LGPedia - User contributions [en]

Category talk:Videos with Sarah

2008-03-07T06:45:43Z

70.134.119.153: New page: What's the difference between the "Videos with Sarah" page and the "Alexandra Dreyfus filmography" page? Same goes for the rest of the characters.

What's the difference between the "Videos with Sarah" page and the "Alexandra Dreyfus filmography" page? Same goes for the rest of the characters.

What Have I Done?

2008-03-07T06:41:42Z

70.134.119.153:

{{Blog
| name = {{PAGENAME}}
| number = 432
| image = 432-Gina thoughtful.jpg
| caption = Homewrecker
| blogger = Gina
| date = {{date|2008|March|6}}
| url = {{lg15|538}}
| forumid = 16474
| length = 1:54
| description = I feel like this is all my fault.
| location = [[The rented house]]
| tags = {{tags|lonelygirl15|lg15|hymn of one|Gina|What|Have|Done?}}


| execprod =
| coexecprod =
| assocprod =
| serprod =
| producers =
| assistprod =
| lineprod =
| supprod =
| directors =
| camera =
| vidplay =
| headwriter =
| story =
| editor =
| pm =
| pc =
| pa =
| pr =
| ic =
| animation =
| prodserv =
| music supervisor =
| song =
| cast =
{{VidChar|Daniel}}
{{VidChar|Sarah}}
{{VidChar|Gina}}
{{VidChar|Jonas}}
{{VidChar|Jennie}}

| Previous = Prey
| Next =
| PreviousB = Drawing in Bed
| NextB =
}}
{{EpHeader|432}}

==Transcript==
(''Gina is in the living room with the camera on her lap, and Sarah is sitting on a chair across the room''.)

'''Daniel:''' Sarah, all you do is put us at risk.

'''Sarah:''' How can you say that to me? You know, you really know how to make me feel like crap.

'''Daniel:''' Come on! You walked back from [[Prey|the store]] when you ''knew'' the [[Shadow]] was tracking us.

'''Sarah:''' Daniel, I didn't do a-

'''Daniel:''' Didn't you think you might be leading him to our doorstep? Huh?

'''Sarah:''' I'm sorry, okay? I was just trying to help. I- I guess I wasn't thinking.

'''Daniel:''' Think, Sarah.

'''Sarah:''' Don't worry. (''Leans in to try and kiss Daniel''.) There'll be plenty of time for thinking (''Daniel moves away''.) when it's just you and me.

'''Gina:''' Wow. So out of here.

(''Gina walks to Daniel and Jonas's bedroom, where Jennie and Jonas are packing''.)

'''Jennie:''' Yeah, but (inaudible).

'''Jonas:''' Well, if there's any [[Lullaby Project]], then I think- Hey, Gina. Then think that's our first lead to find [[Bree's parents#Mother|Bree's mom]], you know?

'''Jennie:''' Yeah, well, the [[Hymn of One]] could set up a Lullaby Project in a matter of days, but they could be anywhere.

'''Jonas:''' Yeah. [[Carl]]'s still our best lead. He's still heavily into the Hymn of One, you know?

'''Jennie:''' Yeah. He was a real true believer.

'''Jonas:''' (''Looks at Gina''.) Um...

'''Jennie:''' Can you pass me that scarf?

'''Jonas:''' Uh, yeah.

(''Jonas grabs a scarf from a box nearby and hands it to Jennie''.)

'''Jennie:''' Thank you.

'''Jonas:''' Hey, Gina, I need to talk to you. I'm gonna be honest: we're not sure how involved Bree's mom was with the Hymn of One. You know?

'''Jennie:''' Do you mean she could have actually been ''in'' [[the Order]]?

'''Jonas:''' It's possible. Anything's possible; the thing is that we don't know for sure. Alright? But we're gonna find Bree's mom. For you. Okay? 'Cause that's what you asked us to do. Alright... Oh, uh, and I think you should say goodbye to Sarah and Daniel tonight because we're getting an early start tomorrow morning. I'm gonna get something to eat.

