Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:47 am
Yes. But then no one would ever read one of my posts again...AutoPilate wrote:Now, isn't that much better than having to read some of the drivel here?

'mute
Forum to post messages about Bree and Danielbeast
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/
https://lg15.cassieiswatching.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2183
Yes. But then no one would ever read one of my posts again...AutoPilate wrote:Now, isn't that much better than having to read some of the drivel here?
first im not trying to be rude by what i say in this post, but what did you mean by that? did you imply that im trying to be funny? cause if so im not trying to be funny, i seriously wanted to know how he thought bree could be mormon. but i was just recently directed to the mormon wedding category and now i see. i still think hes wrong, but now i see where he got his ideas.wintermute wrote:Because JJ isn't trying to be funny.Absynth wrote:im not mormon, nor do i know any, but i can read and ive found that bree couldnt possibly be one, too may contradictions. i was just wondering how JJ came up with that![]()
'mute
Besides...then we couldn't hijack the threads...wintermute wrote:Yes. But then no one would ever read one of my posts again...AutoPilate wrote:Now, isn't that much better than having to read some of the drivel here?
'mute
No, not at all... I meant that JJ seems to like making a leap of logic that makes no sense, and then following that logic to it's most absurd conclusion. I think he does it on purpose, as satire. Or to get a rise out of people. I haven't quite decided which, yet.Absynth wrote:first im not trying to be rude by what i say in this post, but what did you mean by that? did you imply that im trying to be funny? cause if so im not trying to be funny, i seriously wanted to know how he thought bree could be mormon. but i was just recently directed to the mormon wedding category and now i see. i still think hes wrong, but now i see where he got his ideas.
sorry if i gave anyone the wrong ideas
Exactly! And a world without threadjackers isn't a world I want to live in!Kasdeja wrote:Besides...then we couldn't hijack the threads...
Conversely, you can talk smack about someone you have on ignore and never have to slog through one of their pathetic responses again. It's win-win, baby!wintermute wrote:Yes. But then no one would ever read one of my posts again...AutoPilate wrote:Now, isn't that much better than having to read some of the drivel here?
'mute
Imagine the fun when the person creates a "Who has me on ignore?" thread.AutoPilate wrote:Conversely, you can talk smack about someone you have on ignore and never have to slog through one of their pathetic responses again. It's win-win, baby!wintermute wrote:Yes. But then no one would ever read one of my posts again...AutoPilate wrote:Now, isn't that much better than having to read some of the drivel here?
'mute
Sheikh Gomelez wrote:Imagine the fun when the person creates a "Who has me on ignore?" thread.
This thread had entertained me a lot, but I had to chime in at this. This is pure awesomeness. I wanna go first!Sheikh Gomelez wrote:Imagine the fun when the person creates a "Who has me on ignore?" thread.
I could tell you what it is, but it's so banal as to remove all mystique from the avvy.Kasdeja wrote:Is that some evil version of Grimace on your avatar?
Chin up. You're still a sexy penguin...Kasdeja wrote: