Talk:Breeniversisms: Difference between revisions
Modelmotion (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think it is the other way around, the absent commenter is gone for days to everyone else, but when they check their own watch upon returning, only 8 minutes have passed.~ [[User:QtheC|QtheC]] 23:47, 6 June 2007 (CDT) | I think it is the other way around, the absent commenter is gone for days to everyone else, but when they check their own watch upon returning, only 8 minutes have passed.~ [[User:QtheC|QtheC]] 23:47, 6 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
---- | |||
I agree that Q has the correct interpretation of the 8 minutes. According to the myth Joe was experimenting with a universal time zone but something went wrong. I believe that he thinks he estimated the location of the 436 and that caused the experiment to go wrong.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 01:06, 7 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 06:06, 7 June 2007
8 minutes
8 minutes is not cemented yet......but its a possible candidate: see LG15 today for articles on 8 minutes - it could also fit under 436--modelmotion 13:15, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
>WEll... the 436 actually occurs in 8 minutes to everyone else, but to the attacked it can be days...
I think it is the other way around, the absent commenter is gone for days to everyone else, but when they check their own watch upon returning, only 8 minutes have passed.~ QtheC 23:47, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
I agree that Q has the correct interpretation of the 8 minutes. According to the myth Joe was experimenting with a universal time zone but something went wrong. I believe that he thinks he estimated the location of the 436 and that caused the experiment to go wrong.--modelmotion 01:06, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
Breeniversisms
The word Breeniversisms does not exactly roll off the tongue. Perhaps Breenivism or Breenirism should be considered as alternatives.--modelmotion 18:12, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