'''Jennie:''' Okay.

(''Gina turns the camera on herself after Jennie and Jonas have gone''.)

'''Gina:''' We're splitting up. I'm splitting everybody up.

==Notes==

Her Alibi

2008-03-01T22:47:27Z

70.134.119.153: /* Notes */

{{Blog
| name = {{PAGENAME}}
| number = 193
| image =
| caption =
| blogger = Lee
| date = March 1st, 2008
| url = {{KM|238}}
| forumid = 599
| length = 5:22
| description = I don't know what this lot are involved in but I don't like it one bit. Justin said I was gonna be a presenter, not an adventurer!
| location = [[JTV road trip locations#Edinburgh|Edinburgh]]
| tags = {{tags|}}


| execprod =
| coexecprod =
| assocprod =
| serprod =
| producers =
| assistprod =
| lineprod =
| supprod =
| directors =
| camera =
| vidplay =
| headwriter =
| story =
| editor =
| pm =
| pc =
| pa =
| pr =
| ic =
| animation =
| prodserv =
| music supervisor =
| song =

| cast =
{{VidChar|Julia}}
{{VidChar|Gavin}}
{{VidChar|Lee}}
{{VidChar|Charlie}}
{{VidChar|Michelle Clore|Valerie Cutko}}
{{VidChar|Shadow|KM Cameos#Mike GLC{{!}}Mike GLC}}

| Previous = Touch the Toyota
| Next =
| PreviousB = One More Chance
| NextB =

| KM = yes
}}
{{EpHeader|KM=yes|193}}

==Transcript==
{{transcript incomplete}}

==Notes==
This video confirms that Michelle Clore was responsible for Gavin being let out of prison.

This Video also confirms that Michelle Clore was not responsible for Kate's death.

This video suggests that Steve was responsible for Kate's death

This is Lee's first video since the software was lost.

Talk:Theories About Characters

2008-02-24T02:13:36Z

70.134.119.153: /* Julia=Mallory */

==Theories?==
I really like a page for character theories, but I get the feeling some of the "theories" here are just fan speculation. Any thoughts? --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 17:58, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
:Yes, a lot of the theories have no proof. Like the one that said Charlie might have had an abortion - why? Perhaps the page could be set up a similar way the "theories page" on the Heroes Wiki is? (http://heroeswiki.com/Theories:People) where people say their theory, citations from videos, and notes?[[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 22:03, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
::I made the theories page and my idea was to make it just like the heroeswiki but i don't know how. --jonas'brother

== Clean Up? ==

I don't know if this matters, and I don't know how to do it... but shouldn't we remove the speculation about characters leaving the messages in the bree blogs, since we know who it is now? And also, it's not really a theory anymore that Alex was the woman in the deep throat video...

I agree... we also know that it's unlikely Kate was a Ceremony girl, since we saw what happens in ceremonies. --Greenie
:As a matter of fact, Greenie, it's impossible that Kate was a Ceremony girl, let alone Charlie. [[User:SilverBULLETx3|  '''•Silver•'''  ]] [[User talk:SilverBULLETx3|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SilverBULLETx3|Contribs]] 23:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT)

agreed again. we should seperate the open theories from the theories that have been closed through confirmation or denied. - [[user:platypusrex256|platy]] sep 23

== Disproven Theories? ==

If a theory is disproven, should it be removed from the list?[[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 22:03, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
:If a theory is disproven, just but "disproven" next to it in parathesis (i spelled that wrong lol) --jonas'brother
::and why does it say that the theory that jonas and bree have the same parents is disproven? when was it disproven? --jonas'brother

== Theories about spin-off characters? ==

Perhaps a page could be made for people to post their theories on fanfic/ARG characters? I think it'd be interesting to see what people had to say. [[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 22:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

==What exactly is this page for?==

I've got a theory, but I id thid page just for anyone with an idea, or does the theory have to have public opion behind it?

