Page 7 of 7
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:11 pm
by nobackspacebutton
Inigo wrote:GoodGollyItsHolly (send note) Says:
December 9th, 2006 at 11:13 pm
I am not a plant, its absolutly rediculous that it was even suggested I am posting on the forums all the time, about nonsense too.
There ya go.
lol =D ty
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:14 pm
by GoodGollyItsHolly
You guys are all so silly. Im not a character, I am a fan, who daniel requested some help from. You heard it here first! hahah
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:15 pm
by Inigo
Speak of the devil.
Ya see? Dont worry holly I believe you
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:15 pm
by GoodGollyItsHolly
The YouTube account is fake. Not mine, and it looks to have been just created.
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:21 pm
by livelongandprosper77
hahaha you got nothing but love on here from people Holly i think alot are just jealous of ya but personally i like your decision good job

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:27 pm
by nobackspacebutton
livelongandprosper77 wrote:hahaha you got nothing but love on here from people Holly i think alot are just jealous of ya but personally i like your decision good job

Nothing but love here too ^_^
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:40 pm
by GoodGollyItsHolly
Thanks! *high five*
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:12 pm
by TJ Marsh
There has to be a reason Holly was Chosen, i guess we will find out sooner in the Future??
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
by EliCash
i think alot are just jealous of ya but personally i like your decision good job
This is incredibly stupid. I not only agree with her decision, but I'm happy with where it led. And Holly's suggestion that it's "ridiculous" to suggest the POSSIBILITY of her being an official character is, in fact, ridiculous. There's nothing wrong with the Creators making a fake poster to the forum. Nothing. So there's nothing wrong with us looking into that possibility.
We need to keep an open mind about everybody. That means Gemma, Bree, Daniel, OpAphid, Watchers -- and yes, even those of us posting here. Nobody jumped to false conclusions, and I think the suggestion that forum members acted inappropriately is harmful to those of us who care about looking at this story with the watchful eye it deserves.
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:18 am
by nobackspacebutton
EliCash wrote:
This is incredibly stupid. I not only agree with her decision, but I'm happy with where it led. And Holly's suggestion that it's "ridiculous" to suggest the POSSIBILITY of her being an official character is, in fact, ridiculous. There's nothing wrong with the Creators making a fake poster to the forum. Nothing. So there's nothing wrong with us looking into that possibility.
Its true...she could lie. Just because the Creators have made a point not to lie, but to ignore questions, and Holly has specifically said she is not involved...doesn't make it true or untrue. Anything is a possibility and the story can take us anywhere. I still do believe there had to be a better reason behind choosing her besides her being 'the ultimate' jonas girl.
EliCash wrote:
We need to keep an open mind about everybody. That means Gemma, Bree, Daniel, OpAphid, Watchers -- and yes, even those of us posting here. Nobody jumped to false conclusions, and I think the suggestion that forum members acted inappropriately is harmful to those of us who care about looking at this story with the watchful eye it deserves.
Yes, I agree it is best to keep an open mind. Believe what you will. That's the freedom we all have while posting at these forums. Free Will is our power. (Bree's mom would be happy=P)
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:37 am
by wintermute
nobackspacebutton wrote: I still do believe there had to be a better reason behind choosing her besides her being 'the ultimate' jonas girl.
They could have just picked one of the top contributors to the board at random.
'mute
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:55 am
by nobackspacebutton
wintermute wrote:nobackspacebutton wrote: I still do believe there had to be a better reason behind choosing her besides her being 'the ultimate' jonas girl.
They could have just picked one of the top contributors to the board at random.
'mute
thats true...she comes in 6th in most posts
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:06 pm
by wintermute
nobackspacebutton wrote:wintermute wrote:They could have just picked one of the top contributors to the board at random.
'mute
thats true...she comes in 6th in most posts
I'm trying to fix my "reading to much into things" problem, if you couldn't tell.
'mute