Page 2 of 3

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:28 pm
by Lurker
mincartaugh wrote:Still haven't managed to convince me of the Daniel thing. Why would you see Daniel in the bathroom if he's behind the camera!
Why would the camera be at exactly the same elevation and angle (above his head and pointing diagonally down) if he's behind the camera?

And why wouldn't Bree ever look at him while they ran around outside, when all the camera seems to be doing is looking at her?

And why would he try running right into her?

And why would she not so much as say his name and check to see if he was alive when he got shot?

I think there's a lot more questions that go against the notion.

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:39 pm
by raigne
Yes, Tach and Brother cannot see these videos, but we know that BD&J were in contact with them. We also know that at least one of them can pilot a helicopter. We saw helicopters in the kidnapping video. The last public video posted is BD&J being chased. That would at least have alerted Tachyon and Brother that they were in trouble, even if the kids didn't contact them afterward. Doesn't it seem a little odd that they'd just be wandering around a gas station after a close call like that? They could even have been waiting for one or the other to pick them up.

My mind's not closed to other possibilities. I love new characters, and it's a great time to introduce one, but logically, brother and tachyon make the most sense.

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:21 pm
by mincartaugh
Lurker

The camera hadn't been taken down from its fixed position yet. That's what Daniel is doing behind the camera.

There are a lot of times when the camera is off. Who is to say what did and did not happen in those times?

Why would she look at him? It would slow her down?

He never tries to run right into her.

If someone were shooting at me and hit the person right next to me, I certainly wouldn't stop to let them get better aim!

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:35 pm
by Lurker
After this, I'll let the matter drop until we get confirmation one way or the other, but there's one thing I want to ask, just to be sure I'm reading you right:
mincartaugh wrote:If someone were shooting at me and hit the person right next to me, I certainly wouldn't stop to let them get better aim!
"The person" right next to Bree was Daniel according to your argument. Not a villain that she wouldn't care about, and not even a random stranger that she may have just met. Daniel. Her best friend. The guy she's known for three years, who she cares for a great deal, who has been there for her through all kinds of crap, and who is only in this situation because he wanted to protect her.

But you're saying she ran off without even checking to see if he was alive...? That she didn't call out his name when he got hit? That she was booking it on out of there before his body even hit the ground (we see Bree running off as the camera is going down)?

I have no further questions.

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:46 pm
by mincartaugh
Damn! Appeal to my sense of the romantic! That is truly not playing fair. OK, guys. Against my better judgment I'll go along with you. I still want answers for the inexplicable stuff I've mentioned, but...

OK. It's not Daniel.

(he goes shuffling away from the computer shaking his head and muttering, "Dang! Going weak kneed at my age! ...over some tear jerker visual. May as well shoot me now!")

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:50 pm
by Lurker
You serious? Did I just change your mind with that appeal?

Well... okay. Let's just hope I'm right. If she really did do that, then I'll hope the sniper gets her next time.

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:54 pm
by Jo_16_2
mincartaugh wrote: OK. It's not Daniel.
\o/
lurker, you're my hero, i've been trying to prove to mincartaugh that the one shot wasnt daniel ALL DAY LONG! but you did it :lol: :lol:

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:55 pm
by mincartaugh
Yup! You got me! I can't see Bree doing something that practical. She's barely 17. Kids don't have more than a thimble full of wisdom at that age.

Or that's the logic I'm putting to my abhorrent behavior! :wink:

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:55 am
by RoseCrowley
The Vegas Video was the last one that was not a private transmission.....so Brother/Tachy could of seen that Op was chasing them, hence our team could of tracked BJD...

Also, If BJD does a private transmission, can tachy/bro see it since they are on their side...? Sorry if that sounds stupid but I was just curious...

Image

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:08 am
by giddeanx
RoseCrowley wrote:The Vegas Video was the last one that was not a private transmission.....so Brother/Tachy could of seen that Op was chasing them, hence our team could of tracked BJD...

Also, If BJD does a private transmission, can tachy/bro see it since they are on their side...? Sorry if that sounds stupid but I was just curious...

Image
Yes, I think thats the plan. I also thought they said things about private videos pointed at certain characters instead of factions.

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:18 am
by sukey
I say, Daniel momentarily disabled the surveillance camera that was on him and he and Bree escaped.

A watcher (or whomever) chased Bree while filming until jumping her by the bush.

She, in turn, used her newly gained Tachyon skillz and whipped his butt, took his camera and posted the movie later.

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:25 am
by Jo_16_2
...and how would she post it in the order's private channel?

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:29 am
by RoseCrowley
Once the person chasing Bree was hit, she ran away...the person in black took the camera.

I don't think she could of posted the film, because of the other camera filming daniel (we don't know if that is indeed the same camera, or if there are multipule cameras??).

I don't doubt her ninja skills she has gotten from Tachy though!

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:51 am
by Lunafox
This post doesn't prove that tachy and/or brother didn't have anything to do with this most recent video.

While I agree that the creators would not lie about *who* posted a video. That is the one constant truth really in this 'private transmission' thing atleast this early in anyway. I don't think that that proves anything other than the order posted this video.

Those feet could have belonged to someone else in the order.

Just because tach or bro did the killing doesn't mean they had to post the video.

Also Daniel did not get shot and was not holding the cammera.

I'm not saying i KNOW they did it (though i speculate this is true) I am just saying it's possible.

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:14 pm
by RoseCrowley
What if it was "Bree's dad"?