Page 11 of 18
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:50 pm
by SivartAlappes
The lines with the most disagreement:
This portion still functions, but you cannot block/blend it because the complimenatary strand of RNA won't combine
Q.E.D.: Strand will bind to ribozyme and occlude its activity/copy
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:51 pm
by tazman2087
I think its copy, because replicate makes the most sense there and copy is the only c word that would be a synonym.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:51 pm
by emerrs11
i'm glad to know i got some of the same answers as other people... i didn't do very good but ah welll....
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:52 pm
by kellylen
tazman2087 wrote:kellylen
see i was on track with replicate.
lololol yeah i see
and its copy guys.
like i said. things in science having to do with biochemistry and genetics DO NOT BLEND!
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:52 pm
by Sheqinah
Samara wrote:Well, here's where I am right now...
I'll go back and add some of what you guys have:
the word regular under Given Facts 2) does not fit
I sound like OJ's lawyer
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:53 pm
by Samara
Well, I'm taking a different approach to most of you I think. I was doing it purely visually in photoshop and filling it in from there. I know nothing of this stuff.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:55 pm
by emerrs11
instead of regular maybe repetitive?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:55 pm
by Samara
the word regular under Given Facts 2) does not fit
Yeah, that's why I'm not so sure that's the word that belongs there. I'm still working on it.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:55 pm
by SivartAlappes
kellylen wrote:
like i said. things in science having to do with biochemistry and genetics DO NOT BLEND!
ok, fine, but I don't think its "block" either... because if the RNA strand won't combine, it's already BEING blocked! Therefore, having the word "block" makes that particular sentence disagree with itself!
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:56 pm
by emerrs11
Samara wrote:Well, I'm taking a different approach to most of you I think. I was doing it purely visually in photoshop and filling it in from there. I know nothing of this stuff.
that's what i was doing too. works the best when you zoom in
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:56 pm
by Aponi
kellylen wrote:tazman2087 wrote:kellylen
see i was on track with replicate.
lololol yeah i see
and its copy guys.
like i said. things in science having to do with biochemistry and genetics DO NOT BLEND!
I am back! I needed food.
I agree with copy, it makes sense.
But it's NOT block.
you cannot block it because the complimenatary strand of RNA won't combine?
If it won't combine it's already being blocked. So 'you' don't need to block it.
Maybe its something else that begins with bl?
I'm just saying, block makes no sense in context.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:57 pm
by a_little_nachtmusik
emerrs11 wrote:the ____________ reference points i thought could be retrivial
It's Bree Solution Reverence Points, I'm pretty sure.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:58 pm
by emerrs11
Samara wrote:the word regular under Given Facts 2) does not fit
Yeah, that's why I'm not so sure that's the word that belongs there. I'm still working on it.
THE WORD IS REPETITIVE!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:58 pm
by SivartAlappes
Samara wrote:Well, I'm taking a different approach to most of you I think. I was doing it purely visually in photoshop and filling it in from there. I know nothing of this stuff.
I don't know this stuff either... AND I don't even HAVE photoshop! I was going visually from what Spencer posted on page 1.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:58 pm
by kellylen
change combine to copy guys and it makes a lot more sense.
you are arguing about osmething i changed a half hour to hour ago XD