==reasons==
Some of these theories are either really stupid (like the idea that [[Kate]] is really [[Cassie]] - what, so Kate went to high school with [[Daniel]] and [[Bree]] and was in California last year to stalk them?) or are sort of interesting but lack proof (like the theory that [[Charlie]] was once pregnant and lost her baby). In all cases, though, I would really appreciate some explanation of the theory, so that we can research, discuss, prove, or disprove the theories. What do you think? --[[User:Katiej88|Katiej88]] 22:17, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
==Michelle Clore's Body Guards==
I'm not quite as "with it" when it comes to the KM series, but when was it proven that her body guards were watchers? Wouldn't it make more sense that they are [[Shadow]]s if Michelle is an Elder?? -[[user:Nancypants|Nancypants]]
:I ''think'' that what was taken as confirmation that her bodyguards were Watchers came from a comment that Greg Goodfried left somewhere that he had played a Watcher in the video at the Second Space Gallery. Ooo, I found it! [http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2754228927937283278&postID=219197362622375722] My question is how has it been ''proven'' that Michelle Clore is an Elder and in the Order? All we have of evidence for this is that Dudley and Dr. Griffin said so (and that she's put HoO symbols in her pictures, and that she's got Watchers...) - but still I wouldn't call that incontrovertible proof just yet ... what do y'all think? -[[User:Theresa|Theresa]] 11:15, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
::Arg, I don't know. I'm pretty sure she's supposed to be an Elder. I'm mad that they have watchers being her bodyguards though. I thought Watchers were supposed to be WATCHING the trait positive girls. Not hanging around old ladies. [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]]
:::I put a ? after "Proven" that they were Watchers. I mean, we don't know that for sure. I also removed proven from "Elder" and "Order" - just because Dudley says so doesn't mean it's fact. ;-p -[[User:Theresa|Theresa]] 11:03, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
::::Michelle Clore's bodyguards were definitely Watchers (see the above post by Nancypants). However, I agree, we have no "official confirmation" that Michelle is an [[Elder]]. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 11:42, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::Well, it was me that wrote that Greg had said "Watcher" on that comment at lg15today, but got confused after [[The Gallery - 6pm 22nd September 2007|the video credits]] got changed back from Watcher to Bodyguard and the names withheld. But if Zoey says definitely, then it is definitely a definitely! -[[User:Theresa|Theresa]] 11:49, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
::::::I agree, if Zoey says so, that's good enough for me. [[user:Nancypants|Nancypants]]
:::::::Ahaha, shoot, I sure hope I'm right then... *hides* LOL. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 20:03, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
==Wrong Grammar==
Is "Disproven" and "Proven" or "Disproved" and "Proved". I'm pretty sure its the first two.

==Proven?==

How is "Mallory is having some sort of relationship with Mr. Banks/Professor DelMundo." and "Tariq's date will have some connection to HoO/The Order" proven?? [[User:Bree is awesome|Bree is awesome]] 00:33, 20 November 2007 (CST)

==Categorization==
I've been contemplating this page for a while, with its mish-mash of information, and I've come up with an idea. How about we literally separate the theories or color-code them or something (like this):
* Current theories that have not been proven/disproven
* More theories
* Etc.
<table width="75%"><tr><td width="50%">'''Proven'''
*Theory 1 (Reasoning)
</td><td width="50%">'''Disproven'''
*Theory 1 (Reasoning)
</td><tr></table>
I'm going to reformat the page, feel free to discuss and let me know of any criticisms. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 10:57, 3 December 2007 (CST)
::Just want to say that this new format is fantastic! [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 19:48, 3 December 2007 (CST)
===Take 2===
'Kay, there's a new categorization added, since this page was getting confusing. I sorted each series into "Notable Characters" and "Minor Characters", each in alphabetical order. To minimize fighting over who should be where, as there always is on the characters page, here's how these should break down:
*'''Notable Characters:''' Characters who are, or at one time were main or supporting characters PIVOTAL to the series, or just other important characters pivotal to the series. This means no Nikki B, but Spencer is necessary.
*'''Minor Characters:''' Characters who are just that: minor. Not pivotal to the series. Nikki B fits here, as well as Bree and Jonas's parent; others.

