Lurker wrote:Really, removing all of those posts would — in the interest of fairness — require removing all posts like
this,
this,
this,
this,
this,
this,
this, or
this as being posts that aren't exactly "on topic" in the strictest sense.
Yep. And your problem with that idea is . . . ?
Lurker wrote:Obviously, though, they all are still authentic discussion related to the video itself
It's not at all obvious to me -- at least with regard to the posts that throw shipper comments in on a random basis.
Lurker wrote:just as many "Jonas/Daniel was sooo cute in this video" (emphasis added) comments arguably are.
"Arguably," indeed. I'd certainly argue with that premise.
Lurker wrote:It would also lead to either feelings that forum members aren't free to share their thoughts . . .
I don't see how making a section to "share thoughts" about who should hook up with whom, and asking posters to keep those thoughts to the proper section, is more objectionable than asking posters to keep political remarks to the "Off the Cuff" section, or speculation about The New Girl to the "New Girl" section, or questions from newbies like "Who is this Bree chick anyway?" to the "New to LG15? Start Here!" section.
Lurker wrote:. . . or it would just cause them to add a small extra comment about the video to their posts where they talk about how cute a character is or how much they'd like to see one character get together with another. Really, it would probably lead to having to read or skim over even more stuff you're not particularly interested in seeing.
On the contrary, I would
hope that it would cause forumites to realize that shipper talk belongs in its place, just as other OT conversation belongs in the appropriate place(s), and to respect other forumites by keeping their shipper discussions where they belong.
After all, I don't recall seeing people -- regardless of how passionate they are about politics -- posting messages like "God, I really hope the Senate manages to pass that vote of no confidence against Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and that he steps down even if Bush doesn't fire him. Oh, and hey, how
'bout that latest video?"
Lurker wrote:It would also be a nightmare for the mods trying to determine what does or doesn't meet the criteria for removal in a fast-moving thread when the server's lagging due to high traffic.
I'm not advocating that the mods be required to keep up with the discussion in real time. In fact, I can't imagine that being a workable procedure for mods to follow in any case -- even in extreme cases like the whole Glenn Debacle.
I will point out that the mods do seem to be overly enthusiastic about moving posts they consider "OT" to the Rubbish Bin. (That, to my surprise, was where I found my original discussion with Garnet about shipper posts.) I would like to see the mods exercising their OT power for good for a change.