Talk:Watcher 1 - Revision history

LordGreystoke422 at 05:54, 12 February 2007

2007-02-12T05:54:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:54, 12 February 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	It doesn't make sense to me. I see no reason to believe that these guys are Watchers or Deacons. They look like bodyguards or something to me. Classifying them as Watchers or as Deacons seems like an unwarranted assumption to me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:48, 11 February 2007 (CST)		It doesn't make sense to me. I see no reason to believe that these guys are Watchers or Deacons. They look like bodyguards or something to me. Classifying them as Watchers or as Deacons seems like an unwarranted assumption to me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:48, 11 February 2007 (CST)

			:::Well...what else do we call them in the credits for the credits on the video page? Thug 1, Thug 2, Thug 3? Man 1, Man 2, Man 3? I definitely think they should be merged whatever they are..WAIT!!! I GOT IT...the 3 little pig...no wait..ooooohh ohhhhh MR KOTTER!! The Three Stooges...hah..Oh man..wait..I am so serious about that..maybe we should change it to Stooge 1,2, and 3..I think the "Boys" will either get a kick out of it..or...correct the production credits for us..mwahahahaha..Damn I am evil..well not really..just mischievious..--[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 23:54, 11 February 2007 (CST)

JayHenry at 05:48, 12 February 2007

2007-02-12T05:48:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:48, 12 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::ahh, makes sense. I added a section and an image to the [[Watcher]] article. I think it covers everything mentioned in the articles for Watchers 1, 2 and 3. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:43, 11 February 2007 (CST)		::ahh, makes sense. I added a section and an image to the [[Watcher]] article. I think it covers everything mentioned in the articles for Watchers 1, 2 and 3. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:43, 11 February 2007 (CST)

			It doesn't make sense to me. I see no reason to believe that these guys are Watchers or Deacons. They look like bodyguards or something to me. Classifying them as Watchers or as Deacons seems like an unwarranted assumption to me.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 23:48, 11 February 2007 (CST)

OwenIsCool at 01:43, 12 February 2007

2007-02-12T01:43:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 12 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:At this point I think these names stem from not having anything else to call the 3 guys flanking Lucy and Daniel. I say watcher is fine at this point cause Deacons are more than likely Watchers..but not all Watchers are Deacons. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 18:21, 11 February 2007 (CST)		:At this point I think these names stem from not having anything else to call the 3 guys flanking Lucy and Daniel. I say watcher is fine at this point cause Deacons are more than likely Watchers..but not all Watchers are Deacons. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 18:21, 11 February 2007 (CST)

			::ahh, makes sense. I added a section and an image to the [[Watcher]] article. I think it covers everything mentioned in the articles for Watchers 1, 2 and 3. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:43, 11 February 2007 (CST)

LordGreystoke422 at 00:21, 12 February 2007

2007-02-12T00:21:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 12 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'm actually not sure whether to merge this into [[Watcher]] or [[The Deacons]]. Who's to say these three guys are not Deacons? Baldy McCreepy wore a suit and shades just like watchers do. Thoughts?		I'm actually not sure whether to merge this into [[Watcher]] or [[The Deacons]]. Who's to say these three guys are not Deacons? Baldy McCreepy wore a suit and shades just like watchers do. Thoughts?
	[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:06, 11 February 2007 (CST)		[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:06, 11 February 2007 (CST)


			:At this point I think these names stem from not having anything else to call the 3 guys flanking Lucy and Daniel. I say watcher is fine at this point cause Deacons are more than likely Watchers..but not all Watchers are Deacons. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 18:21, 11 February 2007 (CST)

OwenIsCool: merge to watcher or deacons?

2007-02-12T00:06:23Z

merge to watcher or deacons?

New page

==Merge==
I'm actually not sure whether to merge this into [[Watcher]] or [[The Deacons]]. Who's to say these three guys are not Deacons? Baldy McCreepy wore a suit and shades just like watchers do. Thoughts?
[[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 18:06, 11 February 2007 (CST)