Tangled Web - Revision history

Shiori at 03:07, 18 February 2009

2009-02-18T03:07:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:07, 18 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Blog		{{Blog
	\| name = {{PAGENAME}}		\| name = {{PAGENAME}}
			\| series = LG15
	\| number = 435		\| number = 435
	\| image = 0435_JennieSmart.jpg		\| image = 0435_JennieSmart.jpg

Zoey at 05:06, 28 June 2008

2008-06-28T05:06:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 28 June 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	<!-- Leave production credits		<!-- Leave production credits
	blank if there is no information. Do not specify "none". -->		blank if there is no information. Do not specify "none". -->
	\| execprod = Miles Beckett and ~~Greg~~ Goodfried		\| execprod = Miles Beckett, Greg Goodfried, and Amanda Goodfried
	\| serprod = Amanda Goodfried		\| serprod = Amanda Goodfried
	\| pa = Jenni Powell		\| pa = Jenni Powell

LGBot: EpHeader now in Blog

2008-04-16T06:45:08Z

EpHeader now in Blog

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:45, 16 April 2008
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\| PreviousB = She's Ready		\| PreviousB = She's Ready
	\| NextB = It's The Doing That Matters		\| NextB = It's The Doing That Matters
	}}		}}
	~~{{EpHeader\|435}}~~

	==Transcript==		==Transcript==
	(''Jonas is in his room, drawing on the whiteboard. A montage is shown of him trying to figure out ways to get to Carl by writing people and places on the board. He plays with a slinky. Cut to Jennie lying on his bed''.)		(''Jonas is in his room, drawing on the whiteboard. A montage is shown of him trying to figure out ways to get to Carl by writing people and places on the board. He plays with a slinky. Cut to Jennie lying on his bed''.)

Zoey at 07:44, 23 March 2008

2008-03-23T07:44:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 23 March 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\| pa = Jenni Powell		\| pa = Jenni Powell
	\| directors = Marcello Daciano		\| directors = Marcello Daciano
	\| story =		\| story = Tom Pettit and Blair Singer
	\| vidplay =		\| vidplay = Blair Singer
	\| camera = Kevin Schlanser		\| camera = Kevin Schlanser
	\| editor = Matt Vanselow		\| editor = Matt Vanselow

Shiori: /* Notes */

2008-03-18T18:42:15Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 18 March 2008
Line 111:		Line 111:

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	*Jennie's presents a radical [[feminist themes\|feminist]] claim, that females are not only equal but better than their male counter parts in inductive reasoning.		*Jennie presents a radical [[feminist themes\|feminist]] claim, that females are not only equal to, but better than, their male counter parts in inductive reasoning.
	*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.		*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.

Platypusrex256: /* Notes */

2008-03-18T18:29:08Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 18 March 2008
Line 111:		Line 111:

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	*Jennie's presents a radical [[feminist themes\|feminist]] claim, that females are not only equal but better than their male counter parts.		*Jennie's presents a radical [[feminist themes\|feminist]] claim, that females are not only equal but better than their male counter parts in inductive reasoning.
	*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.		*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.

Platypusrex256: /* Notes */ nobody suggested the HoO was a feminist group. did they?

2008-03-18T18:28:20Z

Notes: nobody suggested the HoO was a feminist group. did they?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 18 March 2008
Line 111:		Line 111:

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	*Jennie's ~~inductive reasoning bit is~~ a [[feminist themes\|feminist]] ~~statement. The notion that "feminism is a HoO trait", however~~, ~~is a fatuous one: the HoO is a front for an organization~~ that ~~kills young girls to preserve the lives of old men, hardly a promotion of~~ male~~-female equality~~.		*Jennie's presents a radical [[feminist themes\|feminist]] claim, that females are not only equal but better than their male counter parts.
	*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.		*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.

Zoey at 06:56, 18 March 2008

2008-03-18T06:56:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 18 March 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	<!-- Leave production credits		<!-- Leave production credits
	blank if there is no information. Do not specify "none". -->		blank if there is no information. Do not specify "none". -->
	\| execprod =		\| execprod = Miles Beckett and Greg Goodfried
	\| serprod =		\| serprod = Amanda Goodfried
	\| directors =		\| pa = Jenni Powell
			\| directors = Marcello Daciano
	\| story =		\| story =
	\| vidplay =		\| vidplay =
	\| camera =		\| camera = Kevin Schlanser
	\| editor =		\| editor = Matt Vanselow
	\| music supervisor =		\| music supervisor = Seth Jacobs
	\| song = "Cheekbone Hallows" by The Childballads		\| song = "Cheekbone Hallows" by The Childballads
	\| cast =		\| cast =

TimiN at 01:58, 18 March 2008

2008-03-18T01:58:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 18 March 2008
Line 32:		Line 32:
	\| Next = Spanish Princess		\| Next = Spanish Princess
	\| PreviousB = She's Ready		\| PreviousB = She's Ready
	\| NextB =		\| NextB = It's The Doing That Matters
	}}		}}
	{{EpHeader\|435}}		{{EpHeader\|435}}

76.0.138.207: /* Notes */

2008-03-15T03:55:28Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 15 March 2008
Line 110:		Line 110:

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	*Jennie's inductive reasoning bit is a [[feminist themes\|feminist]] statement. ~~Note~~ that feminism is a HoO trait.		*Jennie's inductive reasoning bit is a [[feminist themes\|feminist]] statement. The notion that "feminism is a HoO trait", however, is a fatuous one: the HoO is a front for an organization that kills young girls to preserve the lives of old men, hardly a promotion of male-female equality.
	*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.		*Jennie's pseudo-philosophical sophistry is neither inductive, nor is it deductive. Her theory that they ought to probe/examine/rely on the person most closely tied to Carl, is a type of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability appeal to probability], which is a logical fallacy. Her argument may also fall under the category of an {{wikipedia\|Association_fallacy\|association fallacy}}, which is roughly related to the {{wikipedia\|List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies\|red herring style fallacy}}.