Suspicious Posters...A Test?

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:00 am

Just one second guys.

With the revelation that Nikki Bower is actually an actress (something we've all assumed and hoped for), doesn't it make this theory seem more possible?

Nikki posts on here..replies to comments...and just like Jonas said he was, she is a watcher of the LG series. She's been 'following' everything just like we have...but she is on the LG payroll.

Isn't it more possible while knowing this to think that it is possible that these suspicious posters, the few that blatently speak poorly of Bree or the creators, would in fact just be plants by OpAphid, trying to turn us away from the series?

How big is the LG world? Are we all just characters (with the exception of not being paid)?

If so, how many others are out there?

Killthesmiley · Post by **Killthesmiley** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:29 am

nobackspacebutton wrote:Just one second guys.

With the revelation that Nikki Bower is actually an actress (something we've all assumed and hoped for), doesn't it make this theory seem more possible?

Nikki posts on here..replies to comments...and just like Jonas said he was, she is a watcher of the LG series. She's been 'following' everything just like we have...but she is on the LG payroll.

Isn't it more possible while knowing this to think that it is possible that these suspicious posters, the few that blatently speak poorly of Bree or the creators, would in fact just be plants by OpAphid, trying to turn us away from the series?

How big is the LG world? Are we all just characters (with the exception of not being paid)?

If so, how many others are out there?

sweetheart are you stoned??? lol this sounds like stoned slur!
lol.
I think your just looking too hard.
I just thought it was a neat coincidence.....

but then again I did suggest that they do exsactly what you are saying.........

hmmm.

itsreallyreal · Post by **itsreallyreal** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:39 am

I wanted to just point out that allot of the newbs have shown up SINCE McFever was a guest star... Could just be a small surge in popularity...

But I am not ruling out the chance we have secret posters at all!!!

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:41 am

Killthesmiley wrote:
sweetheart are you stoned???

lol

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:33 pm

itsreallyreal wrote:I wanted to just point out that allot of the newbs have shown up SINCE McFever was a guest star... Could just be a small surge in popularity...

But I am not ruling out the chance we have secret posters at all!!!

Honey, as we've stated...this isn't about just new posters. It's about the posters that are new, post something very intriguing and then never post again. Not just new people, etc.

AutoPilate · Post by **AutoPilate** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:51 pm

Kas, you must've missed this part, or not let it sink in:

itsreallyreal wrote:But I am not ruling out the chance we have secret posters at all!!!

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:10 pm

No, I got it...it's just people keep bringing up why we have so many new posters...when that was never part of the issue. Get it?

AutoPilate · Post by **AutoPilate** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:16 pm

Of course I get it, but the person was only bringing up a minor point, then dropped it. Just makes me wonder why you chose to quote him in your crusade to demonstrate that new posters aren't the issue.

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:32 pm

Oh jesus christ, talk about blowing it out or proportion. Why do you crusade for people when they can simply reply to me themselves?

freedomishere · Post by **freedomishere** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:33 pm

It could just be that these "suspicious posters" are just attention-hungry teenyboppers who only post with "relevant" information to make us all squirm and suspect things that aren't really there.

It does seem like it's too much of a coincidence though.

(Also, I am aware that I am "suspiciously absent". I've lurked around for a very long time but only now am I starting to throw in my two cents.)

AutoPilate · Post by **AutoPilate** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:34 pm

Kasdeja wrote:Oh jesus christ, talk about blowing it out or proportion. Why do you crusade for people when they can simply reply to me themselves?

I wasn't. I made an observation, you commented on it with a question, I replied. The End.

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:36 pm

freedomishere wrote:It could just be that these "suspicious posters" are just attention-hungry teenyboppers who only post with "relevant" information to make us all squirm and suspect things that aren't really there.

It does seem like it's too much of a coincidence though.

(Also, I am aware that I am "suspiciously absent". I've lurked around for a very long time but only now am I starting to throw in my two cents.)

Yeah, but you aren't posting crazily connected links that nobody has ever been able to find before and then leaving, lol. PLANT.

j/k

freedomishere · Post by **freedomishere** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm

Kasdeja wrote:
freedomishere wrote:It could just be that these "suspicious posters" are just attention-hungry teenyboppers who only post with "relevant" information to make us all squirm and suspect things that aren't really there.

It does seem like it's too much of a coincidence though.

(Also, I am aware that I am "suspiciously absent". I've lurked around for a very long time but only now am I starting to throw in my two cents.)
Yeah, but you aren't posting crazily connected links that nobody has ever been able to find before and then leaving, lol. PLANT. j/k

Haha, fair enough.

itsreallyreal · Post by **itsreallyreal** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:47 pm

Yeah I am sure that the PM's have used a "Well Plased Post or Poster" from times to times... it is the most sensable thing to do when important plot points have been missed and need to be reviited... But confronting them won;t helop anyone... WSo why not just look into what they say

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:50 pm

I view it as heeding Ops warning about hte forum being infiltrated, IRR. We kinda let those in question know that we know...and we also have an easy way to bring attention to others for them to watch, too. Some of these "suspiciously absent" posters may be giving a big clue...one that we shouldn't discard on the assumption that they are just the run of the mill "noob".