Page 3 of 3
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:38 pm
by janesalteredstates
If the situation is "no good" why would both Bree and Jonas not understand what it meant? That is pretty straight forward.
Who was it that suggested "know good?" So far that is the more interesting thing I've heard.
It must be some sort of code otherwise they would not be stressing it the way they are.
I agree anniid. It is not a phone number. But there are numbers involved.
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:33 pm
by msbabyblue20
I think Oppy sent the text telling Bree that either her running from them was "no good" or her hiding was "no good" b/c they found her.

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:58 pm
by Nieriel.Manwathiel
i made a similar board on the opaphid forum.
breakinahabit05.... squeeee!

:glomps your avvie:

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:59 am
by nobackspacebutton
I still think 'no good' just means... either 1) the situation Daniel is in, where ever he is..is 'no good'. or 2) using the cell phone is 'no good'...and the message might or might not have been from Daniel.
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:44 am
by varsas2
sorry if this has been thought of, like, 1000 times already..
take a mobile phone. put predictive text on. type 'go home' what comes up? 'in good' (on my nokia) so....i'm thinking he tried to type 'go home' and the predictive text messed it up?
also, to the guy earler, you can send text messages to land lines (in the UK anyway) and they will be received, Tom Baker reads them out over the phone.
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:02 pm
by Sami
varsas2 wrote:sorry if this has been thought of, like, 1000 times already..
take a mobile phone. put predictive text on. type 'go home' what comes up? 'in good' (on my nokia) so....i'm thinking he tried to type 'go home' and the predictive text messed it up?
also, to the guy earler, you can send text messages to land lines (in the UK anyway) and they will be received, Tom Baker reads them out over the phone.
I'm with you.. I think that is the best theory ever!
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:22 pm
by Killthesmiley
Sami wrote:varsas2 wrote:sorry if this has been thought of, like, 1000 times already..
take a mobile phone. put predictive text on. type 'go home' what comes up? 'in good' (on my nokia) so....i'm thinking he tried to type 'go home' and the predictive text messed it up?
also, to the guy earler, you can send text messages to land lines (in the UK anyway) and they will be received, Tom Baker reads them out over the phone.
I'm with you.. I think that is the best theory ever!
but tht makes no sense...
The text message that was recieved was no good. No and In aren't in the same predictive text catagory (keypad wise).
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:37 pm
by XxFEMALExX
i just think it would be AWESOME if jonas was up to no good! cuz it says the whole (i think i lost my fake) thing... i don tknow what that could have to do with anything... but i think theres something more with that
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:12 pm
by Killthesmiley
XxFEMALExX wrote:i just think it would be AWESOME if jonas was up to no good! cuz it says the whole (i think i lost my fake) thing... i don tknow what that could have to do with anything... but i think theres something more with that
He did loose it and we found it
(please see Drop: Yokayo Bowl down in the OpAphid Section)
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:32 pm
by Christie91
I think we can dismiss the theories that:
1)Daniel has gone home because he would have at least warned Bree and Jonas that he had. He knows how much danger Bree is in if she leaves the house due to her fathers death.
2)Daniel is with Tachy. If he is with Tachy, she would have let Daniel ring Bree and at least tell her that hes ok.
So I think the overall conclusion is that Daniel is in trouble because if he wasn't he at least would have had enough time to type a proper message out that they would have been able to decipher.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:46 am
by varsas2
Killthesmiley wrote:Sami wrote:varsas2 wrote:sorry if this has been thought of, like, 1000 times already..
take a mobile phone. put predictive text on. type 'go home' what comes up? 'in good' (on my nokia) so....i'm thinking he tried to type 'go home' and the predictive text messed it up?
also, to the guy earler, you can send text messages to land lines (in the UK anyway) and they will be received, Tom Baker reads them out over the phone.
I'm with you.. I think that is the best theory ever!
but tht makes no sense...
The text message that was recieved was no good. No and In aren't in the same predictive text catagory (keypad wise).
we aren’t worried about if 'in' and 'go' are in the same category (they are on my phone) it's 'no' and 'go' I was commenting on...maybe he was trying to say something else that got mangled (maybe someone with a US phone could look at the possibilities). The message as it is doesn’t make any sense...was he trying to type a phone number?[/quote]
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:58 am
by nobackspacebutton
Perhaps it was whomever is holding Daniel that sent the text message. He was implying its no good or no use to keep calling because he has Daniel and Daniel cannot reply.

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:12 pm
by Killthesmiley
varsas2 wrote:Killthesmiley wrote:Sami wrote:
I'm with you.. I think that is the best theory ever!
but tht makes no sense...
The text message that was recieved was no good. No and In aren't in the same predictive text catagory (keypad wise).
we aren’t worried about if 'in' and 'go' are in the same category (they are on my phone) it's 'no' and 'go' I was commenting on...maybe he was trying to say something else that got mangled (maybe someone with a US phone could look at the possibilities). The message as it is doesn’t make any sense...was he trying to type a phone number?
[/quote]
I AM looking at a North American phone. No and Go aren't in the same catagory.
the only real possibilties are No Good and No Home and No good and On Good and On Home ( i tried it on my phone)