Page 5 of 9

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:23 pm
by alysaface
KitWisdom wrote:
tiltingwindward wrote:So, I think the post-it note is the most interesting thing in the drop so far. It looks to me like this note is directed at OpA, which means that Tach intended for the contents of this drop to get back to OpA. If this is the case, then why is Tach telling OpA that she "has to play by their rules" right now? Does this mean that Tach doesn't necessarily want to be opposing OpA?

Alternative theory: Tach was staying with someone, or someone was helping her, and that person (persons?) were urging her to make her peace (with OpA? with Mom & Dad?). Either way, she's saying she has to play by a different set of rules (whose?), and whatever she did to her sitter, she left behind for the person who was helping her to clean up. In this case, the drop was NOT intended for OpA, but nor was it intended for Brother. Who else is Tach leaving drops for?
And what's the mess she's referring to? It made me think of the ransacking of the motel room. Maybe Tach is still undercover as a watcher? Maybe she ransacked the room, making sure it was a mess so Bree and Daniel would know someone had been there?
that's what i thought too, but wasn't it opa that posted the video? so that wouldn't really make too much sense.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:23 pm
by ForeverMourn
Tach undercover as a watcher would be a god tie in, but Tach said she worked with computers when she was in The Order.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:25 pm
by JustAnotherLonelyGirl.
KitWisdom wrote:
ForeverMourn wrote:She once said when she can't get to her family she relies on her "Friends" . And Bree's birthday was not too long ago. Maybe it was meant for Daniel and Bree.
I was thinking the Birthday Girl alluded to Bree, but I thought Tach and Brother didn't really know Bree and Dainel. Didn't Brother refer to Daniel as 'that kid from JC'? Doesn't seem like he knows Daniel at least.
Maybe Tachyon met Bree at some point during her travels, when she wasn't with Brother? Or maybe Bree shares her birthday with someone? What was the exact date.. is there any significance?

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:25 pm
by justtommie
And what's the mess she's referring to? It made me think of the ransacking of the motel room. Maybe Tach is still undercover as a watcher? Maybe she ransacked the room, making sure it was a mess so Bree and Daniel would know someone had been there?
That whole mess bit, made me think she really messed up the person that was suppos to be "baby sitting" her.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:25 pm
by tiltingwindward
alysaface wrote:
KitWisdom wrote: And what's the mess she's referring to? It made me think of the ransacking of the motel room. Maybe Tach is still undercover as a watcher? Maybe she ransacked the room, making sure it was a mess so Bree and Daniel would know someone had been there?
that's what i thought too, but wasn't it opa that posted the video? so that wouldn't really make too much sense.
It was OpA who posted that video. I think the mess being referred to is the mess Tach left of her sitter...ewww.
Hey Tilting, I love you for keeping the Forums alive.

/me hugtackles Tilting
is tackled

I love the forums! They're my favorite place for fair and balanced OpA news.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:27 pm
by JustAnotherLonelyGirl.
justtommie wrote:
And what's the mess she's referring to? It made me think of the ransacking of the motel room. Maybe Tach is still undercover as a watcher? Maybe she ransacked the room, making sure it was a mess so Bree and Daniel would know someone had been there?
That whole mess bit, made me think she really messed up the person that was suppos to be "baby sitting" her.
I thought that was weird because I was under the impression that OpA was supposed to be "babysitting" Bree and Daniel. Could OpA have been going to the motel to clean up after Tach messed it up?

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:32 pm
by ForeverMourn
JustAnotherLonelyGirl. wrote: Could OpA have been going to the motel to clean up after Tach messed it up?
I don't think that's it.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:34 pm
by alysaface
i'm pretty sure tilt has it right.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:38 pm
by Jewelybug
Just wanted to note, that the girl from the revver video and the girl from the YT video is in question. It looks like the same girl.. but different shots.

The whole video isthe same except the part with the girl in it.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:38 pm
by ForeverMourn
I think Tach knocked off her sitter. Hence the "X" on the card.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:42 pm
by alysaface
Jewelybug wrote:Just wanted to note, that the girl from the revver video and the girl from the YT video is in question. It looks like the same girl.. but different shots.

The whole video isthe same except the part with the girl in it.
hmm aparentaly tach just deleted the video on YT, i just went to go look, and it said it deleted by the user.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:45 pm
by trainer101
ForeverMourn wrote:I think Tach knocked off her sitter. Hence the "X" on the card.
This would tie in with Tilt's theory of the "mess".
It's also entirely possible that the birthday card is meant for Bree. Brother refers to Daniel as that "kid in JC", so he at least knows of Daniel. Perhaps they've even met and Daniel never put the pieces together. After all, he cannot even remember Cassie who was clearly one of Bree's only friends. Or perhaps he just has a 'convenient' memory.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:46 pm
by ForeverMourn
Jewelybug wrote:Just wanted to note, that the girl from the revver video and the girl from the YT video is in question. It looks like the same girl.. but different shots.
Yeah, they are two slightly different shots.

Image

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:47 pm
by Jewelybug
It looks like more than slightly to me

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:47 pm
by alysaface
they look a little different, the whole videos not just the girl.