Page 1 of 2

I designed and submited this one...what do you think?

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:14 pm
by AZstatebaby
Image

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:43 pm
by AZstatebaby
a lot of people looked but no comments. I just liked the general concept...I'm aware the graphic could use some work. I thought it was a very Bree-ish idea.

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:35 pm
by livelongandprosper77
Yeah i see what you are saying about the graphic deal yo but hey sometimes the graphic isn't everything. The concept is not bad at all ehhe. Makes me kinda think of Pacman looking at the Green monster eheh and yes feed the addiction feed it! 8)

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:33 pm
by Holden
Yeah I think with all the stuffed animals Bree has you could easily make the graphic a pmonkey or Owen. Maybe taking a bite out of a cookie from the cookie contest. I dunno or something like that.

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:43 pm
by PushedButton
No offense but I don't like it much.

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:12 pm
by HyeMew
I mean it's not bad for something done in Paint, I like the monster, though the official design would need to be something more sophisticated.
Also dotcom should not be written out, it'd probably confuse some people. I mean anyone who knows the first thing about the internet should be able to make the conversion in head from dotcom to .com, but that doesn't mean some actually will haha.

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:51 am
by Sami
The monster was funny, but I didn't like it that much. Good try though ^^b

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:03 am
by curriguy
good concept, but poor execution. It looks like it was made in windows paintbrush.

if you redo it with adobe illustrator...and give it a more handdrawn feel, it might be cooler

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:40 am
by Scrawnyfish
"Feed the Addiction" would be a good solgan if you had the picture with p-monkey in her mouth.

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:20 pm
by AZstatebaby
curriguy wrote:good concept, but poor execution. It looks like it was made in windows paintbrush.
It was done with a windows paintbrush smart one...not all of us are high tech and rich like you.

hmm

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:06 pm
by jsmith
don't lose hope man,

Your design is certainly better than what I could personally do and is probably better than some others could do as well. As far as i'm concerned, I would wear your shirt and I believe it could be a winner - though I am not judging the contest.

To everyone in general,

It does not matter what software is used to create the drawing, all that matters is the heart and soul put into it; the effort.

I'm a programmer. As a programmer, I use IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and compilers (converts code to a .exe). Think of an IDE as a souped up text editor.

There are many IDEs... Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 (comparable to photoshop or illustrater), Dev-C++ (more like paint/paintbrush), and even notepad (not really an IDE but can be used to code) which is even less sophisticated than paint/paintbrush.

It doesn't matter which IDE I use to code, because code is code and I can produce the same results either way.

Art is art and it doesn't matter what software you use to create it.

Re: hmm

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:08 pm
by PushedButton
jsmith wrote:don't lose hope man,

Your design is certainly better than what I could personally do and is probably better than some others could do as well. As far as i'm concerned, I would wear your shirt and I believe it could be a winner - though I am not judging the contest.

To everyone in general,

It does not matter what software is used to create the drawing, all that matters is the heart and soul put into it; the effort.

I'm a programmer. As a programmer, I use IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and compilers (converts code to a .exe). Think of an IDE as a souped up text editor.

There are many IDEs... Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 (comparable to photoshop or illustrater), Dev-C++ (more like paint/paintbrush), and even notepad (not really an IDE but can be used to code) which is even less sophisticated than paint/paintbrush.

It doesn't matter which IDE I use to code, because code is code and I can produce the same results either way.

Art is art and it doesn't matter what software you use to create it.

....and just as you can produce crappy code you can produce crappy artwork.

Re: hmm

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:13 pm
by GoodGollyItsHolly
PushedButton wrote:
jsmith wrote:don't lose hope man,

Your design is certainly better than what I could personally do and is probably better than some others could do as well. As far as i'm concerned, I would wear your shirt and I believe it could be a winner - though I am not judging the contest.

To everyone in general,

It does not matter what software is used to create the drawing, all that matters is the heart and soul put into it; the effort.

I'm a programmer. As a programmer, I use IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and compilers (converts code to a .exe). Think of an IDE as a souped up text editor.

There are many IDEs... Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 (comparable to photoshop or illustrater), Dev-C++ (more like paint/paintbrush), and even notepad (not really an IDE but can be used to code) which is even less sophisticated than paint/paintbrush.

It doesn't matter which IDE I use to code, because code is code and I can produce the same results either way.

Art is art and it doesn't matter what software you use to create it.

....and just as you can produce crappy code you can produce crappy artwork.

I really hate when people say nasty mean things....

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:14 pm
by jsmith
....and just as you can produce crappy code you can produce crappy artwork.
You could state your opinion a little nicer than that. I feel he did a good job. Even if you do not think the artwork is that good, you can at least state that in a nice manner and recognize his efforts.

He admitted before any comments came through that he too felt the graphic could use work. I won't deny that. It is quite an effort on his part though. He took the time to do this and then publically submitted it to comment knowing it needed work. I admire him.

I would like to mention to the general public now that I am not meaning this post to be offensive to anyone.

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:29 pm
by PushedButton
jsmith wrote:
....and just as you can produce crappy code you can produce crappy artwork.
You could state your opinion a little nicer than that. I feel he did a good job. Even if you do not think the artwork is that good, you can at least state that in a nice manner and recognize his efforts.

He admitted before any comments came through that he too felt the graphic could use work. I won't deny that. It is quite an effort on his part though. He took the time to do this and then publically submitted it to comment knowing it needed work. I admire him.

I would like to mention to the general public now that I am not meaning this post to be offensive to anyone.

Hold on, hold on.... I was merely reiterating what has already been said... ok, it was a little blunt, but I meant no offense and I apologize if I caused any.