Page 7 of 10
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:55 pm
by dlruss0216
Qoinz wrote:wintermute wrote:
This proves one thing... Cassie is watching
ME
and taunting me with her "BE READY!"
'mute
speaking of taunting. Literaly seconds after we solved the morse code/ anagram puzzle today, Cassie took it off her profile. I had a huge hunch she was taunting us or letting us know she reads of forums which would be a rather illogical move on her part. But anyways she ended up putting the clue back mins later.
I'm still seeing it there, and I refreshed to be sure. What was removed specifically?
EDIT - Oh duh, just read where you said she put it back up again. I wonder why she'd take it down and then put it back up again?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:56 pm
by SR
Qoinz wrote:SR wrote:A good point raised is why she put the tinyurl in her message again, why hammer it in? Is it that we need to fully decode the meaning of the message in order to be ready on the first?
possible. but the idea has been raised that the tiny urls have had significance to this umm game thats not a game

... did we every figure out a proposed significance for the last one?(the one we are talking about) could be why shes posting it again
Tinyurls cannot be controlled, there can be no significance to them as wshe has no power. Unless she made up something from the random url she got. I'm thinking something may either be hidden in the poem or in the image itself that we are missing.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:56 pm
by wintermute
SR wrote:wintermute wrote:SR wrote:Wow, that was impressive, a couple of hours and wham, bam, clue and solution.
No fun for the ones that weren't here!
I know... I left about 2 hours ago... Come back, and the thread was just beginning... By the time I caught up, it was solved...
This proves one thing... Cassie is watching
ME
and taunting me with her "BE READY!"
'mute
At least she can't complain, everyone was on the button this time.
I'm gonna leave for dinner in just a bit. You watch. Either Cassie will post another clue while I'm gone, or she'll be at the table next to me... I'm convinced she's watching me

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:58 pm
by Luv2Luvem
SR wrote:
Tinyurls cannot be controlled, there can be no significance to them as wshe has no power. Unless she made up something from the random url she got. I'm thinking something may either be hidden in the poem or in the image itself that we are missing.
It's the poem..it has to be. She keeps posting the same pic of the finished poem. I just can't think of what we're missing.

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:59 pm
by SR
Luv2Luvem wrote:SR wrote:
Tinyurls cannot be controlled, there can be no significance to them as wshe has no power. Unless she made up something from the random url she got. I'm thinking something may either be hidden in the poem or in the image itself that we are missing.
It's the poem..it has to be. She keeps posting the same pic of the finished poem. I just can't think of what we're missing.

We maybe missing something else hidden in the image of the poem.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:59 pm
by lordgreystoke422
wintermute wrote:Anyone figure out the MD5DQ part yet? Maybe a tinyurl?
'mute
Edit: Nope... Not a tinyurl...
Looks like a ham radio address...I THINK..but I dunno.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:00 pm
by Mirage
SR wrote:Luv2Luvem wrote:SR wrote:
Tinyurls cannot be controlled, there can be no significance to them as wshe has no power. Unless she made up something from the random url she got. I'm thinking something may either be hidden in the poem or in the image itself that we are missing.
It's the poem..it has to be. She keeps posting the same pic of the finished poem. I just can't think of what we're missing.

We maybe missing something else hidden in the image of the poem.
I was just thinking that. Has anyone de-stegged the image?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:00 pm
by Qoinz
My bad wasnt awear tiny urls werent controlable. Well then we are left with 2 options? she wants us to figure something else out with the poem, or shes leaving some sort of clue for people who maybe dont have the resource of visiting a forum like this and by chance forgot the end of her tiny url? If she wants us to be ready and whatnot, its in her best interest to leave the trail to the poem untill its importance has passed.
And about her taking the clue off her profile that I mentioned earlier, it was only for a min and then it was put back up. Im not sure how Youtube works but maybe she forgot to save and exit or something, or maybe she really is taunting us.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:00 pm
by Luv2Luvem
SR wrote:Luv2Luvem wrote:SR wrote:
Tinyurls cannot be controlled, there can be no significance to them as wshe has no power. Unless she made up something from the random url she got. I'm thinking something may either be hidden in the poem or in the image itself that we are missing.
It's the poem..it has to be. She keeps posting the same pic of the finished poem. I just can't think of what we're missing.

We maybe missing something else hidden in the image of the poem.
Oh! There's an idea! I didn't think of that.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:01 pm
by SR
lordgreystoke422 wrote:wintermute wrote:Anyone figure out the MD5DQ part yet? Maybe a tinyurl?
'mute
Edit: Nope... Not a tinyurl...
Looks like a ham radio address...I THINK..but I dunno.
It is a tinyurl!
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:01 pm
by wintermute
Mirage wrote:I was just thinking that. Has anyone de-stegged the image?
Didn't look stegged to me, but I didn't run any tools on it to rule it out...
'mute
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:03 pm
by Luv2Luvem
After looking at it yet again...do we know for sure what the doodling (for lack of a better word) in the background of the poem is?
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:04 pm
by Mirage
Hmm...
I could try it out, but in a little while 'cause I'm eatting dinner at the computer...again! Heh.
If anything, it's worth a shot, I suppose.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:05 pm
by SR
Luv2Luvem wrote:After looking at it yet again...do we know for sure what the doodling (for lack of a better word) in the background of the poem is?
It's actually the foreground, there may be deeper layers to it. I read throught the source code image and it was apparently made with adobe photoshop, meaning all sort's of shit could be hidden there.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:13 pm
by dynamite_diva01
Nothing quite interesting on Serapis on my side. Sorry guys.

Gotta go to bed now.