Lonelistic Physics: Why there are no plot holes.

Spades · Post by **Spades** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:14 am

I'm lovin' this. I can almost see some kind of 50's style "Science and Industry" film happening here.

cup o' noodles · Post by **cup o' noodles** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:30 am

Aw, someone should SO make that!

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:36 am

I'll do it if I can find my lab coat...

Anyways, I do think that my colleagues have advanced my theories far beyond what I had originally conceived.

Spades · Post by **Spades** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:48 am

Still, come on, it would be pretty funny, and stating the same thing over and over again in different ways would be pretty absurd and funny in a way (Like the Dead Parrot Sketch from Monty Python).

Plus, I do not know if anyone would even understand what you are saying.

cup o' noodles · Post by **cup o' noodles** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:52 am

Oh my god, Kenny, that avatar is HOT! I love the Transformers.

My friends try to convince me to get a tattoo that says "Autobots 4 Life" but I'm not that obsessed (and stupid).

Spades · Post by **Spades** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:10 am

Wow, my last post was stupid as hell. Let's just right it off as me trying to repeat myself to be funny?

Crap, I look like an ass.

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:42 am

Spades wrote:Crap, I look like an ass.

I think this is merely a side effect of the preon plot and you do not, in fact, look like an ass.

'mute

giddeanx · Post by **giddeanx** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:16 am

I still agree with the original argument. That there is no plot hole because there is no plot. We are on what I call a flat arch.

Imagine throwing toilet paper:

A arch created when you through an idea wildly in any given direction hoping it comes into contact with something of meaningful substance. If the idea hits something meaningful the arch coats it with its idea and the arch itself becomes meaningful. A flat arch is created when you miss a meaningful structure and your idea lies unmeaningfully on the ground.

A arch in this type of platform must be a meaningful arch due to the constant parcipitation of comments from its viewers. If a arch is meaningful then the comments will only make the idea's stick more. If it is flat you will not be able to determine what the idea was in the first place.

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:14 pm

giddeanx wrote:I still agree with the original argument. That there is no plot hole because there is no plot. We are on what I call a flat arch.

Imagine throwing toilet paper:

A arch created when you through an idea wildly in any given direction hoping it comes into contact with something of meaningful substance. If the idea hits something meaningful the arch coats it with its idea and the arch itself becomes meaningful. A flat arch is created when you miss a meaningful structure and your idea lies unmeaningfully on the ground.

A arch in this type of platform must be a meaningful arch due to the constant parcipitation of comments from its viewers. If a arch is meaningful then the comments will only make the idea's stick more. If it is flat you will not be able to determine what the idea was in the first place.

But can we all agree that there was a plot at one point?

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:18 pm

ghost_of_kenny wrote:But can we all agree that there was a plot at one point?

Are we talking singularities again? I thought that theory had already been disproved.

'mute

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:26 pm

wintermute wrote:Are we talking singularities again? I thought that theory had already been disproved.

'mute

I mean, that there was a plot at one point, but there is not one now.

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:28 pm

ghost_of_kenny wrote:
wintermute wrote:Are we talking singularities again? I thought that theory had already been disproved.

'mute
I mean, that there was a plot at one point, but there is not one now.

Ah... So the singularity disappeared? I certainly believe that to be the case.

'mute

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:33 pm

wintermute wrote:Ah... So the singularity disappeared? I certainly believe that to be the case.

'mute

We must first determine whether or not the singularity collapsed onto itself, or if it merely blipped out of existence due to quantum physics. As we all know, the laws of quantum mechanics, there is a very very very very very small probability that the singularity could simply disappear. Is it possible that this happened?

Post by **wintermute** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:36 pm

Perhaps someone simply came along and stuck the singularity into a box, along with a cat...

'mute

ghost_of_kenny · Post by **ghost_of_kenny** » Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:08 am

wintermute wrote:Perhaps someone simply came along and stuck the singularity into a box, along with a cat...

'mute

A dead cat or a live cat? Or a cat that exists as both alive and dead until the box is opened at which point it assumes one of those states?