Page 1 of 3
"i've recorderd the message they wanted"
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:36 am
by cittiecait
ok is alex reffering to the message she recorded with daniel about jonas's parents still being alive or about this new message... i mena it could be a double/triple bluff (i've lost count of how many times the alex character has confusesed me about her loyalties)
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:59 am
by Sami
Yes, I think that's the message she's refering to
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:43 am
by silvermoon
I agree, that is the message she referred to.
I still don't trust Alex, though.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:33 am
by garnet
who's the they? Order?
I'm confused too. Alex is Snape!!!!!
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:38 am
by Libra
They is the Order. The message they wanted her to record is the one she tells Jonas about his parents. Remember how she insisted it was video tapped? Yup.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:01 am
by watermelonhead
Alex is your run-of-the-mill succubus, don't trust her, EVER.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:19 pm
by Leaven
garnet wrote:
I'm confused too. Alex is Snape!!!!!
LMAO! you win at life.
I thought the last video was so boring and I hate the whole Alex is good boohoo thing. I hope she still screws them over in some way.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:54 pm
by jonasrawks
Leaven wrote:garnet wrote:
I'm confused too. Alex is Snape!!!!!
LMAO! you win at life.
I thought the last video was so boring and I hate the whole Alex is good boohoo thing. I hope she still screws them over in some way.
How dare you! Alex is good!
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:33 pm
by Leaven
No she's bad!
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:03 pm
by mincartaugh
Is not!
Is too!
Is not!
Is too!
Is not!
Is too!
Is not!
Is too!
OK. That's enough of that. Move on to something constructive, please.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:06 pm
by CRYISME
I think Alex is going to double cross them. But shouldn't the order know where Alex's house in Mexico is at.
Why have they not tried to find them yet?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:44 pm
by Jamidru
Is NOT!!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:03 pm
by Leaven
mincartaugh wrote:Is not!
Is too!
Is not!
Is too!
Is not!
Is too!
Is not!
Is too!
OK. That's enough of that. Move on to something constructive, please.
Oh lighten up. That's what the
was for. To show it was just a bit of silliness.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
by JustAnotherLonelyGirl.
I didn't hear "I've" I thought she said "I recorded the message they wanted." I'm not being picky; that difference is a big one. If she said "I," it is obvious she means that one message. But "I've" has a different connotation, like she had another message to record before she could apologize or something.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:11 pm
by CRYISME
CRYISME wrote:I think if Alex acted out the message for the order in "Alex is..." how do we know now she is not acting?
I posted this somewhere else, but i wanted to get an opinion