Rather hard to make that jump about the angle of the eyes. The camera angle has to be taken into account, its sideways, which can make the big set of eyes look slightly different. And we dont get a real good look at the small thing. Plus it could just be a varient of the bigger one.nobackspacebutton wrote:
as for the pictures in the picture...
if you didn't notice, the eyes in the movie poster are pointing to the right and the other one...the eyes are looking straight.
Nikki Bower
Moderator: Moderators
- ElectricEye
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:33 pm
- Location: Red Sox Nation
- Contact:
- breeislonely
- Casual Observer
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:48 pm
if you watch closely and keep pausing during the fast show of the posters you'll see that it's flyers or a picture of some sort thrown into the bottom of the the big glass poster case, it lookes like each row of posters are all in one glass case, i don't know why they'd be in there randomly, that seems pointless and messy for the theater to do, the only thing i can think is that the creaters ask if they could place them inside for the stories sake, i'd love to get nikki's take on all of this and see if she noticed them behind her, however if they were placed there she'd have to ignore us for the stories sake wouldn't she?
- breeislonely
- Casual Observer
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:48 pm
- watchingall
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:31 pm
i dno, she just rubs me the wrong was, i dont hate her or anything ... i jus dont really like herwatchingall wrote:any reason? Is it her "character"? her videos? do you think shes part of the order? hehe just curious.iamcool wrote:me 3
i dont like her
my name is josh, not iamcool or iam or cool
cooltron5000 is also accepted
My lawyers told me to edit the content of this signature so i didn't get sued
Me and Oobles are 'TWAT's - 'The Worldwide Association of Threadjacking'
cooltron5000 is also accepted
My lawyers told me to edit the content of this signature so i didn't get sued
Me and Oobles are 'TWAT's - 'The Worldwide Association of Threadjacking'

- watchingall
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:31 pm
Fair enough! I admit the first video she really annoyed me (sorry Nikki!) but as each one comes out I like her more and more. The last one especially.iamcool wrote:i dno, she just rubs me the wrong was, i dont hate her or anything ... i jus dont really like herwatchingall wrote:any reason? Is it her "character"? her videos? do you think shes part of the order? hehe just curious.iamcool wrote:me 3
i dont like her
- nobackspacebutton
- The Order of Denderah
- Posts: 5301
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:56 pm
- Location: High Heels and Stockings
- Contact:
- nobackspacebutton
- The Order of Denderah
- Posts: 5301
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:56 pm
- Location: High Heels and Stockings
- Contact:
- watchingall
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:31 pm
Neat, for those of us who cant follow every single story line... which eyes belong to which video? Its hard to compare because of the angle. The bottom ones look a lot lighter (but theres always coloured contacts!) I dont think they are the same just from those two shots, but extremely similar. To me the eye shape is different. The bottom one looks more almond shape than the other. Then again like I said, the angles make it difficult.nobackspacebutton wrote:Here's a picture of the eyes in question:
Thanks for posting that!
Also I didnt notice Gemma subed to Nikki. It could just be that Gemma is trying to help Bree and watches everything related to Bree. Then again, Bree doesnt seem to have noticed Nikki.
This starts to hurt my head afterawhile!

Last edited by watchingall on Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
the top ones tachyon (she has hot eyes)watchingall wrote:Neat, for those of us who cant follow every single story line... which eyes belong to which video? Its hard to compare because of the angle. The bottom ones look a lot lighter (but theres always coloured contacts!) I dont think they are the same just from those two shots, but extremely similar. To me the eye shape is different. The bottom one looks more almond shape than the other. Then again like I said, the angles make it difficult.nobackspacebutton wrote:Here's a picture of the eyes in question:
Thanks for posting that!
and i think the bottoms bree, right?
my name is josh, not iamcool or iam or cool
cooltron5000 is also accepted
My lawyers told me to edit the content of this signature so i didn't get sued
Me and Oobles are 'TWAT's - 'The Worldwide Association of Threadjacking'
cooltron5000 is also accepted
My lawyers told me to edit the content of this signature so i didn't get sued
Me and Oobles are 'TWAT's - 'The Worldwide Association of Threadjacking'

- watchingall
- Lonely Fan
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:31 pm
Josh, right? thanks! she does have pretty eyes. Im not sure about the bottom, cant tell, im sure someone can.iamcool wrote:the top ones tachyon (she has hot eyes)watchingall wrote:Neat, for those of us who cant follow every single story line... which eyes belong to which video? Its hard to compare because of the angle. The bottom ones look a lot lighter (but theres always coloured contacts!) I dont think they are the same just from those two shots, but extremely similar. To me the eye shape is different. The bottom one looks more almond shape than the other. Then again like I said, the angles make it difficult.nobackspacebutton wrote:Here's a picture of the eyes in question:
Thanks for posting that!
and i think the bottoms bree, right?