Talk:Stock Options - Revision history

Milowent: /* platy doesn't like this note */

2008-03-24T20:43:25Z

platy doesn't like this note

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 24 March 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:*and it is poor practice to being a sentance with a conjunction ;-p		:*and it is poor practice to being a sentance with a conjunction ;-p
	::I'm with you, man. If you can make the sentence any shorter/concise/etc., please do. It's so crazy I'm not even going to touch it. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 19:07, 22 March 2008 (CDT)		::I'm with you, man. If you can make the sentence any shorter/concise/etc., please do. It's so crazy I'm not even going to touch it. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 19:07, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
			:::The note has been updated and shortened, and based on a comment JenniPowell made on lg15today (that Carl actually said "Verdus stock" instead of "Verdus stuff," i'm apt to leave in its current state. ("When Carl talks about proxy notices, it is implied that Carl is a current shareholder of Verdus.") --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 15:43, 24 March 2008 (CDT)

	== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==		== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==

Shiori at 00:07, 23 March 2008

2008-03-23T00:07:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 23 March 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:*suggestion: a more thorough explanation of how this stock opions / shareholders / proxy voting works could be helpful as a seperate page.		:*suggestion: a more thorough explanation of how this stock opions / shareholders / proxy voting works could be helpful as a seperate page.
	:*and it is poor practice to being a sentance with a conjunction ;-p		:*and it is poor practice to being a sentance with a conjunction ;-p
			::I'm with you, man. If you can make the sentence any shorter/concise/etc., please do. It's so crazy I'm not even going to touch it. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 19:07, 22 March 2008 (CDT)

	== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==		== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==
Line 12:		Line 13:
	::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22		::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22
	:I'm unsure, but if this note were to ever be significant, the best chance it would have if it notes how long it's been since we've seen the collage (not necessarily "a picture of Bree"), which though I'm not sure, may be as long ''as'' Opening the Box. --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 16:53, 22 March 2008 (CDT)		:I'm unsure, but if this note were to ever be significant, the best chance it would have if it notes how long it's been since we've seen the collage (not necessarily "a picture of Bree"), which though I'm not sure, may be as long ''as'' Opening the Box. --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 16:53, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
			::Or, you know, a note about when the last time we saw Bree was. (But that would be kind of redundant, since that's on her character page.) Either way, it seems kind of silly to include. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 19:07, 22 March 2008 (CDT)

Phoenician: /* i don't know whats wrong with this note */ darn sig

2008-03-22T21:53:03Z

i don't know whats wrong with this note: darn sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 22 March 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)		::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
	::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22		::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22
	:I'm unsure, but if this note were to ever be significant, the best chance it would have if it notes how long it's been since we've seen the collage (not necessarily "a picture of Bree"), which though I'm not sure, may be as long ''as'' Opening the Box.		:I'm unsure, but if this note were to ever be significant, the best chance it would have if it notes how long it's been since we've seen the collage (not necessarily "a picture of Bree"), which though I'm not sure, may be as long ''as'' Opening the Box. --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 16:53, 22 March 2008 (CDT)

Phoenician: /* i don't know whats wrong with this note */

2008-03-22T21:52:47Z

i don't know whats wrong with this note

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 22 March 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)		::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
	::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22		::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22
			:I'm unsure, but if this note were to ever be significant, the best chance it would have if it notes how long it's been since we've seen the collage (not necessarily "a picture of Bree"), which though I'm not sure, may be as long ''as'' Opening the Box.

Platypusrex256: /* i don't know whats wrong with this note */

2008-03-22T21:24:08Z

i don't know whats wrong with this note

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 22 March 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22		*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22
	::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)		::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
			::that is true. it is perhaps insignificant that picture is there anyway. if you look back in the history, someone speculated that jessica rose had renewed her contract based off the presence of the picture. that is a bit of a stretch but the snapshot was interesting none the less... how long has it been since her image has been included in a video? - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22

Phoenician at 20:32, 22 March 2008

2008-03-22T20:32:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 22 March 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==		== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==
	*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22		*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22
			::Because it's already mentioned in the transcript. If you want, we can link the word Collage back to [[Opening the Box]], but there's no point in being redundant, is there? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 15:32, 22 March 2008 (CDT)

Platypusrex256: /* platy doesn't like this note */

2008-03-22T16:27:17Z

platy doesn't like this note

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 22 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:

	== platy doesn't like this note ==		== platy doesn't like this note ==
	* Although Carl references getting proxy notices in connection with stock options he claims to have received from Verdus, a holder of stock options does not yet own actual stock, and would have no need to give a proxy. Proxies are given by a voting shareholder who cannot attend a shareholder meeting or otherwise participate in a shareholder vote, and authorizes a designee to vote the shares. Perhaps Carl has exercised his stock options and is now an actual shareholder of Verdus. However, that fact by itself would likely not be the source of his knowledge that the Board meets on the third Friday of every month. Shareholders do not participate or vote at meetings of a Board of Directors.		* Although Carl references getting proxy notices in connection with stock options he claims to have received from Verdus, a holder of stock options does not yet own actual stock, and would have no need to give a proxy. Proxies are given by a voting shareholder who cannot attend a shareholder meeting or otherwise participate in a shareholder vote, and authorizes a designee to vote the shares. Perhaps Carl has exercised his stock options and is now an actual shareholder of Verdus. However, that fact by itself would likely not be the source of his knowledge that the Board meets on the third Friday of every month. Shareholders do not participate or vote at meetings of a Board of Directors.
Line 6:		Line 5:
	:*note could be reduced to observation, that carl has received options and implies that he is currently a shareholder		:*note could be reduced to observation, that carl has received options and implies that he is currently a shareholder
	:*suggestion: a more thorough explanation of how this stock opions / shareholders / proxy voting works could be helpful as a seperate page.		:*suggestion: a more thorough explanation of how this stock opions / shareholders / proxy voting works could be helpful as a seperate page.
			:*and it is poor practice to being a sentance with a conjunction ;-p

	== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==		== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==
	*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22		*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platy]] mar 22

Platypusrex256: word

2008-03-22T16:23:55Z

word

New page

== platy doesn't like this note ==
* Although Carl references getting proxy notices in connection with stock options he claims to have received from Verdus, a holder of stock options does not yet own actual stock, and would have no need to give a proxy. Proxies are given by a voting shareholder who cannot attend a shareholder meeting or otherwise participate in a shareholder vote, and authorizes a designee to vote the shares. Perhaps Carl has exercised his stock options and is now an actual shareholder of Verdus. However, that fact by itself would likely not be the source of his knowledge that the Board meets on the third Friday of every month. Shareholders do not participate or vote at meetings of a Board of Directors.
:*the language is more complicated than needed
:*carl does not say anything about a ''board of directors'' only a ''board'' which could mean nothing more than the board of shareholders. if this is incorrect language, it is an under stable mistake from someone who isn't business savvy.
:*note could be reduced to observation, that carl has received options and implies that he is currently a shareholder
:*suggestion: a more thorough explanation of how this stock opions / shareholders / proxy voting works could be helpful as a seperate page.

== i don't know whats wrong with this note ==
*A picture of [[Bree]] is visible in this video. - [[user:platypusrex256|platy]] mar 22