Page 1 of 2

Crowley and Bree

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:10 pm
by TheLoveOfInsanity
in the video "Mysteries of My Past...Revealed!", Bree talks about how she moved from America, to Austrailia, to England, then back to America (I think)

in Daniel's "Aliester Crowley" video, he discusses an article which says that Crowley might have been involved in the kidnapping of a young girl from Arizona.

I'm not sure if these relate to eachother at all, but it makes me wonder:

Is it possible that Bree's Parents aren't really her parents?
Could she have been kidnapped like that girl from Arizona?
IS SHE that girl from Arizona?

I don't know. I'm probably reading too much into it. I don't know everything.

What do you guys think?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:22 pm
by storyteller
The girl kidnapped in Arizona was kidnapped in like 1943- boy Bree would have to be aging well- and she wasn't an infant when she was kidnapped. It's also the wrong time frame for her mother to have been the kidnapped girl.

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:29 pm
by TheLoveOfInsanity
storyteller wrote:The girl kidnapped in Arizona was kidnapped in like 1943- boy Bree would have to be aging well- and she wasn't an infant when she was kidnapped. It's also the wrong time frame for her mother to have been the kidnapped girl.
OOH. Okay. Haha. I feel a little silly now. Didn't do my research.

BUT...

Although I was completly wrong about the Arizona girl thing,
isn't it possible for Bree to have been a different kidnapped child?

I just think that there's a specific reason for Daniel to bring up the kidnapping thing in that particular video. After all, this is scripted.

Also, why is it so important to the "deacons" that SHE is the one chosen for the ceremony?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:32 pm
by storyteller
TheLoveOfInsanity wrote:
storyteller wrote:The girl kidnapped in Arizona was kidnapped in like 1943- boy Bree would have to be aging well- and she wasn't an infant when she was kidnapped. It's also the wrong time frame for her mother to have been the kidnapped girl.
OOH. Okay. Haha. I feel a little silly now. Didn't do my research.

BUT...

Although I was completly wrong about the Arizona girl thing,
isn't it possible for Bree to have been a different kidnapped child?

I just think that there's a specific reason for Daniel to bring up the kidnapping thing in that particular video. After all, this is scripted.

Also, why is it so important to the "deacons" that SHE is the one chosen for the ceremony?
Well, that's a great questions, but all we've got right now are a ton of questions and no real clues to lead us to any answers. It oculd be anything.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:12 am
by Magesa
Great questions people!

That's a possible connection, but seriously, anything could be possible. I'm not even entirely sure the creators know exactly where they're going with this. I'm good at predicting the storyline of books, but this isn't a book storyline. Its scripted, but in such a unique modem. Oh well, more surprises and more speculation I suppose!

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:13 pm
by prapagandaseden
well am just a mutated chicken from cyberspace but i have my own idea on this...

what if Daniel is in on the kidnapping/taking of the child idea....think about it....yeah he is like 18-ish but no parent is just going to let there kid go on a trip with some MINOR girl all wiily nilly.

plus why would some guy like Aliester Crowley risk the exposure and calories to do the dirty work himself

i dunno....what i am trying to say is that what if Daniel is in the cult too and taking Bree to the people/deacona....just seems like a twist

plus i have been reading some of the theories and i really dont think that The Creators base their plot on what the forums say....it just doesnt seem logical....yeah we could be an idea base but not the sole development

and another thing....

i was reading about the creators lack of funds (as a vet of having a website with fans...yeah it was a sailormoon fanfic wanna fight about it.....i know how pricie it can be....

so i was thinking....

WHAT ABOUT A BAKE SALE......LG15 style!!!

anyone want to join me....or maybe i dunno shoot me :lol: down?!?! :lol:

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:10 am
by Magesa
Oooh, Bake Sale!

But you better not be against Daniel! I LOOOOOOOOOOOOVE Daniel!

(although it would be a twist)

(and there are some inconsistances)

(but seriously, DANIEL?)

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:04 am
by missviolet
Aleister Crowley wouldn't be doing the dirty work himself.

Primarily because he's been dead for yeeeears. Jimmy Page lives in his house in England.

And there's a lot of speculation about Daniel being just let free to run around on his own, but a) he's an adult at 18, and b) he's graduated high school so he doesn't have to be anywhere, and c) his parents let him just run off with his friends randomly for a few days, so they may not even know it's Bree that Daniel's with.

The kidnapping twist would be kind of interesting, though.

p.s. I make *killer* butterscotch brownies, and if the creators really need the $2 a plate I could probably get from them out here in hickville, I'd be willing to donate. :)

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:05 am
by prapagandaseden
Daniel would be more like a helper...there to help bree but his loyalty would be with the deacons....

ohh!

we can sell deacon delights! and lonelygirl bakersdozen 15

and p. monkey crunch

and owen oatmeal...

god i have no like

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:08 am
by missviolet
*grumble*

Now I want cookies.

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:45 am
by Icaterus
Actually Bree went to New Zealand before she went to Australia!! Jeez don't leave out NZ people :evil:.

Oh and prapagandaseden your avatar is from the best anime ever! Chobits rofl I loved that!

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 7:41 pm
by iqfrenzy
prapagandaseden wrote:Daniel would be more like a helper...there to help bree but his loyalty would be with the deacons....

ohh!

we can sell deacon delights! and lonelygirl bakersdozen 15

and p. monkey crunch

and owen oatmeal...

god i have no like
lol @ I have no life. Seriously, I resemble that remark.

This thread is quite interesting. It is strange that no one can find anything about Crowley being involved in an Arizona kidnapping, yet Daniel has said it in the video.

Good theorizing, whoever started this thread (Sorry, I forgot).

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:36 am
by Magesa
missviolet wrote:p.s. I make *killer* butterscotch brownies, and if the creators really need the $2 a plate I could probably get from them out here in hickville, I'd be willing to donate. :)
Sounds great! I want one! :o

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:38 am
by Magesa
Okay, since I feel guilty for posting something random, I'll post something intelligent.

CAN'T YOU SEE THAT DANIEL LOVES BREE?

(really neat idea though)

(I'm not sure how intelligent that sounded)

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:27 am
by iqfrenzy
Magesa wrote:Okay, since I feel guilty for posting something random, I'll post something intelligent.

CAN'T YOU SEE THAT DANIEL LOVES BREE?

(really neat idea though)

(I'm not sure how intelligent that sounded)
Yeah, I do, Magesa, but it's still fun to toss these things around. But I think you are right. I don't think Daniel would ever turn on Bree. If there's any turning to be done, I think it would be the other way around...although I don't see that happening either. I think these two have a bond that won't allow for that kind of betrayal by either of them.