Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:33 am
by raigne
I'm a graphic designer and an IT, not a biology major. Whether stuff ends up being related or not I throw it out there. See prior post about its relevence to Sarin, which I am 99.99% positive has nothing to do with LJ15. I find interesting things and share them. Brainstorming excludes nothing. :)

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:38 am
by TOSG
Fair enough. Just wouldn't want people getting to excited about/invested in something that's almost certainly a dead end.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:40 am
by raigne
I completely understand, and thank you for your injection of sobriety. :wink:

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:34 pm
by balmung480
lol i think these are the most posts i have seen on one of my topics. I am surprised trainer responded so fast. Anyway hella mentioned that rna molocules acted as catalysts i remember one of the facility j vids is called "catalyst...you rang" perhaps that is significant. gjtko2007 i really hope that6 facility j gets important beecause i missed out on opAphid

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:47 pm
by Haether
That meant the resulting children had three genetic parents: mother, father, and mtDNA donor.
and just a little sidenote that's seriously OT, mtDNA likely came from our bacterial ancestors...

this whole ribozyme, partially revealed notebook thing is just making this all the more uncertain and crazy. Ack.