Feel free to add new categories, but this needed to be done. I, for one, was getting really confused as to some of the more minor characters we've only seen once were, and was getting very irritated looking it up. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 13:54, 12 February 2008 (CST)

== Proven? ==

Is it plausible that we use the fact that we ourselves moved people to the "former characters" list as proof that they will no longer be appearing? (ie:Spencer) Just wondering, I mean, unless the Creators sends our Admins a note that says ''"this person will NEVER be on the show again"'' how can we know? (At one point it was "proven" Taylor wouldn't be coming back because someone had moved her to the former characters list) [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 19:52, 3 December 2007 (CST)
:I was wondering that myself when I was reformatting the page. Honestly, I wouldn't think so. The entire "former characters" section was set up under the premise that the characters are ''likely'' to never be seen again, but it's not a fact. I'd say we should nix any "proven to not have any more appearances" characters until it's either confirmed by the Creators or the series is over. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 23:27, 3 December 2007 (CST)
::Yeah, I've been editing out the ones that say they are proven not to have any more appearances. Seems like you and I are the only ones who care about this so I'm glad we're in agreement! <3 [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 20:20, 11 December 2007 (CST)

== Julia=Mallory ==

I'm unclear as to how it Julia isn't a parallel character to Mallory? Is it because of Mallory's relationship with Del Mundo? Seems to sort superficial, don't you think? Especially seeing as how Daniel broke it off with Mallory just a little before Julia broke it off with Tariq. That actually made me wonder if Kate was parallel to Sarah (because of her time missing when she was with the Lullaby Project, too.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:70.134.119.153|70.134.119.153]] ([[User talk:70.134.119.153|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.134.119.153|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.
:It's moreso disproven because of the role Julia's been playing in KateModern. Mallory was never, EVER even close to a main character, whereas Julia is off by herself advancing the plot of the show and not with Tariq anymore. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 06:57, 19 February 2008 (CST)

== Sisters? ==

I don't see how it's disproven that Kate or Emma could be biologically related to Bree and Gina. Isn't there enough time between their ages that Kate could have been sold from the same mother before Gina was born or Emma was taken after Gina and Bree were taken?

Talk:Theories About Characters

2008-02-19T07:20:16Z

70.134.119.153: /* Proven? */

Talk:Theories About Characters

2008-02-19T07:19:48Z

70.134.119.153: /* Proven? */

==Theories?==
I really like a page for character theories, but I get the feeling some of the "theories" here are just fan speculation. Any thoughts? --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 17:58, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
:Yes, a lot of the theories have no proof. Like the one that said Charlie might have had an abortion - why? Perhaps the page could be set up a similar way the "theories page" on the Heroes Wiki is? (http://heroeswiki.com/Theories:People) where people say their theory, citations from videos, and notes?[[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 22:03, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
::I made the theories page and my idea was to make it just like the heroeswiki but i don't know how. --jonas'brother

== Clean Up? ==

I don't know if this matters, and I don't know how to do it... but shouldn't we remove the speculation about characters leaving the messages in the bree blogs, since we know who it is now? And also, it's not really a theory anymore that Alex was the woman in the deep throat video...

I agree... we also know that it's unlikely Kate was a Ceremony girl, since we saw what happens in ceremonies. --Greenie
:As a matter of fact, Greenie, it's impossible that Kate was a Ceremony girl, let alone Charlie. [[User:SilverBULLETx3|  '''•Silver•'''  ]] [[User talk:SilverBULLETx3|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SilverBULLETx3|Contribs]] 23:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT)

agreed again. we should seperate the open theories from the theories that have been closed through confirmation or denied. - [[user:platypusrex256|platy]] sep 23

== Disproven Theories? ==

If a theory is disproven, should it be removed from the list?[[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 22:03, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
:If a theory is disproven, just but "disproven" next to it in parathesis (i spelled that wrong lol) --jonas'brother
::and why does it say that the theory that jonas and bree have the same parents is disproven? when was it disproven? --jonas'brother

== Theories about spin-off characters? ==

Perhaps a page could be made for people to post their theories on fanfic/ARG characters? I think it'd be interesting to see what people had to say. [[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 22:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

==What exactly is this page for?==

I've got a theory, but I id thid page just for anyone with an idea, or does the theory have to have public opion behind it?

