yes, I was calling you an ass. I call them as I see them. Saying no-one can rebut you is being an ass. That's not name calling, that's just the truth, dear. (I wasn't calling you that for thinking Jonas is cute, I didn't know you thought that). And the only way I'd apologize, is if you didn't mean to say that no one is allowed to have a different opinion than yours, and I'm just taking it wrong. Otherwise, my statement stands.
As for the prodcution values thing: At least three other people on the forum have said he's cannon because of production values and editing. I was just putting that out there because it's an annoying arguement that can be a complete coincidence.
Oh,and I've been away from the computer all day, I'm just on now because I consider it a fun activity. Stepping off when I get right back on because someone thinks I'm taking a game too seriously would be a first for me.
Please show me where I said I KNOW he is cannon and I'll apologize. I can point you to several posters who KNOW Jonas is cannon. Im not one of them. In fact this is exactly what I said.
"watchingall wrote:
Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p"
Basically my two sentence statement was I had no idea if he fit in or not but I didnt mind watching him cause he's kinda cute.
Which makes me wonder if you read my post at all. In your reply you said I knew he was cannon, there could be no rebuttle and you didnt notice me saying he was cute.
Any chance you quoted the wrong person?
...
Now I feel like an Idiot, I meant to quote the opening post..
Geez, I'm really sorry.
._.
This is awkward, but funny.
It is amusing that we can look back over it. Im glad we got that straightened out! Now, Im not really an ass, am i?
Frankly Im leaning towards Jonas being cannon. I'd never come out and say OMG JONAS IS CANNON NOW KISS MY FEET CAUSE IM RIGHT! *laughing* But I do feel he is. I may be wrong. If I am thats ok too - it certainly won't be the first time and I highly doubt it is the last.
Im being entertained by LG et al and at the end of the day, thats all that matters.
watchingall wrote:
Please show me where I said I KNOW he is cannon and I'll apologize. I can point you to several posters who KNOW Jonas is cannon. Im not one of them. In fact this is exactly what I said.
"watchingall wrote:
Well if he IS cannon, Im certainly going to enjoy watching him over Daniel. Sorry Daniel and Daniel fans... Jonas is a lot cuter and much more fun to watch!
How does he fit in? SHOULD he fit in? *shrug* For pure eye candy, this is ok with me! :p"
Basically my two sentence statement was I had no idea if he fit in or not but I didnt mind watching him cause he's kinda cute.
Which makes me wonder if you read my post at all. In your reply you said I knew he was cannon, there could be no rebuttle and you didnt notice me saying he was cute.
Any chance you quoted the wrong person?
...
Now I feel like an Idiot, I meant to quote the opening post..
Geez, I'm really sorry.
._.
This is awkward, but funny.
It is amusing that we can look back over it. Im glad we got that straightened out! Now, Im not really an ass, am i?
Frankly Im leaning towards Jonas being cannon. I'd never come out and say OMG JONAS IS CANNON NOW KISS MY FEET CAUSE IM RIGHT! *laughing* But I do feel he is. I may be wrong. If I am thats ok too - it certainly won't be the first time and I highly doubt it is the last.
Im being entertained by LG et al and at the end of the day, thats all that matters.
xD I'm still sorry 'bout that mess.
You don't seem liek an ass, but you might be Tachyon, considering your fluxuating use of "I/i"! lol.
I think he might be canon, like anyone would, I'm just trying to disprove it at all, if I can.
I don't know if I agree that they are related, but the whole theory that they are a reflection of each other I like! I think because bree has been so sheltered she's never experienced another male companion or attention for that matter other than Danial. So if this new uber hot character comes in, thats never had to worry about anyone else but himself but finds himself caring for the beautiful Bree.... who knows! I like this theory I hope they do go stay with him...it'd be a hell of a lot better then this whole "we're living in a hotel" crap.
I, for one, do think he's canon because of his character's sheer... convenience, at this time in the plot.
Bree and Daniel are living out of motels, and probably fast running out of money. The entire plot revolves around their interactions with each other and 3 stuffed animals, and sporadically running away from men in black suits. Only other real character lives in "London", so not much potential for interaction there.
In comes Jonas with his Big Empty Unsupervised Mansion House. And wads and wads of cash. And loads of time on his hands, and no life or friends to speak of.
I think it's interesting about how he is a foil to Gemma. She is order and he is Chaos. He also DOES seem like a boy version of Bree--playful but lonely, and emotionally immature.
I am willing to bet that he is in fact canon, and that Bree and Daniel will end of staying with him. It's been brought up before that some of the fans should let the two crash with them. Well now we have a ready-made lonelygirl "fan" introduced into the Breeniverse.
I don't think there will be a full love triangle though, although there might be a partial one with either Jonas hitting on Bree or Daniel getting inordinately jealous. Bree is too immature to handle ONE relationship, not to mention TWO. Also, Danielbeast's done too much for her to the point that he's pretty much her guardian.
Even though his character is a rich trust fund brat, I like Jonas. I think starting out so immature gives him room for improvement. And yes, his puppy-dog-eyes do play a part.
I don't know if this is off topic or not, I'm not sure where to post this.
Up till now part of the suspension of disbelief we have had to engage in is that Bree's parents and the people who are after her, the Deacons, The Order, etc., are unaware of this website or Youtube or any of the other websites where these videos are posted.
Hence Bree can post a video about sneaking out to a party without worrying about her parents seeing it, or Daniel can post a video about B&E without worrying about Lucy seeing it.
But now that OpAphid is canon isn't that premise thoroughly compromised. OpAphid is definitely Internet savvy, with their postings on Youtube and in the video responses to this site not to mention the ARGs which are Internet based.
Don't we now have to assume that OpAphid and The Order see everything that Bree, Daniel, Gemma, and now Jonas post.
Falls wrote: And while my gender will remain a secret, I will tell you that I am attracted to guys. Not this guy, though. I'm not really into homosexuals.
If you like guys...and you're not into homosexual guys...wouldn't that make you a girl?
Falls wrote: And while my gender will remain a secret, I will tell you that I am attracted to guys. Not this guy, though. I'm not really into homosexuals.
If you like guys...and you're not into homosexual guys...wouldn't that make you a girl?
Falls wrote: And while my gender will remain a secret, I will tell you that I am attracted to guys. Not this guy, though. I'm not really into homosexuals.
If you like guys...and you're not into homosexual guys...wouldn't that make you a girl?
