Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:07 pm
Man, I hope that was Gemma , she's so fine! woo
Forum to post messages about Bree and Danielbeast
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7784
How would Daniel have acquired chloroform?longlostposter wrote:I agree with everything you've said here, gidd, except the part that a triggered Daniel would have been shown on vid. The captor is never shown in any of the abductions, and I don't see why the Order would need to know that Daniel had been triggered. There would have been a plan already in place, and they would have known how it would go down.giddeanx wrote:Ok I said before and I will say it again. This video should actually prove to everyone that niether of the boys are Order.
Don't forget that this is a private video, meaning its interoffice communication, they wouldn't have to fake anything no one else will see it.
Jonas would not have to fake his capture. Because if he is order the order knows it.
Due to the fact that this is a hit confirmation video. Daniel would be shown taking Bree or Jonas, because if he had a trigger and it was to be activated the order would already know.
There is no damning evidence to be had.
Oh Luminous I posted an idea on your first light it got buried quick hope you saw it.
Yeah. Not to mention the fact that most gas stations keep security videos running in the store and pumps.They grab these kids, chloroform them, throw them in a van and steal their car -- without any fear of being caught. They seem very sure that they are completely untouchable.
Yes! I'm better every gas station on the strip has security cameras! Chances are they've been caught on tape abducting the trio.house wrote:Yeah. Not to mention the fact that most gas stations keep security videos running in the store and pumps.They grab these kids, chloroform them, throw them in a van and steal their car -- without any fear of being caught. They seem very sure that they are completely untouchable.
And, re: helicopter.
You can catch a helicopter RIGHT ON THE STRIP for a nighttime tour of the strip. They run those things on that exact route all day long (and into evening). I realize that there was some symbolization of helicopters, but... if there's any point to them being in the story, they're not there because the creators fronted the money for them.
wow , and I thought i was the only lonleyfan with a lesbian laptopSappho wrote:You have a gay laptop? My laptop is a lesbian. She takes excellent screenshots. Maybe your laptop won't cooperate because he thinks you don't like gays.Shaneener wrote:I can't take a screen cap because my laptop is gay,
oh man imagine if it actually was Gemma, and Gemma was coming to save them.watermelonhead wrote:Man, I hope that was Gemma , she's so fine! woo
yeah, megs, Gidd and I have a pretty cool relationship; we've fallen into a sparring partners relationship of sorts, but I think we both agree that the other is worth sparring with.giddeanx wrote:Oh I wouldn't argue with Juli. It's just spirited debate. However, a new video would be great. But just so you know when it comes out, there will be even more arg... oops sorry debate.megs229 wrote:Arrgghhhh. I am tired of all the argueing associated with this video. My thoughts are that they should just cough up a new video already so that we can all have something new to ponder![]()
Nice, Gidd. I see what you are saying, and I think that you might be right.giddeanx wrote:![]()
Its not a person at all. Thats where I think my mind was going.
The shoulder that everyone sees is created by the lens filter that is used throughout the film (the shadowy shape around the screen). The hanky is a light. The left arm is also a bank of florecents. The belt is also a light.
Due to the movement in the shot the lights stretched out creating rectangular shapes.
The big clue is how insubstancial the shape is. It does not block or reflect light. In a heavily lighted area more detail would be present.
Sure, whats the fun of posting if you don't have someone to bounce ideas off of.longlostposter wrote: Would you agree, Gidd?
Chelseyrl wrote:This whole thread is a joke now. (I'm not saying this just because of your post, there are plenty of other things floating in it that could be trimmed out so this would be smaller and more managable to decipher this vid.)
LadyBugGirl wrote:Chelseyrl wrote:This whole thread is a joke now. (I'm not saying this just because of your post, there are plenty of other things floating in it that could be trimmed out so this would be smaller and more managable to decipher this vid.)
Agreed. No one reads anyone elses responses so we have the same thing coming up every 2 posts and people are over analyzing everything...
:::sigh
This is turning into a classic light switch thread.