Page 1 of 1

Watchers - Good or Evil?

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:10 am
by nobackspacebutton
In the most recent video, Jonas seems to start a fight with a watcher that was outside of his house. It seems like the Watcher really didn't put up a fight, really didn't seem phased, and really didn't seem like he was going to hurt them.

The Watcher didn't even pay attention to Bree. He didn't try to grab her, he didn't say anything to either of them.

Nothing.

Perhaps the Watchers are just litterally "Watchers". Their purpose is to "watch". But are they really part of the Order? Or are they part of a good-guy sort of team, that just "watches" Bree and her friends, almost protecting them?

What do you think?

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:57 am
by Biglancer01
It makes kinda of sense. Considering Gemma, was warning BRee about them once. Since see wors for Opaphid, she wouldn't do that if they were working for them.

N3ural N3t - watchers?

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:58 am
by asti
Could it be that the watchers are recruiting - "n3ural n3t?

:?: :?: :?: :shock: :?: :?: :?:

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:18 am
by Inigo
Biglancer01 wrote:It makes kinda of sense. Considering Gemma, was warning BRee about them once. Since see wors for Opaphid, she wouldn't do that if they were working for them.

Just because Gemma turned out to be a traitor, doesn't mean everything she said is a lie.

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:29 am
by colbertnationgirl
kinda...ya.

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:31 am
by Ziola
So, we know for a fact that the Watchers are a part of OpAphid. Op herself has confirmed that they work for the Order. So, whether or not you believe they are evil depends on your view of the Order.

For obvious reasons, I think they are on the side of good :)

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:43 am
by PinkoLady
Inigo wrote:
Biglancer01 wrote:It makes kinda of sense. Considering Gemma, was warning BRee about them once. Since see wors for Opaphid, she wouldn't do that if they were working for them.

Just because Gemma turned out to be a traitor, doesn't mean everything she said is a lie.
But then why would she warn them about Watchers, causing them to run away from them?

It doesn't mean everything is a lie, but it definitely calls every motive into question.

(Not that I doubt the Watchers are Op's guys--- I'm just saying, it makes sense to question everything she did)

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:44 am
by kayokosaeki
Ziola wrote:So, we know for a fact that the Watchers are a part of OpAphid. Op herself has confirmed that they work for the Order. So, whether or not you believe they are evil depends on your view of the Order.

For obvious reasons, I think they are on the side of good :)
sorry, i missed that. where did she confirm they were part of the order?

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:49 am
by Ziola
When Tachyon said that she eliminated her babysitter, Op mentioned that one of her watchers would no longer be able to.

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:10 pm
by Lurker
Ziola wrote:When Tachyon said that she eliminated her babysitter, Op mentioned that one of her watchers would no longer be able to.
Can you link us to where that is for confirmation? I thought it was always implied that the "babysitters" (as both Op and Tach call them) were Watchers, but I don't remember it ever being spelled out that way. Thanks in advance.

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:23 pm
by Ziola
FallingIntoSin wrote:New update on Op's YouTube site: It's located next to T's last vid.

"Tachyon didn't behave for her sitter...and unfortunately he will not be able to sit her again in the future (or anyone else for that matter).

We will see to it that her next sitter is a little more "proactive," and less tolerant of any bad behavior."

I guess we better be ready for some action!
I'm still searching for Tachyon's reference to it...

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:27 pm
by Lurker
Ziola wrote:
FallingIntoSin wrote:New update on Op's YouTube site: It's located next to T's last vid.

"Tachyon didn't behave for her sitter...and unfortunately he will not be able to sit her again in the future (or anyone else for that matter).

We will see to it that her next sitter is a little more "proactive," and less tolerant of any bad behavior."

I guess we better be ready for some action!
I'm still searching for Tachyon's reference to it...
Alright, please do, and thanks. The only references from Tach I know of are these three:

http://lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic ... 0759#80759
http://lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic ... 5685#85685
http://lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic ... 397#104397

Still just more usage of "babysitter" there (which I think implies watching, but it would sure put a lot of speculation to rest if we could confirm it).
PinkoLady wrote:
Inigo wrote:
Biglancer01 wrote:It makes kinda of sense. Considering Gemma, was warning BRee about them once. Since see wors for Opaphid, she wouldn't do that if they were working for them.

Just because Gemma turned out to be a traitor, doesn't mean everything she said is a lie.
But then why would she warn them about Watchers, causing them to run away from them?
Perhaps to scare them and remind them that they'd never get away.

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:44 am
by ApotheosisAZ
Some are good. Some are evil.

The intention is for them simply to watch and report. In that sense, they are all neutral.