Lonelygirl15

Luv2Luvem wrote:

SR wrote:

Evan wrote:please!!!!!

MD5DQ means nothing because it was automatically generated by tinyurl randomly. She had no control over it.

I'm pretty sure you are right. The thing that bugs me is why she keeps posting the poem pic. Are we missing a clue in it, or (and I think this is more likely) will we learn more about it later?

Ah! That makes much more sense! Maybe we need to decode the poem in order to be ready!

SR wrote:

Evan wrote:please!!!!!

MD5DQ means nothing because it was automatically generated by tinyurl randomly. She had no control over it.

I totally disagree, respectably of course. The reason I say this is because a prior image she provided using imageshack began with aabb, which was a clue and was the rhythm to the poem which we had yet to resolve at that point. This image was the poem that was unreadable.

Unless, it was total coincidence that aabb happened to be assigned by imageshack.

SR wrote:
Ah! That makes much more sense! Maybe we need to decode the poem in order to be ready!

Isn't that what we've been doing for 2 days now

dlruss0216 wrote:

SR wrote:

Evan wrote:please!!!!!

MD5DQ means nothing because it was automatically generated by tinyurl randomly. She had no control over it.

I totally disagree, respectably of course. The reason I say this is because a prior image she provided using imageshack began with aabb, which was a clue and was the rhythm to the poem which we had yet to resolve at that point. This image was the poem that was unreadable.

Correct dlruss0216, but you're talking about the filenames in imageshack. Those you CAN control (imageshack does add 3 random characters, though). However, tinyurls cannot be assigned, they are randomly generated.

MD5DQ is the tinyurl that used to point to ex22kl0 and that has not changed. The noticable thing is she seems to be driving it in that we should look at the image.

if so why did she post it?

SR wrote:

dlruss0216 wrote:

SR wrote: MD5DQ means nothing because it was automatically generated by tinyurl randomly. She had no control over it.

I totally disagree, respectably of course. The reason I say this is because a prior image she provided using imageshack began with aabb, which was a clue and was the rhythm to the poem which we had yet to resolve at that point. This image was the poem that was unreadable.

Correct dlruss0216, but you're talking about the filenames in imageshack. Those you CAN control (imageshack does add 3 random characters, though). However, tinyurls cannot be assigned, they are randomly generated.

MD5DQ is the tinyurl that used to point to ex22kl0 and that has not changed. The noticable thing is she seems to be driving it in that we should look at the image.

Ah! Thank you! I'm getting the two confused, obviously. It's no wonder why though...lol

Evan wrote:if so why did she post it?

Again, I think it means we should take a second look either at the poem or at the image itself.

So we keep refering back to the poem.

Perhaps she's been a-lurking and seen that the hysteria has died down, and no-one is really analysing the poem anymore.

Evan wrote:if so why did she post it?

Why did she post the MD5 thing? I can only think because she wants to draw attention to it, either because we need to work on it more now, or because it will be important in the future.

This is really an effort in futility though, at least until we get the next clue. Patience is a virtue, one that I do not possess.

maybe the background needs to be checked and also i noticed after "this is not a game and you must know" she has a : so i think we should pay special attention to these lines

The Pulse Of The Doe-Eyed May Cease
But Cassie Does Not Reast In Peace

One thing that no one has noted in all the posting in the last few days, is that there was a light green highlighter marking ON TOP of this image that stated "holy bible" or at least that was the consensus on what it stated.

So, on the surface we've got that (the holy bible), the readable text of her poem (now), and the scribbly stuff that was overlayed on top of the readable text.

I don't think the scribbly stuff means something and was just used to make the poem unreadable.

I assumed, back when this clue was anagrammed and solved, that the holy bible reference was to make sure we went to the correct bible when we looked up the passage that she notes in her poem.

Maybe we need to go back and look at that passage?

Trying to read more into her poem, or translate it, or decode it (even if possible), is really impossible in my opinion. For now, my feeling is that the poem cannot be used any further, however it might help us in figuring out a clue that's yet to be given.

Luv2Luvem wrote:

SR wrote:
Ah! That makes much more sense! Maybe we need to decode the poem in order to be ready!

Isn't that what we've been doing for 2 days now

Either we're on the wrong track, or haven't got to the solution yet.

dlruss0216 wrote:
Trying to read more into her poem, or translate it, or decode it (even if possible), is really impossible in my opinion. For now, my feeling is that the poem cannot be used any further, however it might help us in figuring out a clue that's yet to be given.

I'm with you here...unless there's something to the background writing, I think that we have figured out what we can from the poem (that something will hapen on the first, which she confirmed) but we will need the poem later.

I googled MD5DQ and got this:

Rar! ϐs G@J v a%*P4 3* Gi\doc bj g1XJT*\ ORf .doc !U +<&L ...

spaciegirl wrote:I googled MD5DQ and got this:

Rar! ϐs G@J v a%*P4 3* Gi\doc bj g1XJT*\ ORf .doc !U +<&L ...

That's a .rar file, what you're seeing is google showing the sourcecode. It's rubbish.