visiting her dad

Lord Balto · Post by **Lord Balto** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:08 am

Some things are secret for a reason.
There are people whose lives are dedicated to keeping them that way.

Unfortunately, most of these "secrets" turn out to be just so much banal claptrap. Does anyone seriously think all these channellers have access to anything but their own subconscious imaginings?

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:17 am

Lord Balto wrote:
Some things are secret for a reason.
There are people whose lives are dedicated to keeping them that way.
Unfortunately, most of these "secrets" turn out to be just so much banal claptrap. Does anyone seriously think all these channellers have access to anything but their own subconscious imaginings?

That would have to depend on whether or not these specific channellers are focusing on 'imaginings' of reality or falseness.

Lord Balto · Post by **Lord Balto** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:31 am

nobackspacebutton wrote:
Lord Balto wrote:
Some things are secret for a reason.
There are people whose lives are dedicated to keeping them that way.
Unfortunately, most of these "secrets" turn out to be just so much banal claptrap. Does anyone seriously think all these channellers have access to anything but their own subconscious imaginings?

That would have to depend on whether or not these specific channellers are focusing on 'imaginings' of reality or falseness.

Like forgeries of oil paintings, looking back on the channellings of those who lived 50 or 100 years ago makes it painfully obvious how influenced they were by the environment of the times, as it becomes just as painfully obvious how art forgers were influenced by the artistic standards and styles of their time. There is not one example of a channeller discovering new information that stood the test of time. They invariably turn out to be at odds with the most basic discoveries of later times.

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:34 am

Lord Balto wrote:
nobackspacebutton wrote:
Lord Balto wrote: Unfortunately, most of these "secrets" turn out to be just so much banal claptrap. Does anyone seriously think all these channellers have access to anything but their own subconscious imaginings?

That would have to depend on whether or not these specific channellers are focusing on 'imaginings' of reality or falseness.
Like forgeries of oil paintings, looking back on the channellings of those who lived 50 or 100 years ago makes it painfully obvious how influenced they were by the environment of the times, as it becomes just as painfully obvious how art forgers were influenced by the artistic standards and styles of their time. There is not one example of a channeller discovering new information that stood the test of time. They invariably turn out to be at odds with the most basic discoveries of later times.

Everythings been done or thought before...what true thought is actually 'original' or new? Everything has always been taken from something else or an assortment of others. This is no new discovery.

Lord Balto · Post by **Lord Balto** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:07 am

nobackspacebutton wrote:
Lord Balto wrote:
nobackspacebutton wrote:
That would have to depend on whether or not these specific channellers are focusing on 'imaginings' of reality or falseness.
Like forgeries of oil paintings, looking back on the channellings of those who lived 50 or 100 years ago makes it painfully obvious how influenced they were by the environment of the times, as it becomes just as painfully obvious how art forgers were influenced by the artistic standards and styles of their time. There is not one example of a channeller discovering new information that stood the test of time. They invariably turn out to be at odds with the most basic discoveries of later times.
Everythings been done or thought before...what true thought is actually 'original' or new? Everything has always been taken from something else or an assortment of others. This is no new discovery.

The tunnel diode.

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:14 pm

Killthesmiley wrote:oooo
i want to be a monkey's agent.

I wanna be not a casual observer anymore! Apparently my dreams are a little less ambitious

I'll make it there one day!

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:17 pm

kristenjane wrote:
Ziola wrote:I don't. They didn't look to forced when they left in that car.

They may not have looked forced but they are in a nice suburban neighborhood. Would you want your neighbors all up in your business if you came screaming out of your house and get the Order all mad at you. No.. I wouldnt either.
haha I said all up in your business.

OH! The thing out brainwashing and responding when a certain word is said is really neat. Think if when you were little your parents did that? Creepy.

haha just noticed that..."all up in your business"--sweeet. I also think that people who have full reverence for the power of the Order (such as Bree's parents) might not even try to fight back or run. Someone made the good point that running, if unsuccessful, could only make the Order more angry. which I suppose raises the stakes for Bree...

breewithcrackers · Post by **breewithcrackers** » Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:44 pm

well there goes my theory....

Taig · Post by **Taig** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:28 pm

I am new so forgive me if this is unkind or out of place...but I find these heavily "nested" quote blocs difficult to follow and extremely repetitive; especially when followed by just a short message afterward.

Am I missing something of value in this?

EternalGoddess · Post by **EternalGoddess** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:32 pm

nobackspacebutton wrote:
Beckers wrote:
nobackspacebutton wrote:
your trying to increases posts, aint ya becka
yeah...so...what's it to ya...This msg board is fun...and I wanna be Thor's Hammer (whine)
lmao I wanna be P Monkeys Agent

I want to be P Monkey's agent too! Why? P. Monkey, and monkey's in general, is/are awesome.

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:38 am

EternalGoddess wrote:
nobackspacebutton wrote:
Beckers wrote: yeah...so...what's it to ya...This msg board is fun...and I wanna be Thor's Hammer (whine)
lmao I wanna be P Monkeys Agent
I want to be P Monkey's agent too! Why? P. Monkey, and monkey's in general, is/are awesome.

Monkey!!

Post by **Broken Kid** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:46 am

Taig wrote:I am new so forgive me if this is unkind or out of place...but I find these heavily "nested" quote blocs difficult to follow and extremely repetitive; especially when followed by just a short message afterward.

Am I missing something of value in this?

That's my biggest forum pet peeve.

Beckers · Post by **Beckers** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:51 am

I don't like it when the quotes are long either. There is usually only a need for it if your responding to something a little further back in the thread or a specific point.

nobackspacebutton · Post by **nobackspacebutton** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:00 am

Beckers wrote:I don't like it when the quotes are long either. There is usually only a need for it if your responding to something a little further back in the thread or a specific point.

I found it rather comical when the quotes get to be a page long...lol. But yes, its only purpose is for responding to someone specifically, like so.