Page 3 of 9
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:15 pm
by Ziola
Since, by saying we are pure and we've made a choice, maybe the obvious enemy is Daniel? And its obvious that he's made many mistakes in his actions and lovingly recorded all of them for us.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:18 pm
by PiIsYourFfriend
Destrin41016 wrote:you know wat i was thinking...maybe the number was wrong...maybe when she says "Mistakes are the portals of discovery. Alas, never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." means that we made amistake...and that shes not gonnalet us know...but that implys we are the enemy and choosing sides is pointless...so...i guess this doesnt make sense...anyone try to call the number backwards?
well, the number coould have been eath 28 or 29 in one part, and we all went with 28. if you are right, maybe both numbers where egidtered, but two NINE is the right one.
then again, we are doing pretty good with the number we called.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:19 pm
by tiltingwindward
I'm not sure that we're pure. We may have found the purity within etc., but I think the only "pure" being in this story is Bree--after all, she went through an extensive ceremony to purify herself.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:20 pm
by prep him
the number was clearly
28, based on this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maàt
I am not sure what they were looking at with the 28 vs. 29 controversy - the line is wrong.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:25 pm
by Ziola
tiltingwindward wrote:I'm not sure that we're pure. We may have found the purity within etc., but I think the only "pure" being in this story is Bree--after all, she went through an extensive ceremony to purify herself.
Part of me thinks that the ceremony never really got completed due to Daniel showing up. Maybe thats why, Lucy is still around.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:27 pm
by Ziola
has anyone tried the number using 29 instead of the 28?
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:28 pm
by PiIsYourFfriend
lol, ok. so. maybe we realy do just have to wait for the callback. the end of the message did say wait. thats what i'm doing untill someone comes up with soething else to do.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:31 pm
by Luv2Luvem
Ziola wrote:has anyone tried the number using 29 instead of the 28?
29 doesn't go with the video.
But I just called it just in case and it was a "private voice mailbox" with a standard recorded message "thank you for calling the private voice mailbox blah blah" No information on who it was for or anything.
edit sp.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:31 pm
by tiltingwindward
Then while we're waiting...
"The truly worthy should ask themselves if they understand what is being asked of them."
Truly worthy? Calling all truly worthy! Do you understand? Care to share?
(Because I, for one, don't think it's even been hinted what's being asked.)
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:34 pm
by PiIsYourFfriend
i hope we are being asked to go back to sleep untill midnight, beause i'm doing tht weather it's being asked of me or not.
when do you guys think she might call back?
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:35 pm
by prep him
screw waiting - new message:
To those who have proven themselves worthy:
Find instruction within the message. Only then will you be prepared.
The first step toward any solution? The A in APHID, of course.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:36 pm
by tigerlilylynn
prep him wrote:the number was clearly
28, based on this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maàt
I am not sure what they were looking at with the 28 vs. 29 controversy - the line is wrong.
That'd be my fault. When I first posted I was working off of
http://www.perankhgroup.com/42%20commandments.htm
Which didn't have the clearer interpretations
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:37 pm
by prep him
Ahhh, ok - that makes sense.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:45 pm
by PiIsYourFfriend
a could mean many things, stuf we need to remove, stuff we need to add. pholocifers whos names start with a. there are many more as well.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:49 pm
by taiya
There's a new message. We need to figure out what the A in Aphid is.