Page 4 of 5

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:31 am
by islandlove
they wrote on his face


haha

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:44 am
by kayokosaeki
damn it creators! :smt065

you have let me down. let us hope it is the last time. [-X

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:47 am
by kellylen
haha the jonas was here was classic.

i still wish it was t-bagging haha

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:40 am
by aeryolol
AWW I was expecting more :cry:


Next thing to ponder: what is going to happen to the I.D? :o

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:11 am
by je_sais_cequisetrame
Hahahaha, he looks good in glasses.... :)

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:38 pm
by Taig
kayokosaeki wrote:damn it creators! :smt065

you have let me down. let us hope it is the last time. [-X
LOL!!! If they haven't let you down up until now my friend, then you are not easily disappointed!

Oh how I wish I could have little bit of whatever it is that keeps you from being let down.

Now this is NOT directed at you but your comment reminds me how very , very often we have been let down.

This episode is certainly a let down, but just another among many.

Oh I could go on, but I'm tired and I really don't see the point in doing so.


sigh

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:47 pm
by girlAnachronism
I really hope that was not all Jonas did to him. Maybe there's something ELSE that happened that DB was too embarrassed to talk about...

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:56 pm
by aeryolol
We should make this board: What Jonas should have done to him.

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:34 pm
by longlostposter
Aeryolol, can you explain why you felt the need to resurrect this thread? Just curious.

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:36 pm
by freakish
longlostposter, can you explain why you feel the need to sugarcoat the fact that your annoyed at this threat being reposted even though it has nothing to do with you? just curious.

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:43 pm
by longlostposter
freakish wrote:longlostposter, can you explain why you feel the need to sugarcoat the fact that your annoyed at this threat being reposted even though it has nothing to do with you? just curious.
This thread has to do with the video way back when Daniel came back to Jonas's house drunk. I see no reason for it to be here now, and I'm not sugarcoating anything. It is annoying.

Freakish, can you explain why you feel the need to personally attack me constantly?

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:47 pm
by freakish
longlostposter wrote:
freakish wrote:longlostposter, can you explain why you feel the need to sugarcoat the fact that your annoyed at this threat being reposted even though it has nothing to do with you? just curious.
This thread has to do with the video way back when Daniel came back to Jonas's house drunk. I see no reason for it to be here now, and I'm not sugarcoating anything. It is annoying.

Freakish, can you explain why you feel the need to personally attack me constantly?
i would explain it but id rather not get banned from this forum.

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:50 pm
by longlostposter
freakish wrote:
longlostposter wrote:
freakish wrote:longlostposter, can you explain why you feel the need to sugarcoat the fact that your annoyed at this threat being reposted even though it has nothing to do with you? just curious.
This thread has to do with the video way back when Daniel came back to Jonas's house drunk. I see no reason for it to be here now, and I'm not sugarcoating anything. It is annoying.

Freakish, can you explain why you feel the need to personally attack me constantly?
i would explain it but id rather not get banned from this forum.
Good choice. Oh, and thanks for admitting it.

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:52 pm
by freakish
longlostposter wrote:
freakish wrote:
longlostposter wrote:This thread has to do with the video way back when Daniel came back to Jonas's house drunk. I see no reason for it to be here now, and I'm not sugarcoating anything. It is annoying.

Freakish, can you explain why you feel the need to personally attack me constantly?
i would explain it but id rather not get banned from this forum.
Good choice. Oh, and thanks for admitting it.
anytime

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:09 am
by Lurker
Despite the aggressive undertones, that was actually a rather civil exchange. I'm proud of you both.