Lonelygirl15

longlostposter wrote:

Chelseyrl wrote:Does anyone know a way that I could just get the audio for this without having to record it through my speakers with a shit microphone?

There's a program that does it, but other than that I don't know.

If you're referring to Audacity, I have that...

Is it helping?

I don't do this kind of stuff, and I don't know anything about it.

No, I opened up Uncle Dan.mov and all I hear is a squirrel on crack...

this was a good video, even though i hate to say it though.......i kind of miss bree! what could her and tachy be up to in their forest ninja compund?

immortal1 wrote:

longlostposter wrote:I agree with everything you've said here, especially the A to C part. Does it seem like we were missing a video inbetween the cabin and Aunt Alex's? You betcha, and I've chosen to just ignore it; but I can understand if you can't. However, it does make sense if Jonas is Order, and this was a plan..

I understand sometimes you set things up so that later they are available to go back to, like when Jonas used the cell to call ahead to the cabin. If you don't go back it becomes a red herring but I also think you can go to that well too many times.

Yep, it kind of becomes a catch-all crutch, and it really stinks to high heaven after a while.

immortal1 wrote:I think I'm just feeling overwhelmed with the arrival of so many new characters. I hope they don't all make vids. It would be nice if one of two of them caught on.

Let's hope we don't see a new outbreak of 15 Claudia's, that would not be good, to say the least. If the Creators can manage to keep the speculation down about the non-canons, by sending non-canon character posts immediately into the thread for that, then they may be able to control it. But, yeah, a couple of new canon characters would be nice.

longlostposter wrote:

immortal1 wrote:I know you are missing Bree. Sorry to say, I am not. I'm not sure what you wish for, though...do you want to go back to the days in her bedroom? Or something inbetween what is going on now, and that?

No, not at all. I think you do have to stay true to the heart of the character. In Training Hard, Bree said "So, I brought along an old friend. I haven't really had much time to hang out with him lately, so, yeah. And to be honest, I think I'm a little old to be playing with stuffed toys. Sad but true." I would have preferred she said, "So, I brought along an old friend. No not to talk- when I look at him it I remember how things used to be. It takes me to a safe place in my mind and reminds me that the Order has taken all that away from me." You do that and no longer is PMonkey and imaginary friend or toy, it becomes a symbol. Same thing with Proving Science Wrong. Bree is supposed to have a scientific mind she could use those skills to help herself. It obviously wouldn't be as lighthearted, on the contrary more serious and probably more of Proving Science Right. In a way keeping things like these that many feel are at the heart of the character but sort of growing them with her not only acknowledges their significance but in a way pays homage to them instead of just tossing them away or leaving them behind. Again IMO it's providing the B between the A and C of her character development.

Yes, of all the things that have suffered because of the conflict between the ARG and the videos themselves, Bree's character has suffered the most. I hate it that I don't like her anymore. However, I will give her another chance. Creators, let's have a strong confidant Bree that is in harmony with the characteristics of the earlier sheltered Bree. I know you can do it.

And you are right. They missed some golden opportunities to forge a bridge between what Bree must become, and what she was and is. The writing could definately be improved on all fronts.

immortal1 wrote:I just read where some are speculating this is all introducing the Parallax aspect of the ARG. In one way I was relieved because it explains some of these plot holes. When the ARG elements are in the forefront, story telling seems to take a backseat. On the other hand, I feel-here we go again. This show is supposed to offer interactivity to fans other than the ones playing the ARG.

If they are going to intertwine them again, I'm hoping they've learned from the mess that was made last time. I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt; I think it can be done. With this being so experimental, there were bound to be some stumblingblocks and pitfalls that weren't foreseen. But one thing I sure don't want to see is numerous puzzle-solving vids. That is not acceptable, IMO.

immortal1 wrote:I have a lot personally invested in Dr. Immant. I feel like his story deserves to be told and I think I can bring some interesting things to the table. I also am involved and support other fans who make vids so I'll be around. I appreciate the sentiment-At the end of the day we all want the same things. Sometimes I get frustrated and just need to blow off steam.

I hope you got it off your chest. Do you think the Creators are going to bring Dr. Immant into it? Oh, nevermind, you couldn't tell me if they were...lol.

I think they've learned from their mistakes, and hopefully it will work better this time. Anyway, I'm glad you're staying.

Chelseyrl wrote:No, I opened up Uncle Dan.mov and all I hear is a squirrel on crack...

lol

fsk282 wrote:this was a good video, even though i hate to say it though.......i kind of miss bree! what could her and tachy be up to in their forest ninja compund?

I just hope she comes badk a new improved Bree that makes sense.

I'm excited for Alex and Bree to meet. In Parallax, they were saying that if Alex is an Orderite, that could mean trouble for poor Bree.

Chelseyrl wrote:I'm excited for Alex and Bree to meet. In Parallax, they were saying that if Alex is an Orderite, that could mean trouble for poor Bree.

Well, one thing I definate think is resolved, is that we won't be lagging along like we used to. I think we're going to be seeing some things busting loose <crosses fingers>.

A showdown between Alex and Bree (if it happens), would require a much stronger Bree, IMO; and I'm hoping that's what we will get.

immortal1 wrote:
But if each one of these new characters starts posting their melodrama this can quickly degenerate into a Noho-WeHo-here a ho- there a ho-everywhere a ho ho-girls.

If this turns into that, I'm going to be outta here lmao. (and I hope I'm not the only one that knows what you're talking about.

(edited the quote to make it shorter)

ShardinsKitten wrote:

immortal1 wrote:
But if each one of these new characters starts posting their melodrama this can quickly degenerate into a Noho-WeHo-here a ho- there a ho-everywhere a ho ho-girls.

If this turns into that, I'm going to be outta here lmao. (and I hope I'm not the only one that knows what you're talking about.

(edited the quote to make it shorter)

Well, as I told immortal, if hey keep a tight reign on it, it could work.

Anyway, I'm gonna hit the sack, Night SiK, and Chel, if you are here. See those who are here tomorrow, tomorrow. Blessed dreams all.

alot of people have been saying this video proves jonas isnt gay but isnt it weird that blonde haired guy compliments jonas...then jonas leaves and blonde haired guy follows...cut to the next scene and jonas is in the corner wiping him mouth hmmm i dunnooooo lol or maybe im just a pervert

legpedia is updated!!!! here's what the transcriber thinks Carl said:

Carl: --party, so you could talk to Alex, so you could get in her nephew's file? (It is unclear exactly what he says here.)

kejpi wrote:legpedia is updated!!!! here's what the transcriber thinks Carl said:

Carl: --party, so you could talk to Alex, so you could get in her nephew's file? (It is unclear exactly what he says here.)

Hate to disagree with LGPedia...and other fine minds on the forum... but he definately says drunk. It's really obvious to me.

My question is, if he says drunk (if since we don't have creator confirmation)...why???

I'm almost sure he said "phone number" not file....I guess I'll have to give it another listen.

Edit to say that I think I might be confusing two different parts of the video, so I'm going back to have another look.