==reasons==
Some of these theories are either really stupid (like the idea that [[Kate]] is really [[Cassie]] - what, so Kate went to high school with [[Daniel]] and [[Bree]] and was in California last year to stalk them?) or are sort of interesting but lack proof (like the theory that [[Charlie]] was once pregnant and lost her baby). In all cases, though, I would really appreciate some explanation of the theory, so that we can research, discuss, prove, or disprove the theories. What do you think? --[[User:Katiej88|Katiej88]] 22:17, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
==Michelle Clore's Body Guards==
I'm not quite as "with it" when it comes to the KM series, but when was it proven that her body guards were watchers? Wouldn't it make more sense that they are [[Shadow]]s if Michelle is an Elder?? -[[user:Nancypants|Nancypants]]
:I ''think'' that what was taken as confirmation that her bodyguards were Watchers came from a comment that Greg Goodfried left somewhere that he had played a Watcher in the video at the Second Space Gallery. Ooo, I found it! [http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2754228927937283278&postID=219197362622375722] My question is how has it been ''proven'' that Michelle Clore is an Elder and in the Order? All we have of evidence for this is that Dudley and Dr. Griffin said so (and that she's put HoO symbols in her pictures, and that she's got Watchers...) - but still I wouldn't call that incontrovertible proof just yet ... what do y'all think? -[[User:Theresa|Theresa]] 11:15, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
::Arg, I don't know. I'm pretty sure she's supposed to be an Elder. I'm mad that they have watchers being her bodyguards though. I thought Watchers were supposed to be WATCHING the trait positive girls. Not hanging around old ladies. [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]]
:::I put a ? after "Proven" that they were Watchers. I mean, we don't know that for sure. I also removed proven from "Elder" and "Order" - just because Dudley says so doesn't mean it's fact. ;-p -[[User:Theresa|Theresa]] 11:03, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
::::Michelle Clore's bodyguards were definitely Watchers (see the above post by Nancypants). However, I agree, we have no "official confirmation" that Michelle is an [[Elder]]. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 11:42, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::Well, it was me that wrote that Greg had said "Watcher" on that comment at lg15today, but got confused after [[The Gallery - 6pm 22nd September 2007|the video credits]] got changed back from Watcher to Bodyguard and the names withheld. But if Zoey says definitely, then it is definitely a definitely! -[[User:Theresa|Theresa]] 11:49, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
::::::I agree, if Zoey says so, that's good enough for me. [[user:Nancypants|Nancypants]]
:::::::Ahaha, shoot, I sure hope I'm right then... *hides* LOL. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 20:03, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
==Wrong Grammar==
Is "Disproven" and "Proven" or "Disproved" and "Proved". I'm pretty sure its the first two.

==Proven?==

How is "Mallory is having some sort of relationship with Mr. Banks/Professor DelMundo." and "Tariq's date will have some connection to HoO/The Order" proven?? [[User:Bree is awesome|Bree is awesome]] 00:33, 20 November 2007 (CST)

==Categorization==
I've been contemplating this page for a while, with its mish-mash of information, and I've come up with an idea. How about we literally separate the theories or color-code them or something (like this):
* Current theories that have not been proven/disproven
* More theories
* Etc.
<table width="75%"><tr><td width="50%">'''Proven'''
*Theory 1 (Reasoning)
</td><td width="50%">'''Disproven'''
*Theory 1 (Reasoning)
</td><tr></table>
I'm going to reformat the page, feel free to discuss and let me know of any criticisms. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 10:57, 3 December 2007 (CST)
::Just want to say that this new format is fantastic! [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 19:48, 3 December 2007 (CST)
===Take 2===
'Kay, there's a new categorization added, since this page was getting confusing. I sorted each series into "Notable Characters" and "Minor Characters", each in alphabetical order. To minimize fighting over who should be where, as there always is on the characters page, here's how these should break down:
*'''Notable Characters:''' Characters who are, or at one time were main or supporting characters PIVOTAL to the series, or just other important characters pivotal to the series. This means no Nikki B, but Spencer is necessary.
*'''Minor Characters:''' Characters who are just that: minor. Not pivotal to the series. Nikki B fits here, as well as Bree and Jonas's parent; others.

