Forum to post messages about Bree and Danielbeast
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9644
this one is creepy and awesomecolbertnationgirl wrote:I probably would.Jo_16_2 wrote:so dont try to watch The Messengers, you would diecolbertnationgirl wrote:I just watched the trailer for On Bloody Sunday, and there is no way I'll be able to watch that movie.Horror movies scare me.
of course it iscolbertnationgirl wrote:Creepy is not awesome.
Jo_16_2 wrote:of course it iscolbertnationgirl wrote:Creepy is not awesome.
No it isn't.becomeSim7lizard wrote:**runs in front of the mirror***
Did I became transparent???
No!!! Hmmmm weird!!!!!
How are you?
Incompatibilists tend to think that determinism is at odds with moral responsibility. It seems impossible that one can hold someone responsible for an action that could be predicted from the beginning of time. Hard determinists say "So much the worse for free will!" and discard the concept. Clarence Darrow, the famous defense attorney, pleaded the innocence of his clients, Leopold and Loeb, by invoking such a notion of hard determinism. During his summation, he declared:
What has this boy to do with it? He was not his own father; he was not his own mother; he was not his own grandparents. All of this was handed to him. He did not surround himself with governesses and wealth. He did not make himself. And yet he is to be compelled to pay.
Conversely, libertarians say "So much the worse for determinism!" Daniel Dennett asks why anyone would care about whether someone had the property of responsibility and speculates that the idea of moral responsibility may be "a purely metaphysical hankering". Jean-Paul Sartre argues that people sometimes avoid incrimination and responsibility by hiding behind determinism: "... we are always ready to take refuge in a belief in determinism if this freedom weighs upon us or if we need an excuse". However, the position that classifying such people as "base" or "dishonest" makes no difference to whether or not their actions are determined is quite as tenable.
The issue of moral responsibility is at the heart of the dispute between hard determinists and compatibilists. Hard determinists are forced to accept that individuals often have "free will" in the compatibilist sense, but they deny that this sense of free will can ground moral responsibility. The fact that an agent's choices are unforced, hard determinists claim, does not change the fact that determinism robs the agent of responsibility.
