<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://192.168.12.222/lgpedia/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=68.221.73.162</id>
	<title>LGPedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://192.168.12.222/lgpedia/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=68.221.73.162"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://192.168.12.222/lgpedia/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/68.221.73.162"/>
	<updated>2026-08-12T14:12:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://192.168.12.222/lgpedia/index.php?title=Richard_Rushfield&amp;diff=3306</id>
		<title>Richard Rushfield</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://192.168.12.222/lgpedia/index.php?title=Richard_Rushfield&amp;diff=3306"/>
		<updated>2006-10-12T00:33:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;68.221.73.162: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Richard Rushfield&#039;&#039;&#039; is an entertainment reporter at the LATimes who helped break the wall of silence and mystery surrounding [[Lonelygirl15]].  Already on the hunt to find out if Bree was real, Rushfield was approached on or about August 29, 2006 by a group of three LG15 sleuthers, occasionally referred to as the [[Phorum 3]].  The [[Phorum 3]] secretly tracked IP addresses of the LG15 creators, which eventually led to the Creative Artists Agency in Beverly Hills, California.  A few hours in advance of an LATimes article by Rushfield that was released on the evening of September 7, 2006, [[The Creators]] of the Lonelygirl15 project revealed on the Lonelygirl15.com forum that LG15 was not &amp;quot;real,&amp;quot; in a cryptic &amp;quot;Message From The Creators.&amp;quot;   That post and the traffic from the LATimes article crashed the Lonelygirl15.com site for a number of hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article could be cleaned up more, assuming you agree its worthwhile to have an article on richie rushfield.  I think he&#039;s deserving.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>68.221.73.162</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>