0104 "Mystery Movies" [12/23/06]

Discuss the latest videos from Bree, Daniel, and others!

Moderator: Moderators

kalika
Casual Observer
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 12:08 am
Location: Michigan

Post by kalika »

I don't think she celebrates Christmas. Christmas itself is probably not on her mind, so I think it's asking a little much to expect her to remember to wish us all Happy Holidays. Remember how she went to that Equinox party/celebration with her dad?

I bet that means they celebrate the Winter Solstice as well -- which was on the 21st. So Bree's holidays are over and she's probably too busy NOT finding secret codes in dry cleaning messages to notice.
User avatar
betz28
The Order of Denderah
Posts: 4824
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: 'sippi
Contact:

Post by betz28 »

ok havent read the entire thread yet but yes all i thought of was nikki bower when she mentioned nancy drew...could she be canon? maybe? also good job on fiquring our CUSOON....you guys are so smart! anyway excellant video.
User avatar
betz28
The Order of Denderah
Posts: 4824
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: 'sippi
Contact:

Post by betz28 »

Blackburne wrote:Just commenting to say I'm one of the few who also likes Gemma. Really likes her! I hope they don't just write her out in the way that they have because in my opinion, I think that's just sloppy. I'm not all convinced that she's "bad" anyway - though if she is I wouldn't mind. Everybody loves a bad girl. :twisted:
i do not think she is going to be written out of the show. i think she'll make a big come back and have a major part of all of this...what is will be ...I do not know.
User avatar
kristenjane
Enthusiastic Fan
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:02 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by kristenjane »

This video doesnt have much to talk about once you figure out CUSOON...

Sad we only have 8 pages.
I am having a BABY boy.
He is due Sept. 14th
abcdefg
Casual Observer
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:11 am

Re: "it all fits together at the end"

Post by abcdefg »

SharpI wrote:The way Bree said, "secret codes, anything where it all sort of... fits together at the end" - do you think there's a deeper code in here than C U SOON?
i felt like the everything fitting together in the end line was more of a nod to us than anything else. i know there have been a lot of complaints about loose ends and random clues that have never been followed up on (the maps on lucy's computer anyone?) - so i kind of took that as a shout out that we should stick with it and despite our concerns it will all come together.
User avatar
robtomorrow
Devoted Fan
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by robtomorrow »

abcdefg wrote:
SharpI wrote:The way Bree said, "secret codes, anything where it all sort of... fits together at the end" - do you think there's a deeper code in here than C U SOON?
i felt like the everything fitting together in the end line was more of a nod to us than anything else. i know there have been a lot of complaints about loose ends and random clues that have never been followed up on (the maps on lucy's computer anyone?) - so i kind of took that as a shout out that we should stick with it and despite our concerns it will all come together.
I also thought that the mention of how things "fit together in the end" was a veiled reference to all the complaints about the loose ends in the story, it seems they are trying to tie some of the loose ends up, thus the recent video by Daniel revealing the drug that they were injecting Bree with. Although as others had pointed out it was rather clumsy, the logic involved in associating the drug Daniel found in the warehouse to the drug Bree was being injected with wasn't very sound, and there is still a loose end here because we still don't know why.
Lurker

Post by Lurker »

robtomorrow wrote:
abcdefg wrote:
SharpI wrote:The way Bree said, "secret codes, anything where it all sort of... fits together at the end" - do you think there's a deeper code in here than C U SOON?
i felt like the everything fitting together in the end line was more of a nod to us than anything else. i know there have been a lot of complaints about loose ends and random clues that have never been followed up on (the maps on lucy's computer anyone?) - so i kind of took that as a shout out that we should stick with it and despite our concerns it will all come together.
I also thought that the mention of how things "fit together in the end" was a veiled reference to all the complaints about the loose ends in the story, it seems they are trying to tie some of the loose ends up, thus the recent video by Daniel revealing the drug that they were injecting Bree with. Although as others had pointed out it was rather clumsy, the logic involved in associating the drug Daniel found in the warehouse to the drug Bree was being injected with wasn't very sound, and there is still a loose end here because we still don't know why.
I think the recent mention of Cassie was another attempt at working toward tying some things up. Sure, there's still some questions to be asked, but Miles promised us in the "On the Jumpking of Sharks..." thread that they'd begin working on resolving some stuff, but that it would take a little while. So far, though I know there's still plenty of questions, I'm feeling a lot better about the loose ends. It's apparent that they're working on keeping that promise.

These recent attempts (the mention of Cassie and the revelation of Epogen) along with Bree's line about things fitting together in the end give me confidence in them to come through.
User avatar
jobee13
Enthusiastic Fan
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:17 am

Post by jobee13 »

Eeekk has anyone here looked at the comments on Youtube?

To quote a few..

tomlinbr (13 hours ago)
Fascinating... like watching paint dry.

frannypoo (13 hours ago)
wow, that was two minutes i'll never get back.

n3rdrock (12 hours ago)
thank you for posting another completely fucking boring video!! what the f**k is wrong with the 'creators'? Can you see this shit fucking sucks now? ARGH!

WhiteBrightNeon (7 hours ago)
FAKE!!!

