Gemma Part 2

Cassie_xx · Post by **Cassie_xx** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:41 pm

Where exactly is the proof that she's dead?

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:42 pm

There's never any proof. But there is Brother's video of him targeting her with a gun. Now her page says mission accomplished.

Beckers · Post by **Beckers** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 9:23 am

We don't even know if her mission was to kill Gemma....she could have been following her to get to someone else.

Joyleaf · Post by **Joyleaf** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:01 am

Kasdeja wrote:There's never any proof. But there is Brother's video of him targeting her with a gun. Now her page says mission accomplished.

There's also a Tachyon email that refers to her "sending one of your kind" [she was referring to the sender of the email as one of Brother's crazy ex-girlfriends] "on a permanent vacation soon."

Not that it's proof, but "permanent vacation" usually puts me in mind of mobsters with cement shoes.

Kasdeja · Post by **Kasdeja** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:28 am

Joyleaf wrote:
Kasdeja wrote:There's never any proof. But there is Brother's video of him targeting her with a gun. Now her page says mission accomplished.
There's also a Tachyon email that refers to her "sending one of your kind" [she was referring to the sender of the email as one of Brother's crazy ex-girlfriends] "on a permanent vacation soon."

Not that it's proof, but "permanent vacation" usually puts me in mind of mobsters with cement shoes.

Exactly. Proof? Not really...but it sure makes more sense than her not being dead or Brother's mission NOT being to take out Gemma.

impulse · Post by **impulse** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:18 am

.....So. A little while ago, the writers of this show introduced a new character named Gemma. Because of bad writing for this part, the character never was given a chance to fully develop and meet an audience, not even talking about a fan base. Therefore, like any respectful entertainment company, LG15 corp. sacrificed the young doe-eyed actress who was given the part for the benefits of blood-thirsty PMs of a violent ARG which educational purpose aims at the proper use of sniper rifles in the streets of LA. Am I correct?

covedweller · Post by **covedweller** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:53 am

impulse wrote:.....So. A little while ago, the writers of this show introduced a new character named Gemma. Because of bad writing for this part, the character never was given a chance to fully develop and meet an audience, not even talking about a fan base. Therefore, like any respectful entertainment company, LG15 corp. sacrificed the young doe-eyed actress who was given the part for the benefits of blood-thirsty PMs of a violent ARG which educational purpose aims at the proper use of sniper rifles in the streets of LA. Am I correct?

Whoa, take a xanax and stop being so cynical!

liebrarian · Post by **liebrarian** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:56 am

so i checked out gemmers19 favourites and they are all lonelygirl15 videos except for a SergeLipski video about an airplane crash.... Flight SL1912 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmblKB6-YBc
Could this Lipski guy be a friend of the creators? is this just random or did someone fly between "exploring the motel" and "silent treatment"?
i have no idea.

breeislonely · Post by **breeislonely** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:11 pm

the ppl on youtube have no idea what's going on, someone thinks it's a commercial lol there's ppl there trying to tell them whats going on but they don't seem to read comments, only make them, it's very ammusing

impulse · Post by **impulse** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:28 pm

How can I be not cynical? Look, here's the only picture of Jackie, that poor girl who got fired last week from the show, there is on the LGpedia:

Now, what is the url of that picture? /lgpedia/images/8/87/JackieHeadshot.jpg
Did you notice the name of the picture? It says head shot! Now, you tell me there isn't a conspiracy!
Man, I'm so depressed, my life is gone, I hate myself....

covedweller · Post by **covedweller** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:06 pm

impulse wrote:How can I be not cynical? Look, here's the only picture of Jackie, that poor girl who got fired last week from the show, there is on the LGpedia:

Now, what is the url of that picture? /lgpedia/images/8/87/JackieHeadshot.jpg
Did you notice the name of the picture? It says head shot! Now, you tell me there isn't a conspiracy!
Man, I'm so depressed, my life is gone, I hate myself....

Jackie was fired?

generalization · Post by **generalization** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:10 pm

impulse wrote:How can I be not cynical? Look, here's the only picture of Jackie, that poor girl who got fired last week from the show, there is on the LGpedia:

Now, what is the url of that picture? /lgpedia/images/8/87/JackieHeadshot.jpg
Did you notice the name of the picture? It says head shot! Now, you tell me there isn't a conspiracy!
Man, I'm so depressed, my life is gone, I hate myself....

I am hoping this is sarcasm. If not, you do know that the pictures that actors turn in with their resumes and whatnot are called "Head Shots" right? I don't have any official head shots, but I do have several pictures that I use as head shots.

Beckers · Post by **Beckers** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:48 pm

is she really fired?

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:06 pm

HEADSHOT...does NOT mean she was SHOT in the head.

A photoSHOOT....doesn't mean that photo's were SHOT.

A headshot of someone is just a picture shot of their HEAD.

There is NO proof that Gemma is DEAD and there is NO PROOF that Jackie was fired.

impulse · Post by **impulse** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:26 pm

... i was just kidding kids.