Feel free to add new categories, but this needed to be done. I, for one, was getting really confused as to some of the more minor characters we've only seen once were, and was getting very irritated looking it up. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 13:54, 12 February 2008 (CST)

== Proven? ==

Is it plausible that we use the fact that we ourselves moved people to the "former characters" list as proof that they will no longer be appearing? (ie:Spencer) Just wondering, I mean, unless the Creators sends our Admins a note that says ''"this person will NEVER be on the show again"'' how can we know? (At one point it was "proven" Taylor wouldn't be coming back because someone had moved her to the former characters list) [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 19:52, 3 December 2007 (CST)
:I was wondering that myself when I was reformatting the page. Honestly, I wouldn't think so. The entire "former characters" section was set up under the premise that the characters are ''likely'' to never be seen again, but it's not a fact. I'd say we should nix any "proven to not have any more appearances" characters until it's either confirmed by the Creators or the series is over. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 23:27, 3 December 2007 (CST)
::Yeah, I've been editing out the ones that say they are proven not to have any more appearances. Seems like you and I are the only ones who care about this so I'm glad we're in agreement! <3 [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 20:20, 11 December 2007 (CST)

== Proven? ==

I'm unclear as to how it Julia isn't a parallel character to Mallory? Is it because of Mallory's relationship with Del Mundo? Seems to sort superficial, don't you think? Especially seeing as how Daniel broke it off with Mallory just a little before Julia broke it off with Tariq. That actually made me wonder if Kate was parallel to Sarah (because of her time missing when she was with the Lullaby Project, too.)

Beer Bath

2008-02-04T05:39:12Z

70.134.119.153: /* Notes */

{{Blog
| name = {{PAGENAME}}
| number = 401
| image = 0401-JonasBeerBath.jpg
| caption = Totally fucking clueless!
| blogger = Jonas
| date = January 18th, 2008
| url = {{lg15|486}}
| forumid = 15782
| length = 7:55
| description = I feel like an idiot.
| location =
| tags = {{tags|lonelygirl15|lg15|bree|jonaskto|danielbeast|emma|beer|drunk|idiot}}


| execprod =
| coexecprod =
| assocprod =
| serprod =
| producers =
| lineprod =
| supprod =
| directors =
| camera =
| vidplay =
| headwriter =
| story =
| editor =
| pm =
| ps =
| pa =
| pr =
| ipa =
| animation =
| prodserv =
| music supervisor =

| song =
| cast = {{VidChar|Jonas}}

| Previous = Girl Tied Up
| Next = Am I A Criminal?
| PreviousB = Cream or Sugar?
| NextB = Too Dangerous!
| NextC = You Were Right
}}
{{EpHeader|401}}

==Transcript==
'''Jonas:''' Oh man. (''sighs'') I saw [[Dr. Calvin Hart|Dr. Hart]]'s video last night. I saw Emma, and uh, then I went out and I got shit-faced. I don't remember the video that you're about to see, but, uh, you know, I think it pretty much says it all. And, um, well, [[Daniel]] and [[Sarah]], [[Jennie]] and I will see you guys tomorrow.

(''Cut to Jonas in the bathroom wearing only a pair of gray boxer briefs. There are around a dozen beer cans sitting on and by the bathtub.'')