^^ Last ones kinda added in for humour coz I thought it was funny how they obviously hadn't done their homework :lol:

Anyway yeah, I have to say I don't check the vids on Youtube often (usually just view on main page) but is the viewer response always this negative? I'm not saying they were all negative (I did choose some of the worst examples) but I guess I'm just saying this because when I first started watching people seemed to love lonelygirl, and now it's like haters haters everywhere

Maybe it's just this video, but if people payed attention they'd see the "CUSOON" message, which is rather interesting..

Hmmm maybe I should begin a new topic for this if there isn't 1 already..
UpbeatMarshWiggle
Casual Observer
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:21 pm
Location: Michigan/USA

Post by UpbeatMarshWiggle »

jobee13 wrote:Eeekk has anyone here looked at the comments on Youtube?

. . .

Anyway yeah, I have to say I don't check the vids on Youtube often (usually just view on main page) but is the viewer response always this negative? I'm not saying they were all negative (I did choose some of the worst examples) but I guess I'm just saying this because when I first started watching people seemed to love lonelygirl, and now it's like haters haters everywhere
Youtube comments have been overwhelmingly brutal ever since Bree "came out" :) as being produced vs. being an amateur video blog. The videos still get tons of views on youtube, but the fan interaction is pretty much worthless, IMHO.

UMW
User avatar
robtomorrow
Devoted Fan
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by robtomorrow »

jobee13


You have quoted some of the more tame comments on YouTube, there are others that are so repulsive you wonder how they let these people loose on the streets, you would think they belong in a mental institution where they wouldn't be a threat to society. Of course maybe some of them are, do they let mental pacients have access to the internet?

At this point I would support the decision to take LG15 off of YouTube, it seems that the only ones still watching it there are the haters, and it would force the few LG15 fans left there to come to this website to watch the videos.
User avatar
alysaface
The Order of Denderah
Posts: 3030
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by alysaface »

=( it makes me sad. i hope the creators and the actors dont take that crap seriously.
RAWR!

http://youtube.com/profile?user=alysaface

stalk me.

You were so much cooler before you got your little PHD in everyone elses problems.
Lurker

Post by Lurker »

UpbeatMarshWiggle wrote:
jobee13 wrote:Eeekk has anyone here looked at the comments on Youtube?

. . .

Anyway yeah, I have to say I don't check the vids on Youtube often (usually just view on main page) but is the viewer response always this negative? I'm not saying they were all negative (I did choose some of the worst examples) but I guess I'm just saying this because when I first started watching people seemed to love lonelygirl, and now it's like haters haters everywhere
Youtube comments have been overwhelmingly brutal ever since Bree "came out" :) as being produced vs. being an amateur video blog. The videos still get tons of views on youtube, but the fan interaction is pretty much worthless, IMHO.

UMW
Which is the very reason that on Oct. 26 I got an account here.
robtomorrow wrote:At this point I would support the decision to take LG15 off of YouTube, it seems that the only ones still watching it there are the haters, and it would force the few LG15 fans left there to come to this website to watch the videos.
I don't think that would be a good idea -- though I do agree that a lot of the people who leave comments on YouTube (and not just on LG15 videos, but all videos) seem like incompassionate, inhumane sacks of shit. Though there's a lot of negativity on there, haters tend to be more vocal than people who actually like and appreciate things. For whatever reason, as a whole, we're wired to be more hesitant to tell someone we appreciate what they do than the soulless among us are to try spreading hurt and sadness.

Each LG15 video still gets tons of views on YouTube, and I'm sure that plenty of those people enjoy and appreciate the videos. To be honest, I dare say that the majority of the viewer base is on YT. Not the diehard fans, of course, but those vital casual viewers who make the difference with everything.
User avatar
robtomorrow
Devoted Fan
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by robtomorrow »

Lurker

I understand your argument, but I still think LG15 has outgrown YouTube, the majority of LG15 fans who still watch it on YouTube are at least aware of this website and would know where to go if they want to continue following the saga, also the viewers of the videos on YouTube don't contribute anything in regards to revenue or input.

But before they can do that, as we have discussed before, they need to make the OpAphid/Tachyon videos easier to find on this website so WE don't need to rely on YouTube to follow the story. The Creators said in chat that they ore working on that.
Lurker

Post by Lurker »

robtomorrow wrote:But before they can do that, as we have discussed before, they need to make the OpAphid/Tachyon videos easier to find on this website so WE don't need to rely on YouTube to follow the story. The Creators said in chat that they ore working on that.
Thanks for bringing that up. I never go in the chat, so I missed that. Glad to hear it. It's high time Tach/Op was featured in plain sight (or at least plainer sight).
User avatar
LONGTIMELURKER
Enthusiastic Fan
Posts: 386
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! ;) It's a secret.

Post by LONGTIMELURKER »

I hardly ever go to Youtube for LG15 anymore,I always watch it on here... I also get an e-mail when there is a new video which is cool! :)
The difference between Bree and Sarah is this ....

Bree- Classicly Beautiful/sweet/ "pure"/Vogue

Sarah-Modern Day HOT/ naughty/"dirty"/Penthouse
Post Reply