Crowley's missing in 'The DanielBeast'

skellykat · Post by **skellykat** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:28 am

Not sure if anyone has noticed this yet or not, but I rewatched The DanielBeast (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opTMvpmWX3o) and it looks like the photo of Crowley is either covered up or it's a picture of something else.

Any ideas on why they did that? Delaying suspicion perhaps?

Then it suddenly shows up in 'Daniel Returns, and more interesting factoids' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58zh4Lby8Qc).

Hmm!

Maybe somebody noticed this already, I don't know. I'm too lazy to search for it.

love_leslie · Post by **love_leslie** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:30 am

The first time that you can even see the picture on Bree's wall is in "the Danielbeast." The next time you see the picture is in "Daniel returns...." and it is the picture of Crowley.

Woo · Post by **Woo** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:31 am

someone said originally it was a picture of satan, but then they decided it was too obvious so changed it to Crowley!

milowent · Post by **milowent** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:24 pm

the fact that there is a different picture on the wall in the danielbeast video was also discussed on the old forum and the unofficial forum:

http://alissabrooke.proboards56.com/ind ... 1157435360

here is a pic from the danielbeast video, it doesn't look like satan to me.

http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k225/ ... llpic2.jpg

maxuz · Post by **maxuz** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:35 pm

its baphomet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet

scroll down a bit to the picture, looks like the same one to me.

crowley connection.

milowent · Post by **milowent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:40 am

maxuz - it doesn't like like that baphomet picture AT ALL!

ravensgrace · Post by **ravensgrace** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:00 am

maxuz wrote:its baphomet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet

scroll down a bit to the picture, looks like the same one to me.

crowley connection.

Yes, that is the very picture they used.

Here's an interesting page.

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:07 am

I could never see that old picture clearly enough to make any guesses...is there a better or clearer shot of it...or...is the baphomet thing mere speculation?

milowent · Post by **milowent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:54 am

here's a blowup of the old pic. it looks an old family pic with 3 people in it to me.

http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k225/ ... llpic2.jpg

i just don't see it looking ANYTHING like that baphomet picture. others have said that before on both forums, but i just don't see it.

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:32 am

Thanks! I still can't tell for sure what it is, it's so obscured...I wouldn't insist on it being baphomet...as it's impossible to tell. Maybe it's nothing, but they changed it to add to the mystery as an afterthought on stage.

maxuz · Post by **maxuz** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:53 am

the 3 circled things are negative space in that picture. the top 2 circles are the white around the head, the one further down to the right is the space between his head and hand.

look as the large black spot directly in the top middle of the pic to orient yourself. sliding down on the right then, the next dark spot is the wing. from there you can get a grasp of it. if its not the exact picture on wikipedia, its another similar one. i'd bet money though, thats baphomet.

milowent · Post by **milowent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:05 pm

the picture is slightly sharper in the revver.com version of this video:
http://www.revver.com/view.php?id=62853

--------
http://milowent.blogspot.com

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:05 am

Edward Alexander "Aleister" Crowley, deployed the name not only as his title within the O.T.O. but also incorporated the tradition of Templar symbolism within that of the Gnostic Catholic Church. Crowley did not accept wholeheartedly Eliphas Levi's conflation of the evil-looking Baphomet fantasized as the object of the anti-Knights Templar accusations with Harpocrates, the Ram of Mendes — for the 16th major trump card of Crowley's tarot deck, produced in collaboration with Frieda Harris, depicts the Ram standing beneath a stylized phallus, as a friendly four-legged, multi-eyed animal-god, not a demonic half-human hermaphrodite.

Way2Curious · Post by **Way2Curious** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:28 am

I happened to find a picture that looks alot like the one that was replaced by Aleister Crowley. A family photo of Aleister Crowley, his wife Rose and one of their children.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rose ... rowley.jpg

It looks like it could be reversed, other than that it looks very similar to me.

It came from the wiki page about Rose Kelly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Edith_Kelly

edit:

I reversed the image and added a frame shape, so that you can better see the similarity.
Rose Kelly, Aleister Crowley and a child

here is the one from Bree's wall.

edit: If anyone else sees the similarity, will you please post a reply?
Its been a couple of days since I posted this and I'm starting to think that I'm crazy...

iqfrenzy · Post by **iqfrenzy** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:38 pm

Way2Curious wrote:I happened to find a picture that looks alot like the one that was replaced by Aleister Crowley. A family photo of Aleister Crowley, his wife Rose and one of their children.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rose ... rowley.jpg

It looks like it could be reversed, other than that it looks very similar to me.

It came from the wiki page about Rose Kelly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Edith_Kelly

edit:

I reversed the image and added a frame shape, so that you can better see the similarity.
Rose Kelly, Aleister Crowley and a child

here is the one from Bree's wall.

edit: If anyone else sees the similarity, will you please post a reply?
Its been a couple of days since I posted this and I'm starting to think that I'm crazy...

I see it, and I think you are right. Probably people just lost interest in the thread.