Page 2 of 7
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:35 pm
by sskylaarr
obediance is the biggy.
followed by 'purity' i'd assume, since her mother stressed it.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:36 pm
by iamcool
Luv2Skydive wrote:Maybe because she didn't rebel as a teenager....they thought she would be fully cooperative? Oh, I found this at a Stargate website and found it kinda weird:
"Urrone: A particular class of children, chosen at birth to be the means through which the population acquires new knowledge. Each child is injected with millions of nanites -- called nanoprocessors on Orban -- in infancy, before the neural pathways are set. Each child is set on a particular course of study, to become an expert in that subject. They require little sleep, and apparently do nothing but study. At puberty (roughly -- it's not clear whether it's puberty per se, or the child's 12th birthday), the child reaches the "time of Averium and his or her nanites are harvested and distributed to the rest of the population, who then have all the knowledge the child acquired. The Urrone child is simple-minded (and pre-verbal) after that, since the nanites effectively took the place of their own synapses, which thus never developed.
u have got it!
seriously i think thats it!
great work!!!
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:38 pm
by Ziola
What I don't understand is how you can distinguish one infant from another. It has to be based on 1 of 2 things...
-appearance
-genetics (the importance of their birth parents)
At least, thats how I see it. Cuz all babies pretty much do the same things...eat, sleep, pee, poop and cry...a lot
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:38 pm
by Killthesmiley
I agree...
it partial has to be appearance.
think about he brithmark on her back. It resembles the watcher symbol
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:50 pm
by JustAnotherLonelyGirl.
I think it has to be something physical too. And I think Gemma was another stolen baby. So what's different about the two of them?
I thought of maybe eyes. The eye is a huge symbol in the Order, and Op and Tach vids are always showing images of eyes. Gemma has creepy blue eyes. Bree's are brown. Could that mean anything?
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:18 pm
by robtomorrow
Maybe it's boob size, that would fit in with the puberty thing.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:19 pm
by Luv2Skydive
robtomorrow wrote:Maybe it's boob size, that would fit in with the puberty thing.
Yeah.....trust, me, it's the boobs.
They hold the key.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:21 pm
by Luv2Skydive
[quote="iamcool"
u have got it!
seriously i think thats it!
great work!!!
[/quote]
Maybe she's the Fifth Element....ever see that movie with Bruce Willis? I'm actually watching it right now....oddly enough.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:29 pm
by spaciegirlreturn
Luv2Skydive wrote:robtomorrow wrote:Maybe it's boob size, that would fit in with the puberty thing.
Yeah.....trust, me, it's the boobs.
They hold the key.
If I have to pick my key out of your bra one more time..I swear..
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:36 pm
by Taig
Since ALL babies basically look like Winston Churchill, I don't know how they could figure it out either
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:39 pm
by Luv2Skydive
spaciegirlreturn wrote:Luv2Skydive wrote:robtomorrow wrote:Maybe it's boob size, that would fit in with the puberty thing.
Yeah.....trust, me, it's the boobs.
They hold the key.
If I have to pick my key out of your bra one more time..I swear..
LMAO....as I was typing that I KNEW you wouldn't let it slip by....of course, mine don't let anything slip by! I was also reminded of my 82-year-old grandma that still stuffs everything from her tissues to her cigarettes and lighters in her bra....it's like another friggin' pocket to her!
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:44 pm
by spaciegirlreturn
My grandma did that too..it was so embarassing when I was a kid. We'd be out somewhere and she'd have to pay for something and she'd go digging around in her ginormous bra for wadded up money to pay with.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:47 pm
by Luv2Skydive
Ziola wrote:What I don't understand is how you can distinguish one infant from another. It has to be based on 1 of 2 things...
-appearance
-genetics (the importance of their birth parents)
At least, thats how I see it. Cuz all babies pretty much do the same things...eat, sleep, pee, poop and cry...a lot
Here is something the Illiminati do to choose the babies:
Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS)
The NBAS will look at
a. the ability to shut out disturbing stimuli,
b. responsiveness to auditory & visual stimuli,
c. muscle tone & motor skills,
d. irritability,
e. capacity to cuddle,
f. skin color,
g. reflexes. Every part of the preemie’s body will be violated.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:51 pm
by spaciegirlreturn
mmm...violating preemies..that is delightful
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:55 pm
by cup o' noodles
Luv2Skydive wrote:Here is something the Illiminati do to choose the babies:
Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS)
The NBAS will look at
a. the ability to shut out disturbing stimuli,
b. responsiveness to auditory & visual stimuli,
c. muscle tone & motor skills,
d. irritability,
e. capacity to cuddle,
f. skin color,
g. reflexes. Every part of the preemie’s body will be violated.
Oh dear god.