How many old peole will now tune in to see that the Caertoon Network is not "Just for Kids"???
This could be the end of Adult Swim as we know uit people!

Moderators: Moderators, Ambassadors
Hey, don't peg all Bostonians in as morons. Basically, those who overreacted were morons, the police, after the confirmed these "devices" weren't bombs, were morons, and the government was mornic for not accepting that it was Turner Broadcasting's doing when the contacted them to tell them as much.AutoPilate wrote:You want to know how frigging moronic Bostonians are? These devices have been in place for two to three weeks in ten cities: Boston; New York; Los Angeles; Chicago; Atlanta; Seattle; Portland, Ore.; Austin, Texas; San Francisco; and Philadelphia. Now the governor of Massachussetts, to cover up the embarrassment of looking like a complete drooling idiot with the city's overreacting, says "It's a hoax - and it's not funny". Whatever, Gov. Patrick. We didn't see this kind of paranoia take hold of those nine other cities, and one of those nine was New York!
Next, let’s all get out our dictionary and look up “hoax”, shall we? Because while “War of the Worlds” was a hoax, this was not. There was no subterfuge involved, and no effort made to convince people that these devices were bombs. If I see a scary looking tree out my bedroom window, think it’s a monster, and then discover upon closer inspection that it isn’t, it doesn’t mean the tree has perpetrated a hoax against me. What it means is that for a moment I took leave of my senses. And just because I’m embarrassed about it doesn’t give me the right to go cut down the tree.
It's quite alright. It's a bit of an expected reaction, but I just wanted to clear it up that not all Bostonians are clueless, stuffy, paranoid people.AutoPilate wrote:I apologise for my generalisation. I must possess one of these shirts!
This is just about the center of the argument now over here for anyone who actually has any sense. Lots of people are wondering why it's being referred to as a hoax. If you ask me, the government is trying to cover their shame by using this word instead of accepting responsibility that they overreacted after discovering the first one wasn't a bomb.AutoPilate wrote:
http://weeklydig.com/blog/articles/terror_outrage
Next, let’s all get out our dictionary and look up “hoax”, shall we? Because while “War of the Worlds” was a hoax, this was not. There was no subterfuge involved, and no effort made to convince people that these devices were bombs. If I see a scary looking tree out my bedroom window, think it’s a monster, and then discover upon closer inspection that it isn’t, it doesn’t mean the tree has perpetrated a hoax against me. What it means is that for a moment I took leave of my senses. And just because I’m embarrassed about it doesn’t give me the right to go cut down the tree.
Because we're chasing around terrorists every day around here? That's news to me!Scaring an entire region, tying up the T and major roadway, and forcing first responders to spend 12 hours chasing down trinkets instead of terrorists is marketing run amok. –Rep. Ed Markey
If it's any consolation, I'll always remember it for the huge crush I used to have on Shelley Long.autumneternal wrote:Oh, and I love how Boston is trying to make the fact that two of the hijacked planes left from here on 9/11 our claim to fame now. Yeah...that's what we want to be remembered for!