Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:23 pm
I love LG. I don't like Spin Doctors.trainer101 wrote:Didn't move me one way or the other. I HOPING they find a way to make money with this. Why is it you seem to have an anti-LG agenda?
Lonelygirl15
Forum to post messages about Bree and Danielbeast
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/
Are we squelching the creators' creativity?
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3499
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:30 pm
In entertainment like politics the spin doctors are a necessary evil. (Okay, in politics they're just evil)lesbrent wrote:I love LG. I don't like Spin Doctors.trainer101 wrote:Didn't move me one way or the other. I HOPING they find a way to make money with this. Why is it you seem to have an anti-LG agenda?
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:31 pm
JayHank wrote:I was disappointed to see Greg Goodfried quoted in an advertising Web site, ClickZ news, saying that the chat received 350,000 visitors.
Here's the article: ClickZ News
It was pointed out numerous times in this thread and other places that this number was not even remotely accurate. The site did not have 350,000 unique visitors. The video in which the chat was announced had not even been viewed 1/2 that many times -- there was no way 350,000 people knew.
And yet although this number was exposed as inaccurate it was nevertheless presented as part of an advertising pitch? This seems like a flagrant lie, or even fraud. And if you're going to lie, at least know how to back it up.
There's a Web site called Alexa that tracks traffic at Web sites. Alexa exposes 350,000 unique visitors for the complete lie that it is.
Alexa rankings for lonelygirl15.com
Alexa reveals the truth -- that the amount of traffic at the site the day of Breechat was not even double the typical traffic -- and not even close to 350,000 people.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:33 pm
Doesn't Alexa only track users who have the Alexa Toolbar though?Iris2009 wrote:JayHank wrote:I was disappointed to see Greg Goodfried quoted in an advertising Web site, ClickZ news, saying that the chat received 350,000 visitors.
Here's the article: ClickZ News
It was pointed out numerous times in this thread and other places that this number was not even remotely accurate. The site did not have 350,000 unique visitors. The video in which the chat was announced had not even been viewed 1/2 that many times -- there was no way 350,000 people knew.
And yet although this number was exposed as inaccurate it was nevertheless presented as part of an advertising pitch? This seems like a flagrant lie, or even fraud. And if you're going to lie, at least know how to back it up.
There's a Web site called Alexa that tracks traffic at Web sites. Alexa exposes 350,000 unique visitors for the complete lie that it is.
Alexa rankings for lonelygirl15.com
Alexa reveals the truth -- that the amount of traffic at the site the day of Breechat was not even double the typical traffic -- and not even close to 350,000 people.
I'm not arguing for either side, I just don't think that Alexa would be the most accurate way to judge the traffic.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:13 am
Wow... Suffer a little burnout and disappear for a month, just to discover Spacie has moved on in the interim? I was sure that I've missed a lot in the time I've been MIA, but I wasn't expecting that!Broken Kid wrote:We seem to have lost several people, including ones who posted regularly. Remember recently appointed moderator Wintermute? Haven't seen him in ages.
Most leave with no notice. Spacie did explain why she was leaving, at least. It's sad to lose people who were really into it and posted regularly, but it IS always nice to see new fans come on and make their presence felt!
BTW... I'm BAAAACCCKKK... <lol>
'mute
edit... Oh... And I voted "Maybe, but they wanted fan interaction" or whatever that approximates
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:40 am
wintermute wrote:Wow... Suffer a little burnout and disappear for a month, just to discover Spacie has moved on in the interim? I was sure that I've missed a lot in the time I've been MIA, but I wasn't expecting that!
BTW... I'm BAAAACCCKKK... <lol>
'mute
edit... Oh... And I voted "Maybe, but they wanted fan interaction" or whatever that approximates
Is it really you, 'mute? *rubs eyes*Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:51 pm
Yup... It's me. You're not dreamingFlautapantera wrote:
'mute