'''Jonas:''' (''stumbling into frame holding a beer can'') Oh, hehe. (''points at the camera and stars singing'') ''The red light, the red light, Roxanne...'' (''sits in the bathtub'') Ow. (''takes a sip of beer'') Just what the doctor ordered. (''leans toward the camera knocking a beer can off the tub'') No, no, no, no. Want a job done? (''gets out of the tub knocking more beer cans down'') You gotta do it yourself. (''moves the camera closer to the tub and gets back in'') Rub-a-dub-dub. Okay. (''opens a beer can which foams all over him, then laughs and takes a sip'') Okay. (''sets the beer can down and picks another one up'') Welcome to everybody's favorite game: "How stupid is Jonas?" (''points at himself'') Me. Okay. (''takes a sip of beer'') So, okay, I just want to say to everybody, I want to introduce the contestants for today. And the contestants is everybody, (''points at the camera'') you. Everybody at home. (''waves'') Hi. So, let's just give a loud round of applause to all the contestants at home, everybody at their computers. (''claps and pretends to yell for a bit'') ''People at their computers, people at their computers. Shhh. Shhh. Okay. Shhh.'' Let's just get the game started. Let's just get the games started. Let's do the first question. (''sets his beer can down and picks up another one, taking a sip from it'') Okay, okay. When Jonas, (''points at himself'') me, was, uh, ambushed by Dr. Hart, and Dr. Hart knew his name and where he lived, Jonas was a) very suspicious, b) a little bit concerned, or c) totally fucking clueless! (''raises his arms'') Whoo! Aha! Now, think hard everybody, think hard. Your answer? (''puts his hand behind his hear as if listening for the viewer's answer'') That's right, that's right. Totally fucking clueless! (''pretends to yell again'') Shhh. Shhh. It's just the first question; it's always the easiest. Okay, we're moving to round two. We're moving to round two, (''opens another beer can'') where the questions get harder and the points double (''sips the beer as it foams over'') I wish it would stop doing that. Okay, (''sets the beer can down'') question number two. When Dr. Hart just so happened to have a videotape of himself arguing with [[Ted McKinley]] (''picks up a beer can'') about the Hart study, Jonas was a) very suspicious, b) a little concerned, or c) totally fucking clueless! (''raises his arms'') Woohoo! Haha! That's right, c, c for clueless! (''taps his head'') Clueless, woo! (''pretends to yell again'') Shhh. Shhh. We gotta go to the third round, people. (''opens another beer can and takes a sip'') Question number three: when Dr. Hart spent well over three hours at the [[Verdus Pharmaceuticals]] with me and my sister, and then he eluded (''counts with his fingers in a singsong voice'') one, two, three, four, five... five armed security guards, five armed security guards with a vial of apple juice, (''laughs'') of... Jonas was (''puts his head down over the side of the tub then lifts it back up'') clueless! Clueless. So, that's correct. I hope everybody was keeping score and we have our winners. Hey, okay, let's tell, hey, let's tell them what they've won, Bob. Let's tell them what they've won. Everybody, let's tell them what they've lost. I want to tell them what they've lost. (''begins crying and breathing heavily'') Their sister. (''takes a long drink of beer'') Alright, that's our game. (''puts his hand up as if turning off the camera with a remote control'') ''Boop.'' Oh yeah, one more thing. Daniel, I don't give a shit about [[Gina]] or Dr. Hart, or Verdus Pharmaceuticals. I just want my sister back. (''leans back in the tub'') I just want my sister back. (''puts his head down'')

==Notes==
*One of the tags on Youtube was misspelled as "jonaskto" when this video was uploaded.
*At 7 minutes 55 seconds in length, this is the longest ever lonelygirl15 video to date.
*Jonas is [[drinking]] Miller Genuine Draft beer. It has a volume of 4.7% alcohol.
*The song that Jonas is singing in the beginning of his drunken video is Roxanne by The Police.
*Upon original viewing, a handful of viewers claimed to have seen a [[Watcher]] tattoo on Jonas' leg. Upon further investigating, those reports are inconclusive.
* This video is somewhat like the David Hasslehoff drunk video. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sewJsKQDp4]
* This is the fourth time we've seen Jonas in a bath tub.

Beer Bath

2008-02-04T05:30:58Z

70.134.119.153: /* Notes */