Talk:Crime Report: Difference between revisions
From LGPedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Talk about rename and possible fan crime page |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What do you guys think about this redirect?? We can have another Crime Report page for Fanfiction. I'd like to keep them separate to help avoid confusion. I can think of quite a few crimes that have occurred in Fan Vids right off the top of my head. --[[User:LordGreystoke422|LordGreystoke422]] 13:25, 2 February 2007 (CST) | What do you guys think about this redirect?? We can have another Crime Report page for Fanfiction. I'd like to keep them separate to help avoid confusion. I can think of quite a few crimes that have occurred in Fan Vids right off the top of my head. --[[User:LordGreystoke422|LordGreystoke422]] 13:25, 2 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:I don't see the point in the redirect. I think we should stick with [[Crime Report]] for canon characters, and [[Crime Report/spinoffs]] or something like that for the spin-offs. The first sentence of the article makes it clear that the article is about canon content. And we should be consistent throughout the wiki -- it wouldn't make sense to have "water theme:canon characters" and "water theme:non-canon characters." Having pages be about canon content is sort of our default, IMO.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 14:22, 2 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 20:22, 2 February 2007
What do you guys think about this redirect?? We can have another Crime Report page for Fanfiction. I'd like to keep them separate to help avoid confusion. I can think of quite a few crimes that have occurred in Fan Vids right off the top of my head. --LordGreystoke422 13:25, 2 February 2007 (CST)
- I don't see the point in the redirect. I think we should stick with Crime Report for canon characters, and Crime Report/spinoffs or something like that for the spin-offs. The first sentence of the article makes it clear that the article is about canon content. And we should be consistent throughout the wiki -- it wouldn't make sense to have "water theme:canon characters" and "water theme:non-canon characters." Having pages be about canon content is sort of our default, IMO.--JayHenry 14:22, 2 February 2007 (CST)
