Bree, the virgin

storyteller · Post by **storyteller** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:35 pm

c_anderson wrote:To clarify, the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996, which was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2002, made works like Romeo & Juliet illegal.

http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZO.html

If it was overturned, why does it matter?

Just curious.

Post by **wintermute** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:41 pm

jill2009 wrote:Well, Daniel having sex with Bree would be statutory rape.

In many places, as long as they are within 2 years of age, statutory rape would not apply...

'mute