Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:25 am
by Killthesmiley
you know what these videos are edited with the same flair as LG15 and OpAphid...where's voyboy when i need him...
it has the same style cuts and pastes.
i wouldn't be moving this so fast romy...i think these videos are keys.
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:37 am
by Killthesmiley
sorry to dbl post but LovinSam's third video is interesting....just note it....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2513yaz36lc
it gets interesting
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:54 am
by covedweller
Yeah, too much about it makes it scream not OpAphid or Tachyon related.
It's interesting and complex but doesn't fit what should be the logical next move from either side of the story arc we're in.
And let's not further confuse all the newcomers who post in Concers/Complaints every couple of days talking about how hard the ARG is to follow.
Sure a mod will be along soon enough to move it (until it's proven otherwise related).
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:09 am
by deagol
Umm, no real argument, just an observation from scanning the article for elementary particles and not finding any tachyons mentioned, but the quote allows for superluminal particles which is what a tachyon is.
I don't see anything in the wiki article that contradicts Feynman's Diagrams explanation elsewhere.
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:12 am
by Killthesmiley
covedweller wrote:Yeah, too much about it makes it scream not OpAphid or Tachyon related.
It's interesting and complex but doesn't fit what should be the logical next move from either side of the story arc we're in.
And let's not further confuse all the newcomers who post in Concers/Complaints every couple of days talking about how hard the ARG is to follow.
Sure a mod will be along soon enough to move it (until it's proven otherwise related).
you know what that is a good point
i think ts related somehow to the series, but maybe not .
i like to jump the gun.
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:36 am
by romanceismusic
covedweller wrote:Yeah, too much about it makes it scream not OpAphid or Tachyon related.
It's interesting and complex but doesn't fit what should be the logical next move from either side of the story arc we're in.
And let's not further confuse all the newcomers who post in Concers/Complaints every couple of days talking about how hard the ARG is to follow.
Sure a mod will be along soon enough to move it (until it's proven otherwise related).
*SIGH* does no one read what I write?
ONE MORE TIME:
romanceismusic wrote:I WANT TO NOTE! THIS IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH OPAPHID THAT I KNOW OF! WE WILL BE MOVING THIS THREAD SHORTLY!
I just thought that maybe someone had found something and it was worth investigating. if anything, i had fun with it, and it entertained me for a good 4 hours.
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:59 am
by Killthesmiley
i love you romy
Re: quantum hippy conspriacy theory
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:22 pm
by commonjoe
Ruberic wrote:commonjoe wrote:Sorry for double posting (I posted this in the videos thread by accident) but I was wondering if the favourite in the lonelygirl15 revver account is relevant. It was a user response to one of DBs, but thecreators have linked to it:
http://one.revver.com/collections/show/14481
My apologies if this was brought up previously and I missed it.
Ok guys...we really need to take a very close look at this video. Honestly.
This guy is reading from a paper, and is quick to point out several key things. Images on the car, paper through the window...etc.
Also, Commonjoe suddenly logs on and drops us this hint...hmm
...
Thanks for the thought, but i'm not part of the show. I just did a bit of wandering and found that link. I don't know what it's all about, but figured if it was a lead it should be followed by someone with a bit more experience.
Hope it wasn't a wild goose chase.
Re: quantum hippy conspriacy theory
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:37 pm
by romanceismusic
commonjoe wrote:Thanks for the thought, but i'm not part of the show. I just did a bit of wandering and found that link. I don't know what it's all about, but figured if it was a lead it should be followed by someone with a bit more experience.
Hope it wasn't a wild goose chase.
like i said before...it entertained me for a while. and im still going to look into it. All the stuff about the Feynman Days really interests me. because if you check the link at the bottom of my massive post on the first page, the actual Feynman website says something along the lines of:
Feynman days does not exist and was made up for the LG15 series.
or something like that. anyway, if ya'll are bored and want to help, please do ^_^
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:10 pm
by lookyz
I think it could be op related on the complex levels that the "game" typically wanders to (ie Romanceismusic's hard work)
But could this be that this is as simple as Bree's secret sign to her dad?
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:22 pm
by romanceismusic
im most positive it isnt op related... BUT im not convinced it isnt somehow LG15 related/important
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:47 am
by bethy
romy's right....
according to the "official" site:
Sunday September 17 2006
by Feynman.com Staff
Feynman Days Festival? News To Us...
Recently we've been asked about Feynman Days or the Feynman Days Festival. To the best of our knowledge, there is no such thing. The Festival is fictitious and was apparently created for the lonelygirl15 YouTube video series. The images with Feynman's van were taken when the van was parked at Caltech for an event related to the stamp honoring Richard Feynman.
Also, the guy refers to Maria Muldaur "in the background".. here's her website:
http://www.mariamuldaur.com/
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:29 pm
by ambriel
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2513yaz36lc
in this video something caught my attention. He talks about SETI but he says SETA - substitutin intelligence for atrifacts where the on screen text clearly says SETI not SETA. CLue maybe? No idea
EDIT
even more intriquing is this guy who claims he went to Feynman Days
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=CrescentFan1
he logged in and posted a vid then never logged in again it seems.
Comments are also from the jinro guy and Lovinsam
i smell something sneeky
okay bear with me i just keep editing this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IK9bdeSSO7Y
this video is SUPER strange. Emphasizing what Mike says whic is backwords. The stuff he says backwords is "Well Feynman Days doesnt really exist does it?"
EDIT AGAIN I really need to stop finding more clues....
He emphasizes what mike says wrong in soo many ways. In the comment to the video by CrescentFan1 The Jinro guy says "RIGHT in too many ways" so is this the clue to lead us to jinro? I'm so confused haha!
The description is also very odd.